Brian Coleman puts his foot in it

I see one of my erstwhile colleagues (loose description) at the London Assembly – Tory Brian Coleman – has employed his usual tact and sensitivity to my own local.

Brian, a Conservative London Assembly member, has described Haringey as “ghastly” writing in his blog on the New Statesman website – describing (wrongly!) Haringey as a place “where decent folk lock their car doors as they drive through”.

All one can conclude is that Brian is snobbish, rude, and ill-informed as his remarks show. He is often billed as ‘controversial’ – presumably on account of such insults – but there is a great difference between controversial and ignorant.

My Lib Dem colleague and Leader of the Haringey Liberal Democrat Council group, Neil Williams, put it very well:

“This is exactly why the Tories are so unelectable in our borough. Haringey is a great place and a vibrant and cosmopolitan community – and that is exactly the way we locals like it.

“It’s the same old nasty Tories. They have no idea what Haringey is like and should be ashamed of their comments.”

Of course – the good news – is that there are no Tories at all on Haringey Council – and indeed – Tories came fourth at the last local elections and a very distant third at the General Election of 2005. Cause and effect!

What do women dislike about themselves?

Child on a swingIf you ask a woman what she likes least about herself, she will rarely say “I hate my personality”; instead she will say “I hate my teeth”, or thighs, or some other physical attribute … and that was the theme I talked about in Brighton last week (at party conference) at the Girl Guides fringe meeting to mark the launch of their report “Under ten and under pressure” about the pressures our modern way of life and society puts on young girls:

We all have a hard time growing up. Some of it really painful. Much of it to do with will I be liked? Will boys ask me out? And even if they do –that never really assuages the self doubt. And even if it does – just wait until you next see the TV, read a newspaper or pick up a magazine. Look younger now. Be slimmer tomorrow. The pressure to be self-conscious and anxious about your image is nearly relentless – and that much harder to deal with the younger you are.

We – and by this I mean society as a whole – have a tendency to measure self-esteem through external factors. This is also reinforced in the Opinion Leader Research which shows girls’ self-esteem to be intrinsically linked with having strong and supportive friendship groups.

So what kind of identity does Western society offer to women and girls? And why does this lead to such dramatic problems of self-esteem, such as depression and eating disorders?

The rest of the speech is up on my website.

Are your DNA records safe with the government?

Reading through last week’s newspaper articles – at last – I find that finally the cavalry is joining my campaign to stop innocent people’s DNA being stored in
perpetuity by the police on the national DNA database – and even The Sun has given the story a decent write-up. Hurrah!

And if you’re wondering – “but what does an innocent person have to fear?” – then the answer is “plenty!” as I wrote in an article titled What do the innocent have to fear from a DNA database? on my website.

Avenue Nursery

Lynne Featherstone MP cutting the tape for the new playgroundOff to Avenue Nursery to open their splendid new playground. Quite an amazing feat – given that all the concrete and building materials had to be brought in by hand by the builder. Previn seems to have decided that this would be done and done well and to time – and it was.

A lovely little ceremony. Mary – the head of the nursery – told us the story of how the work was done and then two of the classes sang a special song for the occasion and individual children from one class read out their own stories of what this new playground meant to them. They loved the surface, the space, not having to put on boots to avoid mud, the toys and so on.

From where I stand, this is a nursery with superb facilities but also with completely dedicated staff who make sure the childrens’ early years are the best they can be; after all – what they experience in these years will be the foundation for the rest of their lives.

Congratulations to all who worked so hard to make this playgound happen!

Gordon Brown's crime shame

One of the main thrusts of my attack on the Government in my keynote speech at Brighton Conference was on corruption and how it provides support for extremists, comfort for terrorists and sucks away the money from the most needy in development terms.

Needless to say, I raised the spectre of BAE and the dropping of the investigation by the Serious Fraud Office. The whole business stinks – and I am proud that the Lib Dems have led on exposing Labour and Tory hypocrisy on this.

But today in the papers I see that the Labour government are now moving to block cooperation with the US enquiry into BAE. It’s come to a pretty poor pass when the US is prepared to investigate and prosecute on bribery and corruption – and our Labour government is ducking and diving. Shame on Gordon Brown.

My appearance in The Sun

So – back from the wilds of Brighton and the Liberal Democrat conference. Just a few ‘tidy ups’ as I was basically blogging by video diary.

I didn’t understand the reference at the time that the Chair, Jon Ball, made to me a one of the four Lib Dem Sun ‘lovelies’ when he introduced my keynote speech on Wednesday. Coming home – some kind person (!) has emailed me the link – and there I am with Jo Swinson (27), Julia Goldsworthy (29) and Kirsty Williams (36). Sadly – they do publish my age! Still – whereas I used to just rail against the innate sexism in such articles – now (at my advanced age) I am just grateful!

More seriously, on the last morning, the speaker who summated in the Liberal Democrat Youth and Students Emergency Motion on Darfur, a Darfuri Abdo Abdullah, gave a most powerful speech.

We had had the Global Day of Action on Darfur on the Monday (blogged about by one of the organisers here). But there is nothing more powerful to advocate both the need for speed of deployment of the AU/UN hybrid force and the need for our government to stop sending Darfuris back to torture and murder – then someone standing in front of you who has seen his own family murdered.

I spoke in this debate and of course, made Darfur one of the key issues in my keynote speech the day before – but will the Government act? Brown says he wants troops deployed earlier than next year. Given he is Prime Minister, he has the power to push it – but he seems satisfied with warm words alone. Cold comfort to dying Darfuris.

You can see more of my conference photos over on Flickr.

Outrage at Brian Coleman's attack on Haringey

Local Liberal Democrats have expressed shock and disgust at comments made by the most senior Conservative London Assembly member, describing Haringey as “ghastly”. Controversial Tory assembly member Brian Coleman, writing in his blog on the New Statesman website, this week portrays Haringey as a place “where decent folk lock their car doors as they drive through”.

Cllr Neil Williams, Leader of Haringey Lib Dems, comments:

“This is exactly why the Tories are so unelectable in our borough. Haringey is a great place and a vibrant and cosmopolitan community – and that is exactly the way we locals like it.

“It’s the same old nasty Tories. They have no idea what Haringey is like and should be ashamed of their comments. It’s appalling to hear a senior Tory insulting the area.”

“The fact that Mr Coleman would also like to see Maggie back is another indication of his lack of faith in Cameron’s Conservatives – not to mention sheer delusion on his part. It all goes to show that a Conservative vote is a wasted vote here in Haringey.”

Campsbourne residents suffering from years of Labour neglect

Residents in Hornsey are not getting a fair deal when it comes to security improvements, says a local Lib Dem councillor. Robert Gorrie says that the lack of investment in the security in some of Haringey’s housing estates has resulted in a failure to get on top of anti-social behaviour on the Campsbourne estate, while other areas secure generous security spending.

Information uncovered by the Lib Dems shows the striking contrast between the investment in CCTV cameras in different areas. The Campsbourne estate has two CCTV cameras, one of which has been vandalised, compared to Broadwater Farm estate, which has 158 cameras representing an investment of £570,000. Lib Dems have criticised the Haringey Council’s uneven approach to funding and has called for more investment in areas like the Campsbourne, to improve resident safety.

Lib Dems acknowledge that the Campbourne is smaller than Broadwater Farm but over the last two years more anti-social behaviour incidents have been reported there than in Broadwater Farm.

Cllr Robert Gorrie (Hornsey) comments:

“Residents are committed to making the Campsbourne a successful and safer place to live. Unfortunately they have been let down by Haringey Council and Homes for Haringey. It is about time that their shallow enthusiasm for photo opportunities and vague expressions of concern at meetings is replaced by clear action and delivery.

“If the Campsbourne is a third the size of Broadwater Farm then how about the Council spending £200,000 on installing 50 CCTV cameras on the estate? That would be fair, and it might be a sign of real commitment to the residents.”

Cllr Ron Aitken, Lib Dem Crime spokesperson, adds:

“CCTV is not necessarily the solution to all crime or anti social behaviour issues but the stark comparison between the two estates does highlight the dreadful lack of resources the Labour Council has invested in addressing the issues on the Campsbourne.”

Making international development a domestic issue

Speech given at Brighton Party Conference, 2007

Looking around the hall, I think a very good number of us pay a fair attention to international news on the TV and give money to overseas charities or emergency appeals.

And I’m sure you’d find good support in this hall for Britain to spend more overseas.

Yet when you look at the scale of deprivation and disasters around the world – this isn’t enough.

The rules of the game have to change!

We need to recognise that one of the big problems with effective foreign aid is that the most effective development projects are the small scale and local – like solar cookers.

But these small scale projects don’t scale up well to making a difference to a whole population, to a whole country or to a whole region.

So what is to be done?

The answer is to supplement the successful small-scale with a focus on preventing the large-scale disasters that can sweep away decades of good work and progress.

Sometimes these are acts of nature which we cannot control. But there are ones we can.

They are the 3Cs: corruption, conflict, climate change

Three areas where Britain is failing to play its responsible role in the world. Three areas where the means to bring about change lie close to hand and close to home. Three areas where Gordon Brown has been failing.

Let’s take corruption first.

Corruption is the source of support for many extremists. It makes it easier for terrorists to find support. It sucks money away from development and those in need.

We should not underestimate the extent to which corruption happens locally – within countries – and needs local solutions. And our colonial baggage is something we need to be wary of.

But Britain is closely entwined in far too much of corruption. So we should tread sensitively – but certainly not be put off by the cynical shouts of “racism” by the likes of Mugabe

So when Gordon Brown next talks about being tough on crime – challenge him as to why some crimes are ok to let go by?

Al Yamamah to name but one – billions in arms sales to Saudi, money in Swiss bank accounts etc. Oh but – I forgot – that’s a crime that’s ok to let pass.

The whole business stinks. I am proud that our party has led the way in exposing Labour and the Tory hypocrisy on it.

It is hypocritical to the point of comedy when the British Government lectures Africans about corruption in the wake of Al-Yamamah.

But Al Yamamah is not the only problem.

When Nigerian dictator General Sani Abacha was looting billions from Nigeria, where did $1.3 billion end up? In 23 London banks. Making profits for the banks – off the backs of the neediest in Nigeria.

Where is your moral outrage Mr Brown when it is the City that is involved in crime?

There is much that is good and honourable done in the City, including the generation of vital wealth and jobs for the country.

But there is also a dark, rotten secret. It’s the complicity with financial crime – and with financial secrecy that is used to hide crime.

The financial secrecy we see with off shore tax havens means they play a key role in so much corruption.

But you know what? The vast majority are based in countries that are closely connected with the UK, being Crown Dependencies or Overseas Territories.

And many of the operations in them are run by the subsidiaries of major international banks that also operate in the UK.

That’s right. The tax havens might not be within the immediate reach of a memo from 10. But there’s no doubt that the British Prime Minister can wield massive influence to tackle them.

If he wishes.

If he really wants to be tough on crime – and not just the sorts of crime that get tabloid newspaper headlines.

So the UK must do more to put pressure on our companies, our financial systems, our Crown dependencies and our overseas territories.

And in all of this back scratching – a nasty species has arisen – the Vulture Fund.

An appropriate name if ever there was one.

Fat cats purchase a sovereign country’s debt and chase it aggressively. It’s not illegal but it sure don’t smell too sweet.

Clues to smelling a rat:

Vulture Funds are secretive.

Vulture Funds won’t admit who owns them.

Vulture Funds hide in tax havens.

And although they won’t tell us who they really are or pay our taxes – they’re happy to use our British courts to extract money from developing countries.

We should say – if you want to use our courts – then you must play by our rules. And our rules should say there is a line between legitimate secondary debt and screwing the most vulnerable .

And we should vigorously back the back World Bank’s asset recovery program.

And we should fully support for OECD convention against bribery!

Take Part 12 of the 2001 Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act.

It was meant to tackle overseas corruption – except that it doesn’t apply to the non-UK subsidiaries of UK companies.

Well, those UK companies are here on our doorstep.

Why should we give them a free bye to do what they want with their overseas subsidiaries regardless of what the law says?

If you think the UK’s record on prosecutions for international bribery is ok, just consider this one point.

It’s worse than the US’s record under George W Bush.

Scary!

And when we talk about George W – Iraq comes to mind.

Now – Iraq highlights vividly the problems that violent conflict within a country brings.

And conflict isn’t confined to the country itself. Refugees flee across borders and violence spills over into other countries.

And there is a similarly bleak picture in Darfur.

80% of the world’s 20 poorest countries have endured major conflict in the last 15 years.

Conflict – the second of the three C’s – wrecks years of development progress – nearly overnight – and leaves a long and painful legacy.

For example, over half of the 77 million children of school age around the world who are not in school are from conflict affected fragile states. That damage to education will have a long-lasting impact – generations without the education or skills to recover from the devastation that years of conflict brings.

Hundreds of thousands of Darfuris have been murdered in the past three years due to the measures taken against them by the Government of Sudan and allied militias. But our government remains unwilling to push for and take part in decisive action.The hybrid AU – UN peace-keeping force must be deployed. The UN has finally resolved it. President Bashir has at least said he will permit it. But not for months and months.

The situation in Darfur needs urgent action – not the slow languid ticking-away of month after month of meetings. Prime Minister Brown should be pushing China to use its powerful influence on the Khartoum government to bring that date forward.

We are, after all, very much looking forward to the Beijing Olympic Games – are we not? Well – let China fear international embarrassment and hostility just as it is wanting to put its best face on to the world.

We need to stop the genocide now. We need to stop it – not only to stop the killing but in order to save any slim possibility of Sudan and Darfur having a successful future in our lifetimes.

If we fail in this it sends out a damning message about what our role in the world has become.

That is why the Liberal Democrats are backing targeted disinvestment – to pressurize the Sudanese government – but by choosing to target specific companies in Sudan that are clearly supporting the genocide in Darfur – not stopping all trade with Sudan.

And again we see that this is part of a wider regional problem, spilling over into Chad, Ethiopia, Somalia and other states in east Africa.

Widespread failure of states has left development dreams in tatters in many places, and is providing fertile breeding grounds and bases for international terrorism.

A good example of where international issues have repercussions right here at home.

So we must take an active role in pushing for international solutions – and for making international institutions more effective, maybe even too reviving Paddy Ashdown’s idea of a UN Staff College to make the UN’s military interventions more effective.

And let us not kid ourselves about the causes of conflict. Read my lips. It’s resources stupid. Energy supply and water. Those are the battlegrounds conflicts to come.

Darfur’s increasing desertification is a key driver of the conflict there. And that battle over the worlds scarce resources brings me to the last of the three C’s: corruption, conflict and the daddy of them all- climate change

Climate change is rapidly becoming the biggest threat not only to us but even more so to the developing world.

Those very parts of the globe that have done least to bring about climate change will suffer the most.

When the earth is poisoned by the ‘developed West’, when we – yes us here in Britain do our part to destroy this fragile ecosystem in which we live – there is one simple consequence.

It is the poorest that suffer. The poorest that die.

In Kenya there have been biblical-scale droughts – millions displaced, and huge numbers of cattle & camels have died. Many rivers have dried up – so whole villages have been devastated; 3.5 million people have been affected, including half a million schoolchildren. The consequences are too large to even imagine.

Another example is in Bangladesh where much of the country lives in the flood plains of two rivers, the Brahmaputra and the Ganges. The latest floods left 1000 people dying and 19 million people displaced when these rivers burst their banks.I could go on. But sadly I’m sure you all know the picture already.

We must face up to our responsibility of how we are complicit in hurting the developing world.

This means radically and drastically cutting our impact on the globe – we need a powerful Climate Change bill with real teeth.

But just as important is helping the developing world with green energy generation.

Let’s us be both ambitious and optimistic, particularly for sub-Saharan Africa. An area of great poverty and so often little progress. It is an area of huge potential for solar power. We have seen what wealth the oil era has brought many formerly poor areas of the world. Let’s aim for the era of green energy to spread those benefits more widely – and support the development of green energy.

And we need to help deliver improved infrastructure and support agriculture- because as long as our emissions are higher than the developing world we have a responsibility to help developing countries deal, adapt and mitigate the destructive effects of climate change.Climate change for which we are so complicit – and whose impact overseas comes back to impact on us – when it triggers wars, when it drives up the prices of our imported raw materials and when it triggers flows of people across the globe – including towards the UKI have talked about the three big challenges we face: corruption, conflict and climate change.

In addressing them, it is so so easy to simply say that, well, we are all fellow humans. We’re part of the same global community. We should care about suffering overseas just as we care about it here at home.

But those are the easy sentiments to express – looking to ourselves, expressing internationalist sentiments we feel comfortable with and just vaguely wishing others held them too.

The real challenge is to persuade those who don’t agree with those sentiments. Those who don’t really care about people in another continent, in another country, or quite possibly even on the other side of their street.

That’s why I have drawn some of the connections between what happens overseas and what happens in the UK.

Whether it is international corruption that feeds the discontent on which terrorists feed; or international climate change that drives up immigration and asylum pressures for our own country; or international conflict that drives up the prices of imports – the real challenge is to make the connection between what happens in other countries and what happens to us here at home, in our own jobs, own homes and our own families.

The real challenge is to make international development a domestic issue.