QUESTION MARK OVER MENTAL HEALTH CASH FOR OLDER PEOPLE

Liberal Democrat Spokesperson on Health, Cllr Ron Aitken, has expressed serious concerns after the Social Services and Health Scrutiny Panel were told last month that almost half a million pounds could be withdrawn for mental health care for the elderly in the London Borough of Haringey.

The panel heard from officials of the Haringey Teaching Primary Care Trust that £400,000 allocated by them to Haringey Council for use in providing mental health care for the elderly may be withdrawn “if appropriate use cannot be demonstrated”. During a presentation by the PCT about their funding position for the coming year it emerged that there is a dispute between the PCT and the Council as to whether the money has actually been spent on its intended purpose.

The dispute arises from the long-running saga of Haringey Council’s contracting out of elderly and learning disability homes, which the Lib Dems have repeatedly criticised, as the homes were eventually taken back into direct Haringey management.

“The Council told us that this problem was all taken care of,” said Cllr Aitken, “yet here we find that Haringey may have accepted money to provide care for vulnerable, mentally ill older people and may not be able to prove that it was used for this purpose. If this is the case then there will be a funding gap for next year and future years.”

In a Draft Report provided to Members of the Scrutiny Panel at the meeting in December the PCT say they are trying to resolve the issue of how the money has been spent, but that if the issue is not resolved vital services for older people with mental health problems may have to be withdrawn. Cllr Aitken asked for an update of the position shortly before Christmas but officials were unable to confirm that the matter had been resolved.

“I am seriously concerned that services for older people with mental health problems may be withdrawn after March unless Haringey can prove that they used the money to pay for services for older people in the last few years. We need them to come clean on their financing of these vital services,” said Cllr Aitken.

HIGHGATE – LIB DEMS COMMENT ON MAJOR ELECTRICAL FAULT AND FIRES

Commenting on Sunday morning’s series of fires in Highgate caused by a major electrical fault in the area, local resident and GLA member Lynne Featherstone, says:

“Clearly, this is a very serious incident. Hundreds of homes in Highgate have been affected and thankfully no major injuries seem to have resulted. EDF Energy will have to answer some very serious questions about how an incident on this scale can have occurred.

“This also serves as a reminder of how absolutely vital it is for people to check that they have smoke alarms installed and that they are working properly.”

Lib Dem leader and local councillor Neil Williams adds:

“Several residents have told me today that they had reported fluctuating electricity supply in the past week, and now we have had this serious event. I will be asking EDF about the nature of the fault, and when they last checked and replaced the equipment at the substation which apparently caused it.

“All of that said, I would like to thank the London Fire Brigade and all of the emergency services for how they worked together today to tackle the incident.”

Oyster cards

Walk into office to be greeted by howls of laughter from my press officer and office manager. Marina Hyde (Guardian Diary – which one tries to avoid coverage in) has been sent my Christmas Eve newspaper column.

It was just a bit of fun – a festive fairytale with a bit of political mischief (as the Ham & High billed it). It followed on from my last year’s Christmas Fairy tale.

Anyway – Ms Hyde appeared concerned about my mental well-being and asked for reassurance which I gave later in the day along with the Doctor’s suggested remedy of becoming a Member of Parliament to ensure no relapses.

Pop in to Budget Committee for the part on the transport budget. I decide at the end (when non-members of the committee can raise issues) to have a go over the Oyster card mess that has erupted over the holiday period, at the introduction of new fares. We need to get this sorted as Oyster is a great idea in which public confidence is being shaken by the number of cock-ups by Transport for London.

I note with some irony that the vast majority of cock-ups mean that TfL gets money it is not entitled to out of our pockets.

Humps and tubes

Assemble in the chamber for the three-minute silence. Brief speech by Ken followed by the silence. Many members and staff of the Assembly gathered. It feels appropriate to mark such an event with some formality.

Then, telephone interview with Transcalm.They are undertaking a marketing exercise to see how their ‘magic’ hump can best become a nice little earner. I inform the interviewer of my view that Dunlop were short-sighted (I may have used the term stupid) to have failed to take up the opportunities of a trial in Haringey.

Basically this road hump lies flat if you go over at the prescribed speed but remains a hump if you are speeding (as you pass over it too fast for it to deflate). I love the idea of rewarding good driving and punishing bad.

To date – the ‘magic’ hump has been trialled thus: two humps in a slip road in Puddle Dock. I suggest that they run it on a residential road in Haringey and/or a bus lane. When I set up a meeting to facilitate this in Haringey – the price they wanted to charge was still 50% of the normal price. Now these babies are not cheap – particularly in the short term – and the company who will make a mint if they take off should be willing to give a better deal than that to councils or authorities willing to give it a trial.

Then on to looking at Transport for London’s overspend on their budget (for budget committee tomorrow). They are £70 million over – despite raised fares – and have lots of problems with Oyster card bugs. So if they are going to bug London’s travellers, I am going to bug them about their bugs.

My other bugbear (excuse the pun) today is that London Underground have missed 4 out of 6 of their reliability targets. I got the answer to a Mayoral question and it’s a sadly familiar pattern: targets missed, performance down. It just adds insult to injury when the tube fares are the highest in the world, have just been raised and this coincides with big cheese Bob Kiley’s £51,000 rise and the tubeworkers’ 5.2%.

Guess who isn’t invited to the table – me and you. We pay more and get less. Bet Ken wouldn’t use that as his manifesto message.

Happy New Year!

Back to work, shoulder to the grindstone and all that! First off – a meeting with the PPP Arbiter. Who? What? Indeed!

The PPP Arbiter is the guy appointed to watch over and arbitrate on the Tube PPP contract. He cannot comment on what’s in the contract – but where the various parties are in dispute over any aspect of the contract, he can give guidance. He has sweeping powers to gather information – far superior to LU, the Assembly, TfL or the Mayor. Just wish we could get hold of the info he has access to.

Within the limited remit of the position, the PPP Arbiter seemed to be taking a pretty pro-active role. He could sit back and just act as and when there was a statutory requirement for a review of contract performance or for the seven and a half year “break clause” review built into the contract. But he is setting up a methodology which he hopes will be agreed in advance and is seeking to influence and persuade into better performance.

I have gone there with my vice-chair and officers to seek advice as to where the problems between parties involved in the PPP lay. I have coming before my committee (Transport Committee of the London Assembly) Tim O’Toole – the MD of London Underground – and possibly the Chief Execs of both Tubelines and Metronet. I haven’t quite decided on the latter as yet. I want to find the areas of weakness so that the London Assembly can forensically question those responsible for delivering the PPP as to why London is paying through the nose for a seemingly worsening service.

Meanwhile – have received answers to my Mayoral questions on the tube showing that there are hundreds of speed restrictions imposed on our network. These are termed ‘temporary’ restrictions but many have been in place for over 6 months. Just a bit of poking which with the help of the media keeps prodding LU into getting its act together.

MUSWELL HILL LIBRARY – COUNCIL RESPONDS TO CONCERNS

Haringey Council has told the Liberal Democrats that there are no specific proposals to move the site of Muswell Hill library, despite an admission that facilities are inadequate at the present building. Haringey Council was responding to a request for more information from Cllr Lynne Featherstone following concerns from residents in the Muswell Hill area that the Council was planning to move the library.

The Council says that the public areas and facilities are poor at the library, which occupies a prime site near Muswell Hill Broadway. Work is currently being undertaken to see how this can be improved within the existing building, but there are major doubts based on the design of the building, its listed status and the likely cost of development for rather limited benefits.

The Council says that the library could be relocated if and when an opportunity arises. As yet, there are no options on the table and there is no money available. The Council has given an assurance that it will consult widely should any changes be proposed.

Lynne Featherstone, Lib Dem councillor for Muswell Hill, comments:

“I hope this will deal with fears that the library may be moved unexpectedly. If the library were ever to relocate, we would want to ensure that facilities were substantially improved and that it remained easy to access for all residents in the area. There must also be the maximum possible consultation with residents over any changes.”

FINSBURY PARK – RESIDENTS RESPOND TO SURVEY

Local residents believe that Finsbury Park should be used to host some large events, but are unhappy with the levels of consultation over its use, according to the results of a survey carried out by Stroud Green councillor Laura Edge and the local Liberal Democrats. The Lib Dem survey was delivered door-to-door in late 2004.

By just over two to one, residents backed the idea that there should be large events in the park, but 81% said that they did not think residents in the area were consulted enough. Furthermore, less than one in five residents (16%) said they were happy with the state of the park after events have been held. The concern follows repeated pressure from residents’ groups for a better clean-up and action to address damage to the park’s facilities after major events. Councillors Laura Edge and Lynne Featherstone are following up the issues raised in the survey.

Lynne Featherstone comments:

“Many residents feel that the clean-up after events varies greatly in quality. I am investigating what action we can secure to ensure that a proper clean-up always occurs. We also need better consultation in future.

“While there isn’t opposition in principle to some events, Finsbury Park is first and foremost a local park. I will be working with Laura Edge to ensure future improvements.”

NEW CONCERN OVER PHONE MAST

Local Lib Dems have renewed their call for Vodafone to abandon plans to install a mobile phone base station mast in Alexandra ward. The call follows a visit to the site by Lib Dem Parliamentary spokesperson Cllr Lynne Featherstone with Lib Dem Deputy leader Wayne Hoban, in whose ward the planned site lies.

Local residents living near the site, at the junction of Albert Road and Durnsford Road, have been outraged by the plans, and expressed their opposition at a public meeting earlier in the year. Lib Dems have also sharply criticised the company for refusing to engage with local residents by attending a public meeting on the issue.

The new mast would be in close proximity to a recently erected one belonging to O2, which appeared with little warning only about one year ago. As the masts are not subject to planning permission, Lib Dems says that pressure must be brought on the mobile phone companies.

Lib Dem Parliamentary spokesperson Lynne Featherstone comments:

“The planning system is stacked against residents when it comes to the location of mobile phone masts. I am not convinced that enough is being done by the phone companies to work together to share facilities. We do not want this to be another case of the issue going quiet and then a new mast suddenly appears in the area.”

Happy Christmas

Much finishing off of business and tying up of loose ends. Decide Mayor must come and face music over proposal to raise Congestion Charge to £8.00 and arrange for New Year.

Hornsey Town Hall issue went to the Labour Exec on Tuesday night – and the proposal for a proto-trust leading to independent trust is passed – unfortunately with a developer-led slant. Hopefully we can at least push for the Hornsey Town Hall trust people to take part in this process as they have good ideas and energy and commitment.

As we run down to the 24th the RMT are threatening strikes (no change there) and as I run down Marylebone High Street trying to do my Christmas shopping on Thursday, BBC London phone for me to do a special on the 27th. No – say I – tickets for Mary Poppins bought almost a year ago prohibit. And so it’s Christmas Eve and I am blogging off now until 4th January.

Wishing anyone who is looking in a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.

Another Christmas fairy tale

‘Twas Christmas Eve and the snow was falling gently on the beautiful glass palace where twenty-five political elves and a handsome Mayor (more of a frog really – but for the sake of the story, handsome) lived.

Nearly a year had passed since the Mayor had been discovered – frozen on a plinth in Trafalgar Square. And much had come to pass in the land in that year and the ruling order had changed.

The red elves had taken the cold, stiff body to No 10 Downing Street where the all-powerful strong-willed Prince – much more powerful than the Mayor – had breathed life back into him. But not life as the Mayor had known it before. Now the Mayor no longer cared about the people of London. All he now cared about was pleasing the Prince.

Meanwhile the dark shadow of mistrust had fallen across the land. Once upon a time, not that long ago, the people had truly loved the Prince – but he had betrayed them and taken them to war and death on falsehoods. Now the forces of darkness were gathering against him.

His staunchest ally, an authoritarian and illiberal wizard, had fallen in love with a seductive witch who cast a spell upon him. The spell made him do things that no wizard should – and he had used his power for personal gain. When a Wizard misuses his powers – he is done for – and thus it came to pass that he left his master’s service in disgrace.

And the enemy within was not far away. There was a most powerful foe living only next door, brooding and jealous, and the strong-willed Prince was scared – but still his power was absolute and his rule iron. Anyone who challenged him was dispensed with. The Mayor too now did his bidding. London was in darkest danger.

Only the political elves could save London. But the blue elves continued to fight amongst themselves. The red and green elves (much less in number than before) had no will of their own and did whatever the Mayor instructed them to do. The purple elves – who were new – didn’t have a clue what they were doing. Only the golden elves stood up for the people of old London Town. And the people were glad.

But the Mayor did not like the popularity of the golden elves. He was jealous and he would peevishly attack them whenever he could. In fact the Mayor and the Prince had both begun to notice a golden glow in the skies above an area in the north of London Town.

On Christmas Eve preparations were already well underway for the Great Event- an event foretold by the soothsayers which would fall on May 5 in the year of Our Mayor, 2005.

The Prince instructed the Mayor to stop the golden political elves at all costs. So as the snow fell on Christmas Eve the Mayor called the golden elves to his chamber and offered them each a golden glass of bubbling liquid to celebrate the year’s end. But the chalice was poisoned and they all fell into a deep sleep from which no one could awaken them.

The people were distraught. As they wended their way home no one knew whether they would live or die. Golden helpers delivered leaflets up and down the land asking people to clap their hands at midnight on Christmas Eve as the only way to save the elves.

And the people did clap. And the elves were saved.

As the snow settled on the rooftops of London all was well and there was peace and goodwill to all throughout the land.

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.