What's happening to Alexandra Park School?

Came home after Westminster Hour to ponder how to help Alexandra Park School (APS). Out of the blue, and after they had been told there were no more bills to come, the school has been presented with a bill for over £400,000 for alleged ‘variations’ in the PFI contract going back up to seven years. Similar bills are with several other Haringey PFI schools.

This is on top of an expected increase of £120,000 in the annual PFI charge for the future. As the school is already managing its way out of an agreed deficit budget caused by earlier under-funding this news is not welcome – to say the least!

Haringey Council has been predictably useless, though all the schools signed up to PFI at the Labour Council’s insistence. George Meehan (Labour leader of Haringey Council) thinks he can find a few grand here and there or persuade the Government to cough up a bit more and expects the schools to make staff cuts to find the rest.

I am in receipt of a long and excellent letter from the Chair of Governors at APS, one paragraph of which I quote:

3 The Governing Body has not been notified, or given any detail, about the items that apparently now make up these ‘previous years’ variations,’ currently estimated at £414K for APS, or the rate at which these have been charged. It has no basis to confirm that these current costs relate to instructions by the school to vary agreed building plans and no evidence to support such a claim. In fact the Governing Body and the school had every reason to believe that any PFI variation costs that had been incurred had been fully discharged.

This is really too much for any school to tolerate and I fear this demonstrates only the start of PFI chickens coming home to roost in Haringey. I will try to get a meeting with the Head and Chair of Governors as soon as possible.

Campaigning in the sky

It was another local Liberal Democrat campaign day today, and this time I was off to Wood Green and Noel Park.

My main allotted patch was Sky City – above Wood Green Shopping City. It is always so weird going up there as you suddenly find yourself up and away in a city in the sky, with paved external walks just like a normal estate – but you are on top of the shops.

Anyway – very successful – and we all came back for our now traditional after action lunch at the Three Compasses pub! And the sun shone.

How my appearance on Sky went

Crack of dawn it was off to Highgate Village to get ALL the Sunday papers ahead of my first paper review on Sky with Adam Boulton and John Kampfner (New Statesman). I wanted the papers in good time to have a decent look through them. The main story I raised was the appalling tale from The Observer about how the Government is trying to hide the true cost of identity cards.

Now, nice Gordon has been trying to convince us all he’ll be a new broom, all open and transparent – and goodbye to the days of New Labour spin. But put to the test – he’s decided he wants to keep the costs of ID cards secret. Not such a new broom after all!

We also roamed over Gordon’s desire to bring back the argument over detention without charge. Show me evidence, real evidence – and I will vote to protect my countrymen with an extension. But last time it was a lot of hot air and bravado – but not a single shred of solid evidence that 90 days is needed.

John Kampfner rather outshone me on the Russian stories I thought – but then he was Moscow correspondent and has written a book on Yeltsin’s Russia – so he should know more than me!

And then there was Joanna Lumley – confronting a man with a gun in a bar! Living up to her pre-Ab Fab role of Purdy in the Avengers – well nearly – apparently the gun fell on the floor and she kept the man talking until the police arrived. Go Joanna!

Which way for Islam?

That’s Are those extreme Muslims numerous or few in number? How representative are the severe voices of more general feeling? Those are the doubts (and yes – even fears) that many non-Muslims have when confronted with such views.the topic of my latest newspaper column – for Asian Voice this time:

When I conduct my surgeries (where people come to meet me to raise issues), I have one of my assistants with me to take notes. It so happens this is usually a man.

More often than not, when an older Muslim gentleman comes to see me, he will address his remarks to my male assistant.

And no matter how many times I say to him that I am the Member of Parliament and that the man is my assistant – he will almost automatically immediately return to addressing his remarks to my assistant.

You can read the full article on my website.

Which way for Islam?

I was listening to Nick Ferrari (LBC Radio) the other morning – the morning it was reported that a Fatwa had been issued against Nilofar Bakhtiar, the Pakistan tourism minister. She had been doing a parachute jump to raise money for charity for the victims of the Pakistan earthquake. On landing, she hugged her male instructor who had done the jump with her. The published photograph of this offended a group of clerics who demanded she be sacked for immoral behaviour and issued the Fatwa. She offered to resign – criticising the lack of support from fellow ministers – but (at time of writing) her resignation has been rejected by the Prime Minister, who now says she has the government’s backing.

The question Ferrari was posing was – how does Islam sit with the modern world? A member of the Muslim Council of Great Britain came on air and made some good points. He thought the criticisms of the minister were ridiculous – and pointed out that “Muslims” aren’t all one group who think alike, and indeed the Muslim population in Britain is on the whole more moderate and modern.

He also pointed out all nations have ‘out of the ordinary’ members of society such as (to take a Christian example) Jehovah’s Witnesses – who won’t allow a blood transfusion even if it means dying.

So – just as it would be wrong to extrapolate from their views to those of other Christians on the role of modern medicine and modern science, we should be careful about labelling all Muslims with the views of a small group too.

But there is a difference – and that is that extreme Muslims often also argue that their views should be imposed on everyone else too. Are those extreme Muslims numerous or few in number? How representative are the severe voices of more general feeling? Those are the doubts (and yes – even fears) that many non-Muslims have when confronted with such views.

In my own experience, those severe voices are in the very small minority amongst the Muslim population in the UK. But also, many non-Muslims know very few, if any, Muslims – and so when their attention is caught by the more extreme views (and aren’t they always the most attention grabbing?), fear comes in. Both sides of the equation – Muslim and non-Muslim – have a responsibility to break down those barriers of ignorance and fear.

For the Muslim population – that does mean accepting that living in this country means taking part at times in the whole community, and not just becoming a community apart that only interacts with itself (and I would apply just the same standard to – e.g. – English expats living in Spain). And it does also mean having a better acceptance of the standards and realities in the rest of the community.

I have one, instructive, experience of my own in this regard. When I conduct my surgeries (where people come to meet me to raise issues), I have one of my assistants with me to take notes. It so happens this is usually a man. More often than not, when an older Muslim gentleman comes to see me, he will address his remarks to my male assistant. And no matter how many times I say to him that I am the Member of Parliament and that the man is my assistant – he will almost automatically immediately return to addressing his remarks to my assistant.

So: the question mark is which path will Islam take ultimately? Will tradition or modernisation be the way forward?

(c) Lynne Featherstone, 2007

EXCLUSIVE: What Haringey Council really wants to do with Parkland Walk

Well, well, well! So when the hundred and fifty or so residents who came to the recent Area Assembly asked Haringey Council whether the fact that the funding for Parkland Walk came from Transport for London’s cycling department meant that they wanted increased cyclists and increased speeds and the Council said no – they were comprehensively mislead (and that is a polite term) – and the Labour councillors present just sat their silent.

How do I know we were misled? Well – I’ve bunged in a freedom of information request to see what (Labour-run!) Haringey Council really said in its bid submission to Transport for London and the results have just come back.

And the bid from the Council actually says that Haringey Council wants to increase cycling speeds on the Parkland Walk through “decreasing journey times for cyclists” and to “increase in the number of people cycling”.

From the details of the bid, Haringey Council clearly have been given this money to turn the Parkland Walk into a cycle speedway – but they haven’t admitted this to residents. Now – I could point to a hundred roads in the borough where the cycling provision is poor to dangerous and yet Haringey went for £400,000 for a cycling speedway that’s clearly quite inappropriate for Parkland Walk. The Council should have consulted residents before (yes – before you make the decision, that’s what really consultation means) they entered into this pact with Transport for London.

This issue just runs and runs!

Note: You can still take part in my online survey on the future of Parkland Walk.

Is this the future of dentistry?

Hot Lynne Featherstone MP opens Denchic in Crouch Endweather – not much choice of suitable clothing on inspecting wardrobe. Anyway – off today to open ‘Denchic‘ Dental Spa. Not sure what this will be – but when I get there am just delighted to find such a beautifully designed place. This new idea is designed to take the fear out of dentistry, with not just expertise but also and absolutely beautiful surroundings (design is rather a thing of mine – and the benefits of good design are far too often overlooked!).

Anyway – this lovely ‘dental spa’ (which is private) is a great new small business for Crouch End. There is a good NHS dental practise just up the road – but not everyone can get an NHS dentist any more. The place is the long-cherished plan and dream for two exiled Iranians, who lived in Sweden for many years – met in dental college there and came to Britain around ten years ago. They are married with one son – Sam – who was running around at the opening – very excited. Kian and Cath Nikdel are absolutely lovely people and they have clearly poured their heart and soul into this venture.

This sort of excellence, with lots of thought and care given to what it is like for the patient, should also act as a spur to the NHS – as those are the standard we should aspire to for everyone through the NHS too. Easier to say than do mind…

Met a local author and playwright at the opening, Max Arthur. He has just had his play, Forgotten Voices (about the First World War), accepted and put on for six weeks at the Riverside Studios, Hammersmith. So that’s something else to celebrate!

Cleaning the Litvinenko house

Yesterday it was off to meet London Turkish Radio after my surgery at Wood Green library – they are next door. Kelami Dedezade (Chair) and Erkan Patirmacioglue (Managing Director) were my hosts. There is a huge Turkish speaking community in London – and LTR operated a 24-hour program – which is quite something.

After that, next up was pursuing Haringey Council as to what stage the ‘character survey’ on the Litvinenko house has reached. The current situation as I understand it is that the specialist survey company who were going in to assess the risk and levels left in the house of the Pollonium 210 did go in last week and were in there for three days. The results should be completed within three weeks and I have asked the Council to inform me of those results as soon as they are out.

It looks like there’ll still be an issue over who pays for the clean up of the house. The Council has made it clear it will not pay. The Government has made it clear they will not pay. I have just had a letter from Ruth Kelly telling me that it is the house owner’s responsibility to pay. Maybe so. However, as the local MP my concern is the well-being – both mental and physical – of those living near the house. One such neighbour has a baby – and when I sat in their back garden the windows of the Litvinenko house were only a few metres away. If that was me – I would want the house certified clear and clean of radiation before I relaxed about it.

I will write back to Ruth Kelly, for whilst I accept that it may very well be the house owner’s responsibility – I want to know what action both Haringey Council will take and the Government will take if the house owner does not act to clean the house.

How do you stop developers in your neighbourhood?

Congratulations to Benji Lesser and co for putting paid to developers trying to bung non-social housing in the space between the back gardens around Priory Road. They have seen off planning applications in the past, but this time – the surrounding residents have clubbed together and bought a plot of land – saving it from development. Well done!

The bigger picture issue remains – the fact that developers still virtually have a charter for development, with the presumption being so strongly in favour of development – and the developer has right of reply against a refusal whereas poor old residents have no right of appeal if things go the developer’s way. I continue to campaign to right this wrong!

Appearing on 18 Doughty Street

It was off to 18 Doughty Street on Thursday night to do the two hour stint from 10 – midnight. Haven’t done this particular slot before. My co-panel comprise Steve Richards (The Independent), Julian Glover (Guardian leader writer) and Phil Hendren (Dizzy Thinks blog) and of course Iain Dale.

Really enjoyable session. Great to hear Steve graciously concede that this new media era is the way forward – him having previously been a doubter. What Steve said was right – the old, format-weary, predictable diet of mainstream politics programs is looking very tired by comparison.

We roamed over bullying Catholics to not vote for politicians who support abortion; the ethics of the media campaign around Madeleine McCann; the Tory grammar school debacle, and the size of men’s private parts – yes – blame Iain! Anyway – hugely enjoyable!