Haringey Council failing to safeguard adults consistently says report

Haringey Council is failing to ensure that all adults are consistently safeguarded – that is the damning indictment of a newly published inspection report from the Care Quality Commission (CQC). Local Liberal Democrats have said that, coming only months after government enquiries following the Baby Peter case, the report again questions Haringey Council’s ability to safeguard local residents.

The inspection by the CQC was carried out in January 2009. It reveals failures by Haringey Council to comply consistently with safeguarding procedures, shows that Haringey Council does not record safeguarding information effectively and that it needs to improve risk assessment.

The report sets out fifteen recommendations for Haringey Council to implement in order to improve adult social services. Haringey Council has said that it is disappointed at the reports findings but that it accepts all the recommendations.

Cllr Robert Gorrie, Haringey Liberal Democrat Leader, comments:

“Once again serious questions hang over Haringey Council’s ability to look after our most vulnerable residents.

“The report offers little encouragement for people accessing Haringey’s adult social services.”

Lynne Featherstone MP adds:

“Only weeks after the damning inspection which exposed the lack of progress made by Haringey Council to repair children’s social services, this is another worrying example of Haringey Council’s failure.

“We need confirmation that the CQC’s recommendations have been implemented.”

Success as threatened ticket offices to remain open

Ticket offices at two local train stations in Haringey look set to remain open following a campaign by Liberal Democrats. This week First Capital Connect announced that threatened ticket offices at Alexandra Palace and Finsbury Park stations will now be saved from cuts. Liberal Democrats have welcomed the announcement but are disappointed that ticket office closures at Harringay, Hornsey and Bowes Park stations will still go ahead.

In January 2009 local Liberal Democrats launched a campaign against cuts that proposed to reduce local ticket office hours by 114 hours.

Lynne Featherstone MP comments:

“It is great news that Alexandra Palace and Finsbury Park station ticket offices will be saved from closure.

“But we will not stop there. The same safety and customer service concerns remain at Harringay, Hornsey and Bowes Park station. We will continue to push for local residents and passengers to get the services that they need and deserve.”

Cllr Martin Newton, Liberal Democrat Transport spokesperson, adds:

“We would like to thank all local residents who supported our campaign. This will really make a difference for those local people who use train services from Finsbury Park and Alexandra Palace stations.”

Parking tickets and fines

Lots in the news on parking and the unfairness of half the tickets seemingly issued. Quite right too. I have always been a great supporter of parking regulations and proper enforcement – when the purpose is safety, traffic flow, helping businesses by providing a steady flow of parking spaces through the day (i.e. by stopping people taking up a space all day) and so on – but above all where those plans are suitable for the local circumstances and have been properly consulted on.

It is difficult to be a supporter, however, as the reality on the ground is so often just the opposite of the benefits promised: tickets issued wrongly, cameras positioned to rake in revenue, CPZs badly designed, confusing signing which seems to serve only to trap the innocent to making a mistake – and the good guys who find a meter and pay the tariff and get back a minute late find they have the same astronomical fine – and the bastard who parks dangerously on yellow lines, has no insurance and no license gets away with not paying their ticket.

If we are to continue to support proper regulation then it’s time councils got their act together. Wardens need proper training and common sense – that would be a start. Councils that issue tickets wrongly should be fined in proportion to that number – and that is quite substantial. Basically – the good motorist should not find that they are put to time and trouble to fight a ticket that shouldn’t have been issued or is the result of poor signing or warden error!

When I was Chair of Transport in London I carried out an investigation of parking enforcement in London – and found so many faults with the system that we made dozens of recommendations to improve and make fair this system which is now falling into disrepute and which makes the good citizen very, very angry.

One of the recommendations was about the relative ‘crimes’ of being a minute over on a meter compared with say two hours. Westminster Council took up the recommendation that the lower offence receive a lower fine. There are still many other good recommendations in that report which are clearly still badly needed if we are to have a fair system.

And yes – we should all try and use public transport more and cars less – but when people do use their cars they should be treated fairly.

We don’t have an easier time over recess!

Cross-posted from Liberal Conspiracy:

Grrrrrrrrr – so cross listening to the radio on Wednesday morning with Andrew Pierce of the Telegraph opining on MPs going off on ‘82 days’ holiday. Holiday? My backside! If he thinks not being in Parliament equals being on holiday, then I trust he applies the same standards to himself – and any time he spends outside of the Telegraph offices he counts as holiday too!

The truth is that for both MPs and journalists the job can and should involve more than being in the main office. Getting out and meeting people, for example, is a major part of doing either job well. When Sunny asked me to write a short piece on what MPs do in recess I didn’t think I would have time before I go away. But I’m maddened by the hatred and vitriol from the radio towards the summer recess as if all MPs do no work during it.

Rant over.

I understand the anger at MPs – but as one of the MPs who was declared a ’saint’ by the Telegraph, ’squeaky clean’ by my local papers – and who works right throughout the recess (except when on actual holiday) I am beginning to think I am a mug. I didn’t take the opportunity to coin it by getting a second home (that I am ‘allowed’ within the rules) and I don’t bugger off for the summer doing nothing.

But given the ‘tarred with the same brush’ syndrome – I must just be stupid.

So – as I calm down – and remember that it is important that the good guys fight on and don’t leave the battlefield – here is a little picture of my recess occupation.

The best thing about recess is just working like an ordinary human being – basically 9 – 5pm and not at weekends. During term time – I work a seven day week – with Monday and Tuesday being 6am – 11.30pm, Wednesday and Thursday being 6am – 10pm, Friday usually 6am – 6pm plus evening engagements one or two out of every four weeks; and Saturday and Sunday are always working, emails, paperwork, constituency events, etc.

So – you can see why it feels fantastic to just work a normal working week.

Lots of meetings and visits that I haven’t managed to fit in during term time are scheduled for recess period – and obviously surgeries and casework, continue in usual fashion. I also use recess to write articles, prepare for (in this recess) the return of the Equality Bill to the floor of the House at Report Stage and prepare speeches. That time to think, research and learn is vital – as otherwise you are just at the mercy of others who tell you what you should be thinking. But the best thing is being able to do something for the constituents that I would never normally have time for.

The year before last I set off to visit every shop in the constituency on foot – from high street to tiny parade (over-ambitious – I only made it to about 60%). It was incredibly useful. The shops and small businesses were thrilled and I was able to raise their concerns both with the local council and in Parliament.

Last year I set out to visit every older persons residential home and sheltered housing (again over-ambitious – made it to about 70%) and it too was hugely useful for picking up the issues that older residents needed me to take up. It was also good to go to older people where they are as sometimes they find it difficult to get to public meetings, surgery or whatever.

This year I am aiming to spend one to two days walkabout in each of the ten wards that made up my constituency of Hornsey & Wood Green finding the issues on the ground and meeting and talking to local people.

So that’s what I do in recess – but I think I must be mad!

What developers do in Highgate

Stomped around three developments in Highgate with the top team from Haringey planning department earlier today. After weeks of correspondence and rows – today’s walkabout perhaps clarified a few things – but not anything that should make anyone feel happy. For it would seem that unless a developer adds another floor / administers monstrous harm in terms of impact on neighbours – there is very little that Haringey can do that will deal with developers who given an inch take a mile.

Having looked at one development in Sheldon Avenue which looms large over its neighbours – the height the house has been built to is definitely not the height that they expected from the planning permission – or width or depth for that matter. On close examination – and with use of a scale – you might just detect that the proposed house would be higher but the earlier streetscapes show that the proposed house has the same height of eaves as the next door neighbour. I don’t know – but it seems that Haringey didn’t intervene when first called to see the increase in footprint, then didn’t act on other bits and pieces notified to them and now say that the ‘harmful impact’ isn’t great enough to win any appeal that the developer would make if they enforced.

Game, set and match to developer. Albeit they have issued a formal warning and are going to ask this particularly developer to come in for a ‘chat’. That might help for future – but not for the current situation there.

We, Cllr Rachel Alison and myself, will be asking for a range of actions to be taken – one of which will be to ask that Haringey get height specifications on proper drawings. Any decent architect would put on their drawing – do not scale off of this. I am not sure whether there is any liability on Haringey or not – but we will be enquiring further. Otherwise – I can’t see what there is to stop any developer expanding on plans regardless of planning permission. Of course, the officers are right in that the developer can always apply retrospectively for permission – but I think the harm is done because local residents expect Haringey to have a duty of care to ensure that what gets permission is that which gets built – and nothing more!

Concern at Anjem Choudary's appearance in Noel Park

Noel Park councillor Fiyaz Mughal has demanded answers from Haringey Council after he discovered extremist Anjem Choudary, who previously led the banned Islamist group Al-Muhajiroun, holding a public road-show in Wood Green last weekend.

Cllr Mughal, himself a Muslim, seized the opportunity to openly debate with Mr Choudhary, who was being followed by a Danish camera crew. Cllr Mughal highlighted that the inclusive nature of Islam should respect and protect the rights and beliefs of Christians and Jews, and challenged Choudhary’s view that Muslims should not follow the laws of the UK.

Cllr Fiyaz Mughal (Noel Park) comments:

“Anjem Choudary is solely interested in promoting a simplistic and twisted version of Islam that is offensive to me as a Muslim.

“The messages of this extremist are contrary to any idea of tolerance and he was promoting the failed theory of a ‘clash of civilisations’, a term which should be consigned to the scrapheap just like the Blair & Bush phrase ‘the war on terror’.

“Islam, for me, is based on tolerance, respect for diversity and the laws of the land. These are values which promote the cohesion of communities like those within Noel Park and they need to be protected.

“I was surprised and shocked to see this individual in Noel Park. I will be writing to Cllr Nilgun Canver and the Labour Council to ask them why Noel Park councillors were not informed that he was here and would be carrying out public events.”

Cllr John Oakes (Bounds Green) added:

“Anjem Choudary’s twisted views of Islam are potentially a dagger pointed at the heart of British society, particularly in areas like Haringey.

“The President of the Wightman Road mosque reminds me that Choudary’s predecessor Omar Bakri Fostock was first banned from peddling his violent creed and then deported because of his anti-Semitic views.

“Successful community leaders like Liberal Democrat Cllr Mughal know that Choudary has to be challenged openly with logic, truth and goodwill.

“We must make sure that all law-abiding faiths and cultures are respected and that our local and foreign policies reflect this.”

Parking "consultation" in Noel Park

Haringey are at it again – or more accurately – they are not at it. Yet another ‘consultation’ on parking that has failed to be properly delivered. The local Noel Park LibDems carried out a survey that shows that one in six people failed to even receive the consultation document.

Local people should have received their consultation documents in April this year asking their views on a proposed parking controlled zone for West Green and Bruce Grove. However, from the survey in Boreham Road and Westbury Avenue, carried out by local LibDem councillor Fiyaz Mughal, it is clear that many people never received the documents at all.

The LibDem survey also showed that around seventy per cent of those people who did not receive the consultation documents were against the new CPZ.

Tonight, the Council’s Labour cabinet will decide is the scheme will go ahead – which is clearly nuts – as so many people haven’t even been asked.

Speaker Bercow – maybe not so modern after all!

Well – having fulsomely praised Speaker Bercow for his brave new world action in calling me from the front bench to ask a question during one of Gordon Brown’s statements – I may now have to take it back!

In the chamber yesterday – I saw Speaker Bercow furiously mouthing to a Conservative on the front bench. Said Tory Member leapt to his feet, ran to the back row – and was duly called by Speaker Bercow.

So have I leapt to praise him too soon? Was he gently chided by the establishment post my post? Was my being called from the front bench mere accident or mistake from a new and inexperienced Speaker?

I bloody well hope not!

Concern after Haringey Council silences local resident

Local Liberal Democrats have formally written to the Mayor after the Labour Deputy Leader stopped a Crouch End resident from bringing a deputation to the meeting of the Full Council yesterday. The request, which was to discuss changes to the Crouch End Controlled Parking Zone, was submitted properly and according to Haringey Council’s rules. Yet the Labour Council decided to ignore the appeal, and instead opted to refer all the petitions and the separate deputation to the Cabinet Member for Environment.

Cllr Lyn Weber (Crouch End) comments:

“This is totally unacceptable. It is Haringey Council’s duty to encourage open discussion with residents on issues that concern them and as a bare minimum they should follow their own rules for handling requests for such discussion.

“The decision to effectively ban this resident from speaking at Full Council will only encourage the widely held view that Labour doesn’t listen.

“CPZs can be a difficult and divisive topic and have to be discussed openly and in public. I am furious that these residents have been treated so badly,especially after they took great pains to jump through all the council hoops.”

Cllr Matt Davies, Liberal Democrat Deputy Whip, adds:

“It is clear from this sorry tale that Haringey Council simply picks and chooses which issues it wants to debate in meetings. If they are up against an issue that is not to their liking they brush it under the carpet and refer it away from a public meeting. We must ensure Labour does not abuse Haringey Council’s own rules for managing deputation requests and I have asked Haringey Council for a written account of how this request was handled.”

Vote for your favourite blogs!

It’s that time of year when bloggers enter the battlefield of competition for best blog! Total Politics asks blog-readers to vote for your top 10 favourite blogs. This year the poll is being co-promoted/sponsored by Lib Dem Voice in conjunction with LabourList and Iain Dale’s Diary.

The rules are simple:

1. You must vote for your ten favourite blogs and rank them from 1 (your favourite) to 10 (your tenth favourite).
2. Your votes must be ranked from 1 to 10. Any votes which do not have rankings will not be counted.
3. You MUST include ten blogs. If you include fewer than ten your vote will not count.
2. Email your vote to toptenblogs@totalpolitics.com
3. Only vote once.
4. Only blogs based in the UK, run by UK residents, or based on UK politics, are eligible.
5. Anonymous votes left in the comments will not count. You must give a name.
6. All votes must be received by midnight on 31 July 2009. Any votes received after that date will not count.

I declare an interest!