Electing council group leaders

Threw cat amongst the pigeons – Lib Dem pigeons naturally – at London Region Conference tonight. However, the pigeons didn’t react as expected.

I had written a piece for Liberal Review a while back on how Lib Dem council group leaders are elected – currently by the elected councillors in that group. I had suggested that this should be changed to come in line with how we elect our Party Leader – one member one vote. The comments that followed were pretty robust and whilst there were many who agreed – there were certainly a whole host who felt that you couldn’t and shouldn’t let ordinary members have a say. Shock horror. Anyway – if you want to read the piece in full it’s at on the Liberal Review website.

Tonight I simply put the case and then it has to be said, barring one councillor who spoke against, all seemed to think it was the right thing to be thinking about. So have asked those there to take it back to their particular areas and see and debate in their own local parties – and then – use the usual opportunities to bring forward such a motion.

I also gave a keynote speech, my last as London Spokesperson as Tom Brake is taking over following my elevation to Shadow Cabinet. So outside of encouraging our troops and pointing out our tremendous advances in London, I was laying out a thesis about gun and gang culture and putting forward some suggestions on how to engage fathers with their children. You can read what I said on my website.

Control orders: Labour break their word, again

I couldn’t help thinking, as Blair announced the beginning of a phased withdrawal from Iraq (too little, too late and too slow – but better than nothing) that this was two finger to Brown. For had Brown’s 100 days started with an announcement of withdrawal he would have had instant double-bounce. Sooooooo – that explains the timing!

Sponsored (which means basically booked the room) for the Centre Forum debate ‘Security versus Liberty’ where Nick Clegg (Home Affairs No 1) was able to trail our opposition to the extension of control orders before the debate tomorrow.

When introduced in 2005 as an emergency – the Government promised (oh when will I learn) that they would have a proper review of them one year later. One year later they didn’t review them – but extended them with the promise of a review one year on. One year on they didn’t review them – they just wanted to extend them.

So – we are going to stamp our feet about this and vote against. They will still win – of course – they have a majority. But it is wrong to incarcerate people without trial without making all best efforts to bring them to trial whenever practical. And there’s much more the Government could and should be doing rather than simply falling back on the easy option of locking people up without having to prove their case against them in a proper court case. Examples of what they could be doing include allowing phone-tap and other intercept evidence to be used in court and also the use of questioning after people have been charged.

London Region Conference speech

Ten years ago, I was in the run up to my first general election as a candidate (seems like only yesterday!) – and looking round the room now, it is great to see how much progress we as a party have made in London.

It’s not just that I’m up here speaking to you (though the bit of near-miraculous progress that saw me get elected to Parliament is one pretty dear to my heart!) – but back before the 1997 general election there was only one Liberal Democrat MP in London – and it felt like it had been that way for ever.

And as for the idea back then that here in Camden we might actually be running the council, or that we might have real chances of electing a Liberal Democrat MP in Lewisham or that the Labour-Tory battleground of Brent might have a Lib Dem council and a Lib Dem MP … or indeed just over the road in Haringey that we might even have a solitary councillor let alone an MP! Well now we have 27 councillors and I am the MP!

We have all together come a long, long way. Whether it is due to your hard work delivering leaflets, talking on the doorsteps, improving councils, working with the media or – my own speciality – nagging until we get things done – the results are here for us all to see.

Not just in election results but in the way we’ve been changing the way we are governed. We have set the agenda on so very many things.

Door-to-door recycling used to the preserve of Liberal Democrat campaigns – now Labour and the Tories have embraced it too. Success!

Devolving power down to areas and neighbourhoods used to be opposed by Labour and Tories – now they too talk about decentralising – though their words come more easily than their deeds.

And we still lead the way – as with Richmond’s innovations in relating residents’ parking charges to the pollution impact of the cars.

All these achievements have been won thanks to the hard work and steely motivation of you all in this room – and many others not here with us.

The way so many of you keep going year after year trying to make your part of the world just that little bit better reminds me rather of a quote from Horace Mann about how we should “Be ashamed to die until you have won some victory for humanity”.

And the tragic news of the latest round of gun crimes in London reminds us all how much we need more victories for humanity.

The problems gun crime and gang culture raise are not amenable to overnight solutions or sudden initiatives – the usual Labour response to so many issues.

Though – to be fair – I think Blair’s recent response has got this more right than Cameron.

We do need to address the issues of young people carrying guns, and that may include revising some of the sentencing rules. But longer sentences (if you are caught) (and if you are convicted) are only a small part of any solution.

Not only are most people who commit crimes not caught, but given the state of our prisons – and the shockingly high re-offending rates – for those who are caught, far too often prison is but a pause between crimes. A welcome pause, but only a pause.

It’s a matter of in the door, welcome to the university of crime, out the door, welcome to another crime.

And yes, even our call for more police on the street is not the whole answer either.

Where Blair was right was in his call for a better witness protection scheme. In order to convict you need witnesses to come forward.

But the gang members won’t dis another gang member. And the witnesses won’t risk speaking out. So the guilty gang members escape.

I well remember how, during the 2005 election, a woman rang me in despair because both her son and her grandson were up for murder. And she said they had a loving home – but their aspiration was to be a criminal – to be somebody and to be in a gang.

So it won’t be easy and it won’t be quick; it may be hard, it may be challenging; but it is a must – changing this cancerous culture of guns and gangs.

It is not a culture that has a grip across the whole nation or in all communities. There are other issues for the crisis in youth behaviour – and the recent UNICEF report raises a whole host of other problems – but that is not the essence of this gun culture problem – which has been around for years but which is in the spotlight right now.

Where David Cameron got it wrong was in thinking that the answer is to just dish out blame, back to basics style.

His comments were an offence to all the single parents who bring their children up in loving, decent homes.

Now yes – of course – role models are vital. And good male role models are vital.

But you can’t force people to stay together – even with tax breaks. (And frankly, what sort of home would it be where the parents only stick together to get a better tax code?)

That isn’t the answer. The answer lies in getting fathers involved and the mothers supported.

Rather than trying to force couples together, we can look at the way schools often in their actions end up making it easy for fathers to drop away – and even push them away.

For schools so often work through the female, maternal network. It can – for example – be difficult for separated couples to go together to parents’ evenings. So often only one of the separated parents attends – normally the mother – and neither the school nor the father makes an effort to get in touch with the other. And so the men drop away.

In America they have something called Dads and Doughnuts. Whatever. It’s a night when father’s come to school without the mums but with the children. It gives fathers an easy route to be good fathers and engage in the school life of their offspring – separately from the mothers.

And there are so many other soft measures that could and would help. That’s where we need to be working.

And education. Black boys’ education in some areas falls way behind. That’s where we need to be working too.

And with the community leaders – we need to work on the good role models – so that the aspiration is not to carry a gun and be a criminal – but to be a good member of the community, working for a decent living and raising a family.

Turning to the issue of discrimination: it doesn’t directly cause crime, and it doesn’t excuse it. But racial discrimination does exist in far too many parts of our society, and it is a contributory factor to that sense of alienation and anger which gang culture feeds on.

We should also remember that discrimination boomerangs back to affect even the majority group.

When we have problems like the disproportionate use of stop and search on black and Asian Londoners, it’s not just them who suffer – so does everyone else from the police time wasted by the fact that an innocent black man is far more likely to be stopped by the police than an innocent white man.

That disproportionality means police time is taken away from catching criminals whose next victim could be any one of us.

And finally, turning to our own party. We have to be honest and recognise that our ability to champion improvements in our community is restricted if we don’t fully reflect those communities.

Right across the breadth of the challenge facing us – we make life harder for ourselves and we make success less likely if we come over as white people lecturing others on how to behave.

And that is why being serious about changing the make-up of our Parliamentary Party at the next general election is so important – and before that – on the London Assembly.

There has been a lot of talk in the party recently about Ming’s initiative with the diversity fund. I’ll simply say this – we all need it to succeed.

But in the end it is not about listening to what others – like myself – say.

The real power to bring about change lies with you, inside your head. Do you want to just sit back and comment on the world – clapping here, tut-tutting there? Or will you roll up your sleeves and get to work in your communities? Do you want to just complain about the world – or do you also want to change it?

So why not, each of you here tonight, resolve to do the following?

Visit three ethnic minority members or local residents in your ward or area within the next four weeks. And talk to them. If they are members – ask them to think about standing for council. If they are not members, ask them to get involved.

Want a change? Then help make it happen. Because that’s the only way it is going to happen!

Which is why I’d end on another quote – this time from our former Liberal MP, Russell Johnston:

“A liberal society will be built only with the bricks of effort and the mortar of persistence. And it is to you that the challenge is made. It is upon you that responsibility rests. It is with you that hope resides.”

Well done Kirsty Williams

Have now seen all the short-listings categories for the Dods Women of the Year Awards and note that my Lib Dem colleague Kirsty Williams (Welsh Lib Dem AM) has been nominated too in the Welsh Assembly Member category. Congrats to Kirsty!

Liz Santry and Haringey Council's website

You may have seen in the local papers how Haringey Labour councillor Liz Santry (Haringey Council Executive Member for Young People) has had a go about a supposed mistake on this blog.

In brief – I said Haringey had failed to properly publicise an important public meeting through its website, and even now – as I write this and after she wrote to all and sundry saying I was wrong – the relevant web page doesn’t mention the meeting at all.

In more detail – I wrote on 6th February:

So – the second meeting of the ‘New School Bidders’ for the competition to take control and author a new secondary school in Haringey. If you remember, we kicked up at the first meeting because there were only six were members of the public.

This time it was a packed meeting – maybe a hundred people. I had put out an email to my lists as I am never convinced that a notice in a local paper – which is the standard Council approach – really reaches everyone. It’s a good thing that other people did promote this meeting as Haringey Council did not even get round to updating their website pages about the new school to mention the second meeting. But this time we didn’t leave it to just the Council – and got a far, far better attendance.

Haringey Council’s website pages about the new school is here and is found if you take the obvious (albeit long!) course through the menus from the council website front page: Home >> Children and Families >> Schools and Education >> Consultations >> New Secondary School

It only mentioned (and still mentions) the 16th January (poorly attended) meeting and not the one on 6th February. In fact, even as I write this now that meeting is still not mentioned – even though the page is noted as having been updated on 13th February.

Yet Liz Santry claimed in her letter that my blog entry was “Completely untrue. The appropriate web pages were updated on 17 January and will remain active at least until the consultation period closes.” All rather undermined by the absence of a mention about the second public meeting to go with the mentions of the first meeting – you’d have thought someone would at least have hurriedly added the information after she sent off her letter of complaint!

Transport for London briefing

Briefing for the London MPs by Transport for London (TfL). Felt like my old stomping ground as five years on the GLA’s Transport Committee stands you in good stead for knowing just what they are talking about.

What glared at me was the lack of planning for capacity increases to cope with the increased transport demands coming from Mayor Ken’s housing program for London.

We get the houses (much needed) but not the infrastructure to go with it – in this case the extra public transport.

The other glaring issue is the set of glitches (polite term) for the PPP tube contracts. I’ve asked for the performance statistics – as it might very well appear that the failure rate is once more increasing. One wonders whether we are even getting the bangs for bucks that were contracted for – let alone what we might have been aspiring to.We’ll see when the stats come through.

Other than that it was really TfL’s projections and planning up to 2025. Yes – it’s all the right words – but in the end it’s the dosh that will make the real difference.

Lynne Featherstone shorted-listed for Woman MP of the Year award

Lynne Featherstone, Lib Dem MP for Hornsey & Wood Green, has been shorted-listed for the prestigious Dods ‘Woman MP of Year’ Award.

The award is granted to the “most effective woman in the House of Commons who has shown outstanding parliamentary achievement during the year either as a minister or backbencher and who has done much to positively raise the standing of politics both inside the House and with the public.”

The final decision will be made by a vote of all MPs and Peers and revealed at the awards ceremony on 8th March 2007.

Lynne Featherstone MP comments:

“I am absolutely thrilled to make the shortlist. The barriers to women entering politics are not what they once were but the House of Commons does sometimes feels like an old boys’ club with some of its testosterone-fuelled yah boo debates leaving a lot to be desired.

“For me encouraging more women in Parliament isn’t about feminism, but simple equality. If I have inspired one woman to take the leap into politics then we’re one step closer to having representatives that truly reflect the make up of the people they serve.”

Comments from the Dods’ website on Ms. Featherstone’s nomination:

“But it is not only for her impressive start as a Westminster parliamentarian that Lynne Featherstone receives the nomination for MP of the Year: she also deserves praise for her blog using it to demystify politics, engage with the public and show that politicians have a human face.”

Labour commit to more consultation on new parking charges

Haringey Liberal Democrats have welcomed a climb-down by Haringey Labour’s embattled leadership over their failure to consult properly over new parking charges. The move came at a Full Council meeting last night, when the Labour leader told Lib Dem councillors Martin Newton and Neil Williams that he had “no problem” with extending the consultation period to six weeks.

Liberal Democrats had forced the decision by top Labour councillors to be reconsidered in a meeting with the Council’s ‘watchdog’ committee last week, in which Lib Dems criticised Labour’s inadequate consultation plans. The admission by the Labour leader will be seen as a concession to Lib Dem pressure to engage the public on such a big change in parking policy.

Cllr Neil Williams, Leader of the Opposition, comments:

“Lib Dem pressure, with support on this occasion from some Labour councillors, has forced the Labour leadership to change their mind on this issue.”

Cllr Martin Newton, Transport spokesperson, adds:

“We welcome this move and hope that the public will be more engaged in the process. Six weeks is not ideal, but it is a little better than what he had before. The key issue now is to ensure that the public are given a more meaningful opportunity to give their views – and that those views are listened to.”

Lib Dem dismay as Council Tax in Haringey hits over £1,400 a year

A typical Haringey Council Tax bill will now cost a whopping £1431.74, up from £1383.59 in 2006/07, following the setting of the Council Tax last night. Haringey Liberal Democrats have criticised the move, which followed Labour Mayor Ken Livingstone’s decision to increase his Council Tax levy by an inflation busting 5.3%.

Liberal Democrats are pointing to the rapid increase of Council Tax under the Labour administration in Haringey over the past ten years. A total of £575.74 has been added to the tax burden for the residents of Haringey – an increase of two-thirds – since 1998-9.

Neil Williams, Lib Dem Opposition Leader, comments:

“Council Tax bills in Haringey have nearly doubled in recent years, and local people can ill afford it.

“If Haringey wasted less money, and Ken Livingstone spent less on self serving publicity we could have got an increase lower than 5.3%, while still protecting key services like policing and transport. These are crippling bills and as Haringey Labour showed last night that they simply do not care.”

Nominated for an award

Get a phone call. Good news. I knew I had been nominated in the Dods Woman of the Year Award (Woman MP category) – and today they rang to say I had been shortlisted.

I know. I know. You can’t take to much notice of these things – but it’s better to be mentioned than not be mentioned!