David Blunkett

It’s a bummer when you have to go to a black tie do straight from work.

Should I wear my ball gown to City Hall all day, go home and change or take it to work and change? Happily, I don’t have a ball gown and have got this down to a fine art. I wear a black (reasonably nice) suit to work with normal t-shirt – and then change the t-shirt for a frilly evening top and in a twinkling – I can go to the ball.

Actually, it’s not a ball, but the Stephen Lawrence Charitable Trust dinner at the Dorchester, and yes I have declared it (or asked my PA to) in the declarations of hospitality accepted. It was a fantastic evening and I hope it raised lots of money for the trust which is doing incredible work.

They had there the students who are in receipt of bursaries to study architecture and it was incredibly moving to see that out of the appalling murder of Stephen has come some real good.

It was quite a line-up of speakers and guests. Outside of the trustees, there was a bevy of cabinet ministers including Blunkett and even Cherie Blair put in an appearance. Of course, everyone was staring at Blunkett.

I can’t imagine what it is like to have to go to such a high profile do in the middle of all the furore going on about his love life and visa doings. To his credit, as he went up to speak, his first line was ‘I am seeking popularity…’ It raised a laugh – but his problems won’t go away.

Paul Boateng gave one of the weirdest speeches I have ever heard. I don’t know if that is his usual style of delivery but I have never heard such a bizarre delivery. Jack Straw was Jack Straw. The real star was Doreen Lawrence. She is just a fantastic woman.

The invite said ‘carriages at 2.00 am’. Well – I don’t have a carriage and 2 is way past my bedtime – so I left at midnight. Telling my children about the evening later when I got home – I mentioned that the Fame Academy star Lemar was there. Forget Blunkett and Cherie – I was in the doghouse for not getting his autograph.

Sutton and Haringey

Meet a woman at Harringay Station. I’ve done a lot of work to get this and other stations in Haringey improved – particularly getting them cleaned up. She’d written to me about graffiti problems at the station, so we met to take a look. She took me down to the platform and showed me the whole of the facing wall to the platform covered in graffiti.

Platform graffiti which adorns the walls coming into most stations in London is a hard nut to crack – but one that I am keen to continue to apply pressure to.

I have now contacted WAGN to see if they will remove the graffiti which has clearly not been touched since 1996 – some kind tagger was thoughtful enough to write the year for all to see.

Later in the day off to Sadlers Wells! Sadly not to see a performance but to give a presentation on the Hump Report which I and my transport committee produced earlier this year.

What a beautiful setting – the glass wall of the theatre lit with tiny white lights and the aspect of London beyond.

Road humps always provoke people. Let us be clear – the findings were overwhelming that they save lives and serious injuries – but they are not the only nor necessarily the best tool for traffic calming. (You can read more about it in the column I wrote at the time).

There was a woman there who was speaking after me from the Transport Laboratory and she was telling me beforehand that they are now working on psychological barriers to speeding – i.e. if a driver thinks it is dangerous and likely to kill him/her they will slow down. Sounds a good approach to me.

I leave Sadlers directly after my bit as I have to make my way across London to Sutton as guest speaker at Sutton LibDems AGM.

Graham Tope has been the best mentor a politician could have and I later embarrass him by telling the massed ranks of Sutton LibDems that this is the case.

Graham met me at Sutton station. As we walked through Sutton town centre it was a bit like being in that old TV series ‘The Prisoner’. Everything looked pristine, and shiny and well designed. Lovely murals and artistic railings, clean pedestrianised streets with nice shops and lovely lighting. A world away from many parts of Haringey where I hail from. However, apparently local residents did not always see it as the shining example I did. I would like them to come to Haringey (Labour run) and see that even our ‘nice’ high streets cannot compare.

I deliver a sort of round up on the London Assembly and the Mayor – the GLA world according to Lynne – and it seems to go down well.

FEATHERSTONE PRESSES COUNCIL OVER MUSWELL HILL ROAD SAFETY

Lib Dem councillor for Muswell Hill Lynne Featherstone has secured assurances from Haringey Council that they will seek funding for a vehicle-activated speeding sign along busy Muswell Hill Road, N10.

The news comes after persistent pressure from Cllr Featherstone over the last year. She has been contacted by local residents concerned at speeding vehicles, particularly those with wide wheel bases that can avoid the existing speed humps.

Cllr Featherstone had originally pressed the London Borough of Haringey to secure funding for a speed camera, but was told that the London Safety Camera Partnership (LSCP), who fund the installation of speed cameras, had said that the area did not meet the criteria of four speed-related accidents during the previous three years. However the Council this week confirmed that they would be seeking funding from the LSCP for a vehicle-activated sign along the road that would remind speeding motorists of the speed limit.

Cllr Featherstone, although disappointed that a speed camera will not be installed, is pleased that other measures are being looked at to address speeding in the road.

Cllr Lynne Featherstone (Muswell Hill) comments:

“I am pleased the Council has taken the speeding problem seriously and is trying to find ways to improve the situation. I have received many complaints from residents and I will continue to press for action until we see a marked reduction in speeding.”

LIB DEMS SECURE ASSURANCES OVER 101 PLAYGROUP

Lib Dem Councillor for Stroud Green Laura Edge has secured a verbal assurance from the Haringey Council that playgroups will not face a 300% increase in their rates in the next financial year as originally proposed. The news comes just two weeks after Lib Dems vowed to fight Haringey Council’s policy change, which would see playgroups and other community associations charged market rates for leasing council property.

In a question made at the Council’s watchdog Overview and Scrutiny meeting on Monday (22nd November), Cllr Edge asked the Council’s lead member for finance to reassure the committee that the Council would safeguard the future of the 101 playgroup, which had been facing closure.

In response Cllr Milner said that they were looking to “smooth the position” and that it “would not be the case” that playgroups such as 101 would face the kind of increases they are currently facing.

Cllr Edge has welcomed the assurance that a solution will be announced within the next 2-3 weeks. However she says that until a satisfactory outcome is achieved she will continue to fight to safeguard the future of vital community services like the 101 playgroup.

Cllr Laura Edge comments: “I am pleased that it appears we have convinced the Council that charging playgroups market rates is a bad idea. Playgroups such as 101 provide a vital service to the community and should be not face such extortionate rate increases. I hope that Council’s solution reflects this feeling.”

Dodgy or what?

‘Hopefully you are going to Parliament so I will not have to put up with your questions much longer.’

Thus spoke Ken at last Mayor’s Question Time. The Mayor clearly no longer loves me!

Ken’s ‘dear john’ came at Mayor’s Question Time when I was pushing him intensively on the 152 million fares dodged since he took office. That’s 132,000 per day. True to form, whenever the questioning going gets rough – Ken likes to change the subject.

However, I wasn’t in the mood for jollity. £40 million was lost this year on the buses and £43 million on the tube. Given Ken is breaking his promises not to raise fares above inflation and is going to break his promises in each of the next three years as well as this one – the least he can do is make more of an effort to crack down on those who dodge fares.

In recent weeks I have become an expert on fare dodging – not through practising the dark art – but by being forced to pursue a Mayor who does not appear to care half as much about catching fare dodgers as raising fares for those who are honest and pay them.

Currently, Revenue Inspectors are catching only about one in seven hundred dodgers. I doubt whether Ken would be equally sanguine if only one out of every seven hundred evaders of the Congestion Charge were caught and prosecuted.

I suggested to him that he ought to double the £10 penalty currently levied on fare dodgers – a charge so derisory that it apparently isn’t worth the time and effort to pursue. The Mayor should put fare dodging on a par with transgressing into a bus lane, evading the Congestion Charge or running over on a meter – and double the penalty charge for dodging to £20 which if not paid promptly, should double and then double again – like all the other charges now levied on Londoners. Sauce for the goose etc.

There’s a particular problem with the ‘bendy buses’ and the number of doors they have – which are not all by the driver. Some people seem to feel no need to buy a ticket as they can board the bus away from the driver (and there are no conductors). Already radio jocks have christened these huge new vehicles the ‘free’ bus. But where’s the action from the Mayor? Ken needs to implement an intense and high profile anti-fare dodging campaign targeted on people who seem to think they really are ‘free’ buses.

Ken was annoyed with the term ‘free bus’ – but action would be even better.

One aspect of the issue he wouldn’t or couldn’t answer is how the targets for the Revenue Protection Inspectors really work. Now, I’ve been told that they are given a target number of tickets to check (rather than evaders to catch). This means there’s actually an incentive on them not to catch any evaders – as finding an evader slows them down as they have to deal with it.

Another one is – what’s been the impact on ticket revenue where Routemasters have been replaced by bendy buses?

Both fair questions in my book – and ones a London Mayor who was really on top of the job would be able to handle. But he didn’t. I’ve more hope for the meeting I have scheduled with the Director of Surface Transport at Transport for London next week. I’ll get a chance to follow up on these then.

So Mayor Ken may very well wish me gone to another place – but right now – I just want answers!

COUNCILLOR CALLS ON HARINGEY COUNCIL TO TAKE URGENT STEPS TO INCREASE SAFETY IN DENTON ROAD AND WESTON PARK

Stroud Green Liberal Democrat Councillor Laura Edge has again called onHaringey Council to urgently introduce preventative road safety measures inDenton Road (N8) following yet another incident involving a car speeding downthe road and smashing into parked cars and front gardens in Weston Park.

Cllr Edge says that the incident, which took place at 9.50pm on Friday 19November, is yet another in a succession of accidents at this now notoriousblackspot.

The chain of events exactly mirrored two accidents whichhappened within three weeks of each other in January of this year.

Following those incidents, Haringey Council agreed to paint “slow down” signs onthe carriageway in Denton Road but residents and Lib Dem Councillors warnedat the time that these measures were not sufficient.

In response to the latest incident, Haringey Council has pointed out that it hasput in a bid to Transport for London for funding to introduce a 20-mph zonein Denton Road and surrounding roads. However, it is by no means assuredthat the bid will be successful, and even if it is, “investigations” willnot commence until the 2005-6 financial year.

Commenting on the latest incident and the Council’s response, Cllr LauraEdge said:

“Local residents were not satisfied with the measures taken by the Councilin January and this latest incident proves beyond a shadow of a doubt thatthese were wholly insufficient. This is a genuine accident blackspot andHaringey Council’s response is entirely inadequate.

“Urgent preventative measures are needed now, not in 2006 and subject to TfLapproval. Otherwise it is only a matter of time before someone is injured orkilled.”

INDEPENDENT REVIEW FINDS HOMOPHOBIA ACROSS EVERY DEPARTMENT OF COUNCIL

Liberal Democrats in Haringey have demanded action to tackle widespreadprejudice against lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered residents andcouncil staff. They are seeking implementation of all the recommendationsmade in an independent review of Haringey Council’s policies and practicestowards sexual minorities.

Liberal Democrat Spokesperson on LGBT issues, Councillor Ron Aitken,expressed concern at the full findings of a consultant’s report received inAugust, which he says has not been circulated widely enough to councillorsand staff.

The report was delivered to members of the Sexual EqualitiesReview body, on which Cllr Aitken sat and chaired several of the meetings,together with LGBT voluntary organisations in Haringey. Among the manyworrying findings in the report, Haringey staff expressed the view that theyhad no confidence in either reporting complaints of homophobic incidents orin how those complaints would be dealt with.

Cllr Ron Aitken comments:

“I was shocked at the high levels of homophobia found by the consultants intheir survey and the interviews they undertook with Haringey staff andresidents.

“The Council suffers from widespread and entrenched institutional homophobiaand this must be tackled as a top priority through a third party reportingscheme, such as that pioneered by the Metropolitan Police. We also needmeasures to root out bullying by homophobic managers and staff.”

Note:

Among the key findings of the consultant’s report were:

“The Council’s responses in practice, to identifying and meetings the needsof the LGBT might best be described as indifferent or ambivalent andreluctant”. (p8)

“Half of staff respondents had experienced some form of harassment withinthe workplace and where the harassment was directly related to theindividuals known or perceived sexual orientation”. (p7)

An attempt to interview all Lead Cabinet Members about LGBT issues had to beabandoned due to lack of response. (p19)

Residents expressed concerns that their confidentiality regarding sexualitymight be breached. (p35)

Residents expressed the view that the Council was not genuinely committed tosexual equality. (p34)

LIB DEMS PRESS HARINGEY TO LOOK AT £30m BILL FOR TEMPS

Haringey Council is to spend £30 million employing temporary staff over the nextfinancial year, according to official projections. The figure, revealed atyesterday’s meeting of the Borough’s scrutiny committee, prompted LiberalDemocrat councillors to call for an urgent inquiry into the Council’s use oftemporary staff and agency workers.

The watch-dog committee was examining spending proposals for the next threeyears as part of Haringey Council’s budget setting process. It was suggestedthat the cost of temporary workers had more than trebled from £8m in 2000 to£30m next year.

Lib Dem calls for urgent action were supported, and the committee will nowstart the process of taking a detailed look at the role of temps within theCouncil.

Commenting, Councillor Stephen Gilbert said:

“By any measure £30 million is a lot of money and we have to be clear that we are getting the best possiblevalue for local tax-payers. Temporary workers will have a role in anorganisation of Haringey’s size, but their services always come at a premiumwith agencies also taking a healthy commission.

“Permanent staff are more likely have a sense of identity and provideballast to an organisation and we must look closely at why we are so relianton temps. Is the recruitment process for permanent workers taking too longor are we failing to hold on to people when they have been recruited?”

LIB DEM DISMAY OVER DAMAGE TO OAK TREE IN TILE KILN LANE

Lib Dem councillors in Highgate are calling for an investigation into thefate of a precious oak tree located in a building site in Highgate, whichparty leader Neil Williams says may have been severely damaged as a resultof works carried out on it last week.

The controversy arose last Saturday morning when workers turned up at TileKiln Lane N6 and carried out a severe pruning which council officers admithas been very badly done and was in violation of specific instructionsgranted that allowed for only the modest pruning of the tree.

Cllr Williamsis dismayed at the development on the narrow site adjacent to Archway, wherehe opposed the granting of planing permission for the building of new homesearlier in the year.

While the lower limbs of the tree have been left, the tree has beenconsiderably stripped away towards the crown. Cllr Williams wants a fullinvestigation into how and why the excess pruning took place, and haswelcomed the fact that Haringey Council has indicated that it will be pursuing anenforcement order over the matter.

However, he would like all buildingworks on the site to be stopped until these issues have been fully resolved.

Neil Williams comments:

“I will be asking the planning department how thissituation came about. We have already lost one beautiful oak tree this yearfrom this sensitive site due to disease, and damage to the other oak treewould be a real blow.My fears over how the green oasis of Tile Kile Lanemight be damaged by development are being realised, and urgent action needsto be taken to protect what is left.”

FEATHERSTONE WELCOMES ACTION OVER MUSWELL HILL DUMPING BLACKSPOT

Lib Dem councillor Lynne Featherstone has welcomed action by HaringeyCouncil to ensure that litter / fly-tipping blackspots around the OdeonCinema and Athenaeum Mews, Muswell Hill are resolved. She has been pressingthe Council for action for several months.

The two areas have received public criticism in recent weeks, and HaringeyCouncil had previously washed its hands of the responsibility, citing theOdeon cinema and Sainsbury’s supermarket as responsible for the cleansing ofthese areas.

However, Haringey Council has now sent a warning letter to Sainsbury’s,pointing out the requirement under the Duty of Care Environmental ProtectionAct 1990, section 47 to provide suitable receptacles for the storage ofwaste and (section 34) to deal with waste escape from receptacles.

In response, Sainsbury’s has given an undertaking to clear all the piled uprefuse from the area. All neighbouring businesses have received lettersadvising them of their responsibility with regard to waste disposal.

A new legal notice, called a ‘Cleansing Notice’, is now available to HaringeyCouncil to impose on the other blackspot, the Odeon car park. Lib Demcouncillors have pressed for years for the area to be regularly cleared offly-tipped rubbish and litter, but in the past have been stonewalled by theCouncil who have said that it was not public property and they werepowerless.

The new notice would require the cinema to sweep and cleanse the land once aweek if there is no improvement in the area’s cleanliness. However on aninspection earlier this week council officers reported significantimprovements with litter and fly-tipped rubbish cleared by cinema staffregularly.

Cllr Featherstone comments:

“I am pleased that finally action is being taken to resolve these twoblackspots. However I am concerned that it has taken so much pressure fromresidents, councillors and the press to get Haringey Council to take seriousaction.

“Haringey Council must get its priorities right and respond to issues raisedby Haringey residents and their representatives, and not wait for a few badheadlines.”