Liberal Democrats demand action on empty homes

Haringey Liberal Democrats are supporting a campaign focusing on the unacceptable numbers of empty properties across London. London Week of Action on Empty Homes (9th July 2007 – 13th July 2007) encourages residents in Haringey to report vacant property to a hotline number and urges Local Authorities, private owners, and others to take positive action to bring empty property back into use. Latest figures show there are 3,260 empty homes in Haringey and 1,275 of those have been empty for more than six months.

Lib Dems highlight the crippling shortage of housing in Haringey that blights the lives of so many entering the borough and for those who have to live in sub-standard or overcrowded housing. Lib Dems seek to encourage the Labour-run Haringey Council to consider taking firm action to encourage landlords to repair properties for these to be let and used.

Cllr Catherine Harris, Lib Dem Housing Spokesperson comments:

“Haringey is experiencing a chronic shortage of housing. It is a crying shame that people throughout the borough are experiencing overcrowded and sub-standard accommodation whilst houses lie empty. I hope Haringey Council will consider taking action to encourage landlords to repair and let out empty properties as soon as possible, so that those in housing need can be assisted.”

Lynne Featherstone, MP for Hornsey and Wood Green, adds:

“This is a shocking statistic given the horrendous local waiting list and thousands of families waiting to be homed. Haringey needs to pull its finger out and do all that it feasibly can to bring these urgently needed homes back into use.”

PMQs

Brown was a great deal better today than last week – and followed PMQs with a draft Queen’s Speech. Innovation – the ability to discuss and disseminate proposals before the Queen’s Speech – or does the PM just want his manifesto out there for an autumn election which gets called before the actual Queen’s Speech? Hmmmmmmm.

Then it was the Tory Opposition Day debates. There was a tepid motion, apple pie against which it was impossible to vote – however, it was based on the report by Iain Duncan Smith. In fact, I went to record for the Week at Westminster to discuss the ‘back to basics’ marriage proposals of the Tories with Diane Abbot and Nadine Dorries. Needless to say – Nadine supported her Tory colleagues and tried valiantly but unsuccessfully to argue that the £20 per week for married couples was the answer to all our ills. Diane and I were on the other side on this one.

To me – ludicrous to go backwards and propose a 19th century solution to a 21st century problem. Yes – we all agreed that having two parents in situ was the optimum (although only Nadine thought they had to be married not just cohabiting) but Diane and I recognise the world we live in – not make believe. That genie isn’t going back in the bottle – not for Tories or anyone. It was a fun knock around – better than having the boys in! Then I returned and sat in the last half hour of the debate itself – but listening to Tories bang the marriage drum just makes me wonder whether they have changed at all!

International Development Questions in Parliament

International Development Questions – so I thought I asked an interesting question of our new Secretary of State. Sadly, it got a competent answer but not an interesting one. This is the exchange:

Lynne Featherstone (Hornsey and Wood Green) (LD): I welcome the Secretary of State to his role and wish him well. The stringent restrictions of movement that are imposed on the Palestinians continue to exacerbate the humanitarian position. They undermine all the aid and humanitarian work that is going on. What will the Secretary of State do to persuade Israel to remove those restrictions?

Mr. Alexander: When my right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary last addressed the House, he made clear the three principles whereby we will move our work forward on the matter in the months ahead. He said that first, we would be unyielding in our support for finding a two-state solution; secondly, we should express a genuine willingness to work with all those who would renounce violence as a way forward; and thirdly, we need to continue to address the immediate humanitarian challenge while recognising the social and economic development needs of the Palestinians. It is right to place on record the fact that restraints on movement and access are a severe constraint on the capacity of the Palestinian economy to grow.

Although, of course, it is necessary to provide humanitarian assistance with immediate effect, there is no substitute in the longer term for a sustainable, developed Palestinian economy. For that to happen, we need the restrictions on movement and access to be removed.

I had been hoping for more. Because the simple mantra of a two-state solution etc (albeit I agree with it) doesn’t really answer the question I asked.

You see, right now when the Palestinians are having a hideous time in terms of movement, poverty, etc – I don’t think that the most constructive approach is to simply condemn Israel (albeit the wall position and the ongoing settlements are wrong) – but I want to find out what Israel wants, needs or could be persuaded by to remove those restrictions. Let’s try and see what Israel needs and what process would be acceptable. If there is nothing that will ever persuade Israel to lift restrictions through negotiation and agreement – then we would know where we are and can work out perhaps what next steps say the EU might need to take. (They are the biggest aid donor to Palestine and biggest trading partner of Israel). I have always felt that there is a way through this – and the people of both countries desperately need the international community to find this way through and hold both safe on that journey.

A Hoot

My mate Mark Pack has got the Tories going some! Now – as a non-geek – I did have to phone him to ask what astro-turfing was. To elucidate. One Tory – Grant Shapps – stands accused of trying to fake a comment on YouTube which claimed to be from a Liberal Democrat, only was really from him. Tsk tsk!

Now, Iain Dale (who – even though he is a Tory! – I actually quite like and is usually worth reading) seems to have lost his reason and is defending the indefensible. Iain would have us believe that some evil people were using Grant’s easily guessable password. Grant’s meant to be an IT expert, but even I know you shouldn’t set your password to 1234, I mean really! – yet that’s what Iain claims he did – and then that someone guessed it – and then that someone set him up. And then – even better – the story also involves Grant (or his staff) having supposedly spotted a problem a few days ago – but then not changing the password when they did!

So no surprise – reading the comments on Iain’s blog – pretty much no one believes his story. Stop digging seems to be the advice to Grant.

Oh the joy of by-elections!

Planning and Darfur

Start the day meeting all the lobby groups against the Planning White paper. The paper is a developers’ charter – and not only gets it wrong on many counts – but omits huge areas that do need tackling. For me – I want ordinary people, objectors – to have the same right of appeal as developers or applicants. It’s not fair that if you are refused permission you can appeal – but if it is granted and you are an objector – you cannot. Also – another bugbear – is that Her Majesty’s Inspector who doesn’t live in the local area and doesn’t have the same interests as local people – can overturn a decision made by the local Planning Authority. That could do with an overhaul too! (On which point … you can read more in my newspaper column on the topic from a little while back).

Then meeting with Foreign and Commonwealth officers to discuss all my many and various Parliamentary Questions on Darfur. I have raised Darfur in Parliament many times – and it was riveting to discuss the substantive issues with officers who really know the subject and working with those on the ground. Not going to discuss here as the material is something I want to think about how best to use.

Litvinenko update

Well – after Haringey keep forgetting to update me when they promise to – I contacted them. Again! The ‘critical survey’ which measured the Pollonium 210 residue in the Muswell Hill home of the Litvinenkos and the consequent advice on any remediation needed arrived a week or so ago.

There was some time taken over a difference of opinion in terms of how something was calculated between the Health Protection Agency and Corillion – but that didn’t amount to much. There may be a few spots which are just above the safety level – but most of the house has now returned to the levels normally found in the atmosphere.

So – with regard to the hot spots – there was a ‘strategy’ meeting last week about what comes next and what arrangements need to be made for cleaning the house and as ever – who pays will need to be sorted. I am promised a phone call tomorrow.

What's a polyclinic?

Main meeting of the day was with Richard Sumray, Chair of Haringey Primary Care Trust (PCT). For me the key question was around the proposals for Hornsey Hospital which has now become part of the wider Primary Health Care Strategy. This strategy proposes (and is part of the London-wide strategy as well) something like six polyclinics in Haringey.

Hey – what’s this poly thingamajig – I hear you say. Well – it’s a sort of community hospital without beds – i.e. it’s a super, duper, all singing all dancing health facility with clinics for various things like diabetes, services like chiropody, diagnostics and the kitchen sink. I say that – because the array of services proposed for Hornsey Hospital is yet to be consulted on and we hope (despite our experience – so hope against hope) that the services can accommodate what local people want not simply that which is prescribed by the PCT.

There is some confusion around consultation because there is a consultation by the Enfield Haringey Health Trust on the local Primary Care Strategy – which is really with health stakeholders etc and then there is also to be a consultation on Hornsey Hospital itself.

The polyclinics really come up in the Primary Care consultation – and this may contain the key issue which I believe is what loss will there be of our local GP practices as part of the move to polyclinics? The idea is to improve local health services in these new facilities and provide some of things we are used to going to the hospital for nearer to home.

But the polyclinics will need some rental income, I believe, from GP practises based in the polyclinics. Of course – if a local GP practise moves into a polyclinic – it may mean for the ordinary person who is ill, just needs the doctor and a prescription or not without further treatment, a longer journey. That in turn raises issues of travel, access, car usage, parking and public transport connections – all very difficult.

So – on the individuality of each polyclinic – including Hornsey Hospital – Richard promised me that there would be a separate consultation – a continuance of the public meetings twice a year that we all have had on Hornsey since it was closed. I would also wish to put pressure on the consultation to demand that no area of the borough should be denuded of a local GP practice – and that any practise or doctor who wants to move in to a polyclinic ought to consult with their patient list.

The polyclinics sound great – but we have to make sure that local people have a say in what is provided and a say in what happens to their local GP practices and that there is a net gain. Perhaps local people want out of hours services, doctors that will visit in the home (which might solve some of the access issues as you don’t feel like getting on a bus when you are sick), and so on and so on.

There is so much involved in all of these changes – I have to say to people get involved, respond to the consultations. I am happy to have a spanking new facility on the Hornsey Hospital site as has been promised to me and local people for years now – but it has to deliver a great slab of what local people want and not remove the very local doctors that people rely on.

Update: you can read my article subsequent article about polyclinics here.

Wightman Road Mosque

First off on Sunday was speaking at Wightman Road Mosque – as part of an open community day – as they do each year. Wightman Road is an exemplar mosque – friendly, welcoming and open. This reaching out into the community is what we need to disperse fears and unwarranted suspicion of each other. Happily in Haringey – this sort of work that has gone on for years in our joyfully diverse borough by a whole range of groups.

Then a dash to the Priory Avenue backsite opening. Here the fight against developers who would have ruined the space in between back gardens with profit-making squashed houses has been won by local residents. After fighting off planning application after application – eventually the developer realised his best shot was to sell the land to the surrounding home owners. It was Benji Lesser who got everyone together to buy the land. They now own it between them – and we now have our equivalent to those wonderful communal gardens in Kensington where the kids can all play safely and make lifelong friends. This is real community.

And it will be a real beacon to all of those residents fighting developers who land grab behind houses – not for social or affordable housing which is desperately needed – but for profit on the luxury end of the market. Squashing stuff in is not the answer to our housing problems. Well done Benji and team – this is really stirring stories for residents!

Hornsey Depot development: residents left out say Liberal Democrats

Haringey Council’s failure to provide early and effective consultation for local residents on the future of Hornsey Depot has come under severe criticism from local Lib Dems following the Labour Council’s move to rush through a decision in a special meeting of the Council’s Cabinet on 26th July 2007.

The meeting will decide which developer is successful in their bid to redevelop the site. Lib Dems are concerned that the public will be left out of key early decisions and have criticised an invitation to a day of presentations from the short listed developers on the 17th July as a limited and belated attempt to involve councillors. Lib Dems have now asked local residents concerned about the issue to contact them to plug the gap in Haringey Council’s lack of engagement.

Since the end of 2006 Hornsey Liberal Democrat councillors have been demanding that Haringey Council engage in meaningful public consultation. These requests have consistently been rejected by the Labour Council on the basis that once a preferred developer for the site is appointed the developer will be obliged to carry out a pre-planning consultation with local stakeholders. Lib Dems believe this to be too late and feel that Labour’s approach tries to outsource responsibility for the consultation they have failed to undertake.

Cllr Robert Gorrie (Hornsey) comments:

“Labour’s failure to engage with residents early in this process can only make achieving the right outcome for the people of Hornsey more difficult. The benefits of the limited and belated involvement ward Councillors have been offered are not yet clear but it does at least provide us with the opportunity to ask questions on behalf of residents. I would encourage people to contact either myself, Monica or Errol directly as soon as possible with any issues or questions they have about the depot site. We will try to raise their issues and feed back answers.”

Liberal Democrat success on longer Youth Centre opening hours

Young people in Muswell Hill will benefit from longer Youth Centre opening hours following a successful campaign by local councillor and Children and Young People Spokesperson Gail Engert. The centre will now be open three nights a week from 17.00-20.00 hours – Monday, Wednesday and Thursday and due to rise to four nights a week.

Youth attendance at the Youth Centre had declined dramatically over the year and had been plagued by anti social behaviour. Lib Dems continually pushed for the Youth Centre to provide a regular service that interested local youths to help tackle these problems and have praised the current Youth Manager who has implemented many beneficial changes.

Cllr Gail Engert, Lib Dem Children and Young People Spokesperson comments:

“It is so important for an area to have facilities for young people. These need to be regular and interesting activities. Unfortunately the Labour Council does not place enough emphasis on the Youth Service – luckily through Lib Dem pressure and good management of the Centre it is now open for young people to enjoy.”

Lynne Featherstone, MP for Hornsey and Wood Green, adds:

“This is a real step forward for the whole community. Extending the opening hours will hopefully draw in more youths, giving them a safe and creative place to spend time in. It’s a win-win situation.”