South Africa: the difficulties of admitting you have AIDS

Back to blogging some more on my brief trip to South Africa the week before last – on my last day we were taken to the mines – open cast coal mines – by Anglo-American. (Click here for photos from the trip).

Brian Brink of Anglo American, who is a doctor whose energy and commitment to tackling AIDS seemed limitless and who had pioneered their program over years, had been with us throughout the tour. Today was to see the actual work going on – on site.

Not going detail by detail – but to capture the picture – the landscape as we approached the mining area was stark beyond belief – punctuated by the machinery of mining, sticking up and dominating the horizon with little oases where head offices, hospital facilities or clinics occasionally were to be found.

I confess I thought it a god-forsaken place to live – and the truth is that it is a pretty harsh life out there for the miners in a hard industry. But what struck me most throughout the day was that the workforce and their well-being was at the heart of this business – not in a touchy feely sort of way – but because decent treatment meant a healthy work force and a healthy work force meant productivity.

As we arrived at the first Head Office – we were greeted by John Standish White – and what a character he was. He put me in mind of a commanding officer – fair but firm, loved by his men and unafraid of tackling whatever issues came forth. In the room were all representatives from the three unions, the medical staff and the key managers. Briefed as to the prevalence of AIDS and the programs Anglo-American (AA) had put in place – we set off to see it all for ourselves.

The first group we met were ‘peer educators’ – a group of women (all volunteers) whose role it was to go amongst the workforce explaining what AIDS was and HIV – and that coming for voluntary testing and counselling was good because now (as opposed to only a few years ago) there was treatment – the anti-retrovirals – that meant you could live with AIDS.

We went onto to see the skills training area where women were being taught how to sew, embroider etc and were making gorgeous tableware. Next door there was restaurant / cook training. Those learning were generally the family of the miners. With relatively little possible employment in the area – skills training is vital. Likewise we met trainee metal workers and visited a youth centre.

All the while we are on Anglo American territory and all of these schemes are Anglo American programs. And we visited a clinic where the workers go for voluntary testing and counselling. We meet Peter – one of the very, very few miners who have ‘disclosed’ their HIV positive status and who are invaluable in trying to encourage and educate others to come forward. The stigma is still severe and fidelity not a local strong point.

At Kleinkopje colliery they are (now) having remarkably high numbers come forward in most of the departments – with the hardcore miners remaining the most difficult nut to crack in terms of persuading them to get testing. But the new incidence rate is still too high – albeit the trend is downwards. And ultimately to beat the disease they want to see no new infections.

We were then put into protective clothing to visit one of the open cast mines. We heard the blasting loud and clear before we leave the office block – and we bumped along a road constructed solely to reach the mines. What is particularly interesting in this stark, empty terrain of deep pits where coal has been mined is that there now is in place a program of refilling the mines and putting the earth back to how it was before it was mined. The scars of extraction removed and the landscape reinstated.

At the pit itself, we posed for photos with the excavating digger behind us. Massive piece of machinery with a cradle which could hold a London bus. I asked John about Anglo American’s views on moving into renewables etc – and it would seem that they are already planning in that direction. As I would hope.

Anyway – I want to get onto the last stop of the day – which was to Anglo American’s piece de resistance. Their hospital – brand spanking new and for all their employees. We had a presentation from Dr Pienar who runs the hospital – but the main event was to meet the local community.

We were told that it is possible that some members of the community may ‘disclose’ their status during this meeting. We entered the room where around I guess eighty or so people were seated – some are miners, their families, health workers from the hospital and so on. We sat – and there was another presentation about the work Anglo American are doing with AIDS and HIV – and then they ask a young guy, one of the health team, to come to the front and they announced that this brave young guy is willing to stand there, publicly and say he is HIV positive. And he did – and then asked if anyone else in the room who is HIV positive wants to come down and join him and disclose their status.

There was no movement at first. And then a guy in the front row stood up and moved towards the front – and then another and another and another. A whole torrent of people come down and faced the room. All HIV positive. All ‘disclosing’ for the very first time. This had never happened before.

Dr Brink said that this was the day they had waited for for many years. And then each of those who had come forward told their story. I was weeping. It was the most extraordinary occasion. And I would like to think that whilst there were many reasons and good things that came out of us three MPs visiting South Africa – this ‘event’ had partly happened because just by us being there we provided a catalyst for the occasion.

It was so moving. They were so brave. And I guess that from this will grow a support group for people living with AIDS and HIV for the first time.

It was quite something!

I'd like to see Nick Robinson's balls

Well, well – another day yesterday of Gordon Brown playing “will he, won’t he” on the general election date.

It’s typical boys and toys stuff – as if the whole electoral system is just his personal plaything to bounce around as he likes.

For all his talk about New Gordon, Open Gordon, Democratic Gordon – it’s still the same old control freak Gordon, treating our democracy – OUR democracy – with contempt. Why should the date of elections be up to him and him alone to pick – and only on the basis of what suits his own vote winning desires the best?

(My own view? Fixed term Parliaments, save for automatic general election on change of PM, vote of no confidence in the Commons or cross-party agreement).

And yet whilst he brazenly displays this contempt for democracy – where are the likes of the BBC’s Nick Robinson? Just meekly playing along as if having a democracy where the Prime Minister gets to fiddle the electoral system to suit his own ends is the only possible imaginable
game.

Sorry Nick – not impressed!

Show us your balls – and start asking Gordon Brown the tough questions – like why should the date of a general election be picked just to suit Labour? Or why Gordon Brown wants to face both ways saying he wants to get on with governing – but doesn’t kill of the date speculation one way or another?

The occasional lobbed soft question to Gordon does the media’s reputation no favours at all. So come on Nick – put Gordon on the spot, ask the tough questions – and keep on until you get an answer.

Happy birthday – and thank you Ryan

As Ryan Cullen points out over on his blog, today is the third birthday of Liberal Democrat Blogs. So happy birthday and thank you to Ryan for running this site – a useful one for me to find out what other people are saying and also to bring more traffic to this site. Win win!

Slightly scary to see from his post how few of us blogging then are still blogging now. Will it turn out like an Agatha Christie novel with us all dropping out one by one until there’s only one nervous blogger left hunched over their keyboard…?

Will he ? Won't he? Will he? Won't he?

Lovely summer party by CASCH (a Crouch End residents’ association). Lots of anger about Haringey Council’s failure to move swiftly to help local residents affected detrimentally by the knock on from a CPZ nearby. Haringey Labour are saying no funds until next year – but these schemes are self-funding so if there was the will there would be the way.

Went straight on to canvassing in Crouch End – testing the water with a ‘if Gordon called an election tomorrow – which way would you vote’? It was very interesting; it always is interesting meeting people – but even more so in these times of fevered political speculation.

People seemed to still be angry with Labour – and the change from Blair to Brown not making the difference perhaps Labour were hoping. The Iraq war is still a key issue. And whilst Labour keep hoping that it will fade and that anyone who swung their vote away from Labour because of Iraq will somehow swing back – that didn’t seem to be the case on the doorstep. Not surprisingly really – as the war is not over and even when we do get our troops out, the mess will still haunt us. That feeling of responsibility and culpability doesn’t vanish with the change of face at No 10.

Anyway – seemed good to me – even though my canvassing is very stringent. I will only put someone down as Lib Dem if they are completely and unequivocally enthusiastic and always vote Lib Dem – anything else I categorise other ways. But as my opponents read my blog – not going to give away canvassing secrets here!

As to the political question of the day. Will he ? Won’t he? Will he? Won’t he? Brown not answering just puts me off – albeit I am already off! So to speak.

How Gordon Brown has changed his mind on the general election date

It’s there in black and white, supported 100% by Gordon Brown – “We [the Labour party] will introduce as a general rule a fixed Parliamentary term.”

Oh – the date of the commitment? The 1992 Labour manifesto as supported by one G Brown. I agree with him – the 1992 vintage that is. It shouldn’t be down to just one person – the Prime Minister – to decide whether or not to hold an election (and making that decision based on their own party’s self-interest).

I want to see fixed-term Parliaments, with provision for early elections if (a) the government loses a vote of confidence, (b) there’s a change of Prime Minister or (c) there is cross-party support (to cover unusual crises or surprises). Cross-party support is crucial for (c) as otherwise it would just once again let the PM pick whatever date they want – and then get it through with a whipped vote. Quite how this would work depends on what happens to House of Lords reform (finally!), but the basic idea is clear.

But back to Brown – I’m amazed what a soft ride the media have been giving him on this. We all know what he’s up to – he wants the election to be on the date that best suits him, and wants to sow as much confusion as possible in the interim as to when it might or might not be. Where’s the democracy in that? Yet the media have gone along with his game.

It’s one of the odd paradoxes of modern political reporting – it’s usual bathed in an instinctive cynical covering about how all politicians are liars and fools – but also is often terribly conservative in playing the traditional rules of the game rather than questioning them (when was the last time a journalist blew the whistle on an unattributable dishing of one politician by another? You see – the rules of the game are that unattributable personal attacks are ok, so they just report them time after time).

So if I was a journalist – I’d be asking Brown to justify why he’s changed his mind, and why – in a democracy of all places – the PM should be able to fiddle the system by picking a date of his or her own choosing? When Mrs T used to do that, Brown opposed it – ah… perhaps that’s where his new-found admiration for her comes in!

My first political memory

Given Iain Dale has tagged me to blog about my first political memory – I cannot resist. The only hesitation I have – is that it somewhat reveals my advanced years!

The first time politics impinged on my secure little childhood was when I was watching television in our lounge in the flat in Highgate that I grew up in – Highpoint. I can’t remember whether they interrupted the TV or whether it was just on the news – but the newscaster in super-serious tones was talking about something to do with Cuba and nuclear war.

I can’t say I truly understood the the whole scenario as I was aged 10 when the crisis began on October 15, 1962. The USA had reconnaissance photos showing Soviet missiles being built in Cuba – hence it became known as the Cuban Missile Crisis. The ante was upped, tensions rose and on the point of nuclear war – letters exchanged etc and Krushchev agreed to dismantle the installations on the basis that the US would not invade Cuba.

As I said, most of this passed me by – but I remember being scared by the news. I understood the danger – and I guess it was the tones of the newscaster and the muted exchanges by my parents. It was this singular event that opened my understanding that the world was not stable and that my world somehow depended on men in foreign countries not taking leave of their senses. Clearly – not a lot has changed!

So – not a British political awakening – but certainly an early understanding of international politics!

In turn – I will tag Will Howells (thanks for filming my conference diaries!), Stephen Tall (man in charge at this year’s Lib Dem Blog of the Years awards – and winner last year), Matt Davies (Haringey colleague – councillor for Fortis Green), Martin Bright (of the New Statesman and a constituent of mine) and Paul Walter (the ultra-prolific Lib Dem blogger).

One Liberal Democrat candidate I won't be voting for

Andrew Lugovoi, the man accused of murdering Alexander Litvinenko (a constituent of mine) in the radiation poisoning case, should be coming to the UK to face trial on the charges. But instead of being extradited – he is standing for the next Russian Parliament elections for the … Liberal Democratic Party. Needless to say – they are not the sister party of the Lib Dems here!

Brian Coleman puts his foot in it

I see one of my erstwhile colleagues (loose description) at the London Assembly – Tory Brian Coleman – has employed his usual tact and sensitivity to my own local.

Brian, a Conservative London Assembly member, has described Haringey as “ghastly” writing in his blog on the New Statesman website – describing (wrongly!) Haringey as a place “where decent folk lock their car doors as they drive through”.

All one can conclude is that Brian is snobbish, rude, and ill-informed as his remarks show. He is often billed as ‘controversial’ – presumably on account of such insults – but there is a great difference between controversial and ignorant.

My Lib Dem colleague and Leader of the Haringey Liberal Democrat Council group, Neil Williams, put it very well:

“This is exactly why the Tories are so unelectable in our borough. Haringey is a great place and a vibrant and cosmopolitan community – and that is exactly the way we locals like it.

“It’s the same old nasty Tories. They have no idea what Haringey is like and should be ashamed of their comments.”

Of course – the good news – is that there are no Tories at all on Haringey Council – and indeed – Tories came fourth at the last local elections and a very distant third at the General Election of 2005. Cause and effect!

What do women dislike about themselves?

Child on a swingIf you ask a woman what she likes least about herself, she will rarely say “I hate my personality”; instead she will say “I hate my teeth”, or thighs, or some other physical attribute … and that was the theme I talked about in Brighton last week (at party conference) at the Girl Guides fringe meeting to mark the launch of their report “Under ten and under pressure” about the pressures our modern way of life and society puts on young girls:

We all have a hard time growing up. Some of it really painful. Much of it to do with will I be liked? Will boys ask me out? And even if they do –that never really assuages the self doubt. And even if it does – just wait until you next see the TV, read a newspaper or pick up a magazine. Look younger now. Be slimmer tomorrow. The pressure to be self-conscious and anxious about your image is nearly relentless – and that much harder to deal with the younger you are.

We – and by this I mean society as a whole – have a tendency to measure self-esteem through external factors. This is also reinforced in the Opinion Leader Research which shows girls’ self-esteem to be intrinsically linked with having strong and supportive friendship groups.

So what kind of identity does Western society offer to women and girls? And why does this lead to such dramatic problems of self-esteem, such as depression and eating disorders?

The rest of the speech is up on my website.

Are your DNA records safe with the government?

Reading through last week’s newspaper articles – at last – I find that finally the cavalry is joining my campaign to stop innocent people’s DNA being stored in
perpetuity by the police on the national DNA database – and even The Sun has given the story a decent write-up. Hurrah!

And if you’re wondering – “but what does an innocent person have to fear?” – then the answer is “plenty!” as I wrote in an article titled What do the innocent have to fear from a DNA database? on my website.