Haringey Council results

Well – it was very close! Massive Lib Dem gains, but not quite enough to take control of Haringey Council – Labour majority cut to just three (30-27 – no other parties have any councillors) with Lib Dems making 11 gains.

We also topped the vote across the borough – adding up the top votes in each ward – and actually now have councillors in a majority of the wards in Haringey. So – very close! Best every Lib Dem result, including our first councillors in Tottenham, many in Wood Green etc.

Lib Dem highlights:

Alexandra – 3 Lib Dem holds – Dave Beacham, Wayne Hoban and Susan Oatway re-elected

Bounds Green – 2 Lib Dem gains – Ali Demirci and John Oakes

Crouch End – 3 Lib Dem holds – Ron Aitken and David Winskill re-elected, joined by Lyn Weber

Fortis Green – 3 Lib Dem holds – Matt Davies and Martin Newton re-elected, joined by Sara Beynon

Harringay – 2 Lib Dem gains – Karen Alexander and Carolyn Baker

Highgate – 3 Lib Dem holds – Bob Hare and Neil Williams re-elected, joined by Justin Portess

Hornsey – 3 Lib Dem gains – Robert Gorrie, Errol Reid and Monica Whyte elected

Muswell Hill – 3 Lib Dem holds – Jonathan Bloch and Gail Engert re-elected, joined by Sheila Rainger (who has taken over my old council seat)

Noel Park – 2 Lib Dem gains – Catherine Harris and Fiyaz Mughal elected

Stroud Green – 1 Lib Dem hold and 2 Lib Dem gains – Laura Edge re-elected and Ed Butcher and Richard Wilson elected

Congratulations and commiseration to all candidates and helpers – both those who made it and those who didn’t, in all parties.

UPDATE: There are now further election result details on Haringey Council’s website.

London's best residents' association

Off to the residents’ association for Tivoli, Montenotte and Glasslyn Roads. I turn up for the AGM itself so I can hear the discussion before my allotted speech and so get a better idea of their concerns. I arrive at 11am and am offered wine – this is good news – but I decline until after the meeting. I like a glass of wine – but they have asked me to speak for 40 minutes and take 20 minutes of questions – so wits and brain need to be intact!

They are clearly a top-notch residents’ association who are organised, active and hands on. Cllr Dave Winskill (Lib Dem, Crouch End) has been working closely with them over some time on issues around planning and anti-social behaviour. The roads are right next to Highgate Wood School which brings its challenges in the form of young people sometimes causing agro and damage. They, the school and other key partners meet and have had a fair bit of success. John, the guy who looks after the schools issue, makes a good point that when there is someone out in the street on a Friday night the kids don’t do the destructive stuff. One was heard saying ‘better not – there’s people about’. If only people were out and about more – it would deal with quite a lot of it as well as giving more confidence to others to go out.

Winskill arrives at midday and I tell him that his ears should have been burning from the very complimentary remarks several members have made about him and how helpful and active he is. Dave doesn’t blush – but tells me that they are the best residents’ association in London. So clearly mutual admiration!

I give quite a long speech, trying to interweave the local issues around Hornsey Town Hall, planning, anti-social behaviour and phone masts – together with the how they fit into the national picture. I also go into quite a lot of detail about the Government’s impending proposals for new legislation on terrorism and why we are supporting three of the proposals but not the other two.

The country wants and needs its political parties to try and work consensually at such times as these – and we are doing our best to do so. However, we mustn’t abdicate our responsibility to scrutinise proposed legislation in Parliament. It is very easy under the stress we are feeling to bring in draconian legislation which removes our freedoms in the name of protecting us from terrorists – and is a terribly difficult line to walk. But bad, rushed legislation does harm.

There are three proposals from the Government that we totally support. These are the ones to make it an offence to train to be a terrorist, carry out acts preparatory to terrorism and inciting terrorism.

However, we are not supporting the Government on two new proposals in their current form. The first – ‘glorification of terrorism ‘ – has far too broad a definition. Such looseness will mean a feast for lawyers interpreting what constitutes ‘glorification’. One man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter. I can understand where the Government is coming from on this. My blood boiled when I watched one of the suicide bombers broadcast video on Al Jazira praising the act. However, legislation has to be effective or it is worse than no legislation. A smart lawyer will run rings around this one.

The second proposal we have problems with is the one to allow three months detention without trial. This strikes at the heart of the British principles of justice that there is not detention without trial. We understand the need that the police have to get evidence which is not always obtainable within the 14-day period currently allowed, but allowing detention for three months without trial is basically internment.

I am hoping that the Government is genuine about consensus with us and therefore will be willing to discuss these two proposals. If they simply bowl along and say they are going to legislate on those two without trying to find a way through – then we will be forced to oppose.

We had a good discussion post my speech – and then I succumbed to a glass of wine.

David Warwick's departure

Commons all day with a variety of business to take care of – but leave at 4pm to go to the Chief Executive of Haringey’s leaving do at Ally Pally. Held in the Palm Court – it is thronging. The Palm Court is so named because it is a vast space akin to a greenhouse with huge plants and glass roof – so the greenhouse effect is present and we are all melting.

Speeches begin at 6pm with Charles Adje, Labour Leader of Haringey Council. He starts by saying he is going to read a letter from Peter Forrest (a former Tory councillor, who was leader of the opposition for a few years before the Liberal Democrats stared winning council seats in 1998). Now – given there are no Tories on the council and haven’t been for several years – it does make me wonder about the cosiness we often see between Labour and Tories in Haringey …!

However, it is clear to me from the three people lining up to speak – that Labour has forgotten to ask me or any Liberal Democrat to say a few words, despite the fact that the Chief Executive was the Chief Exec for all of Haringey Council – not just the Labour party.

I take matters into my own hands – and circling the back of the room – I make my way to the guy who is introducing the speakers and tell him that I would like to say a few words too. Of course, I haven’t prepared anything because I hadn’t been asked to speak originally. Labour are always trying to exclude me / us from everything – but this was quite shameful.

I am then faced with a dilemma. I am furious with Labour over their ‘sacking’ of the Chief Exec. Publicly – David Warwick is leaving because he has decided to take early retirement. Pigs might fly in my view. Out of the blue – with never a mention of such an idea – and leaving virtually immediately upon announcement – this looks like a sacking, smells like a sacking and walks like a sacking.

I suspect the Labour leadership could not bear the fact that this Chief Exec wasn’t a Labour hack and that he did not simply go along with everything they wanted however mad.

So – what do I do? Say what I really think or simply say nice things? Resort to humour is my get out. I keep it brief. I say that it was an extraordinarily fast retirement. I mention that I hope that the entire management board won’t follow as Haringey needs stability (they will go – one already on her way to Hammersmith and Fulham). And I am cheeky – which I won’t go into here!

I make a hasty exit with Cllr David Winskill – not in case of repercussions but because I am speaking at a local vigil at the Crouch End Clock Tower for the victims of the bomb blasts. I had been asked to speak at the one at Trafalgar Square – but because Haringey residents were so affected personally by the attacks as four of our tube stations are on the Piccadilly Line, it seemed far more important to be here.

About a hundred turn up – which considering shortness of time is a really good show. Inevitably – and rightly – in speeches Iraq and the Middle East creep into the frame. I concentrate on unity – believing absolutely that what all of us from every faith, creed and colour have in common is so much stronger than anything that divides us by our differences. It must be ‘us’ – and us is everyone – against them – deluded and fanatical extremists who murder with no true understanding.

However, I do believe that every action has a reaction – and we certainly received intelligence prior to the Iraq war that if we went to war – we would be likely to increase the chance of terrorist activity against us. The government clearly still felt it right to go to war – I didn’t. However, it is no excuse for terrorism. It is just a fact that it would increase. And festering sores of unresolved disputes will always be a source from which politicians can drink and then poison young men’s minds.

I have to leave the vigil at 7.30pm as I have promised to speak at the NO2ID cards meeting in Haringey. I literally turn up to speak and take questions before having to run onto a meeting with Hornsey Town Hall Trust who wanted to meet me post election.

They opt to take me to dinner to do so – which on a lovely evening is extremely pleasant. The two men are reasonable and I, as I repeatedly say, would love both sides of this stupid divide to work together. But I fear they are both going to stick to their absolute positions and that therefore despite my best efforts which I wish to employ will remain divided – which is a pity for the community.

One of the problems is that the Hornsey Town Hall Trust want the site first handed over to a trust, whilst the Council’s plan has more of a role for a developer earlier in the process. The reality is that I think it very unlikely the Council (whose property the site is, and so has both a financial and a moral a responsibility to ensure that whatever happens to the site doesn’t turn out to be a disaster) will be persuaded the risks of handing over the site just like that to a trust are really low enough to justify this course.

So – my ideal would be for Anthony Westbrook and Anthony Charnley from the Hornsey Town Hall Trust to go onto the Community Partnership Board – set up by the Council – as I think they have fantastically valuable skills which the Community Partnership lack – and put their efforts into that pot so that what comes out at the other end is nearer to the vision wanted by the community.

Seems easy, hey? But the Hornsey Trust folk – although they do say that they are happy to have any Trust (not necessarily theirs) in the seat – are not willing to give up their model. And so – I guess they won’t join the Community Trust.

Impasse – but I am still going to do my best to try and bring these two sides – who are both genuinely wanting roughly the same vision – together.

Leave restaurant about 11pm – and rush home to see by-election results. Way before results come through – I get texted from Cheadle to say we’ve won. Fab! That will put paid to the endless rumours and whispering about Charles Kennedy’s likely survival. He’s not going anywhere!

Hornsey Town Hall

Settle down to write LibDem Christmas cards. Rather nice this year with a picture of Queens Wood in the snow taken by one of the Highgate councillors. It’s difficult to get the balance right between personal touch and making sure everyone is included.

Then, meet up with three of my Lib Dem colleagues on Haringey Council (Neil Williams, Dave Winskill and Bob Hare) to talk to some of the key movers in the Hornsey Town Hall Trust.

They are cross with the recommendations of Haringey Council’s Advisory Panel. The key questions to me are how to we ensure that the community’s needs – not those of developers – are put first and how do we get all the local groups working together.

We are looking to see how we might be able to influence this process. I want to see if we can bridge the gap between the Hornsey Town Hall Trust / Crouch End for People and the other local groups.

One think I would want though from whoever runs the Trust is firm guarantees about the future of the building if everything goes wrong – it cannot be flogged off by anyone to get out of trouble.

Hornsey Town Hall

Will Haringey Council flog off Hornsey Town Hall and use the proceeds for their projects in the east of the borough? Or will the residents of Crouch End and Hornsey rise up and win the Town Hall for their dream facilities for a better community? The battle is on and I observed the latest meeting of Hornsey Town Hall advisory panel (set up under pressure by Haringey Council to advise on the future of the site) and thought you might like to know what was discussed.

We had a presentation from the ex-founding director of the charitable trust for Shoreditch Town Hall. A trust has been suggested by many people (including both Crouch End for People and the Liberal Democrat councillors on Haringey Council) as the best way forward for the site, so it was interesting to hear how a trust has operated in a similar situation elsewhere. The Shoreditch trust was founded after Hackney Council commissioned a report (with extensive community consultation) which recommended the creation of an arms-length, stand-alone trust for the site. So the trust was born and the site was handed over in stages – first for a 3-year lease, with an option for a further 99-years if the trust got going successfully. Importantly the lease was “non-assignable” – which meant the site couldn’t be passed on to anyone else (i.e. the site couldn’t fall into commercial hands), and if the trust failed it reverted to the council.

The possible parallels with Haringey are quite striking (yes, the Shoreditch site even had a car park! It is a 39,000 square foot listed building with two large halls). To give the trust a chance to get going, Hackney Council gave it money for the first three years equal to what it would have otherwise spent on the site – though the trust had to become self-sustaining in the long run. To help do this, some of the site was sold off, which generated the money to restore the rest of it. The opening is due in December.

Interestingly, the opening is in stages. There will be lots of community facilities for arts, performance etc. They have been innovative with the commercial ventures of hiring the hall for weddings, tea dances, artists in residence and local events. A lot of effort has been spent ensuring engagement with the local community so that everyone feels they have a stake. Staging the development of the site and their aspirations has let them grow with the project. One key point made was that the skills needs of Board of Trustees was paramount – and they actually conducted a skills audit and hired a recruitment agency in order to ensure they had what they needed on the board.

The general idea of a trust for the Hornsey Town Hall site was strongly supported at the meeting. There was a report tabled by commercial consultants, which outlined possible options for the site – basically assigning ball-park costs to ideas which had been discussed at earlier meetings of the panel. The range included a theatre, mini-plex cinema, piazza, bar restaurant, citizens’ advice, office space, health centre, skate board park, car park, residential use – in all or any combinations thereof. Clearly one of the main issues to address will be whether to sell off (or otherwise use commercially) parts of the site to help generate money for developing the rest of it for the community.

Personally, in an ideal world I would rather see the site developed without having to do this – but realistically I am sceptical that the money will be available to make the best use of the site for the community unless some money is raised from commercial sources. One possibility might be to generate rental income from some of the old council office space, which my colleague Dave Winskill (Crouch End councillor) has been pressing to get properly examined. The figures on this will need to be examined closely! And any money raised must go back into the site rather than being siphoned off by Haringey Council for elsewhere.

Discussion around the car park centred on ensuring that some parking was available to support the site, for disabled parking and for servicing the projects. There was also a call to ensure that transport policies should begin to be focused upon ideas such as – if you bought a theatre ticket the ticket would also enable you to take the bus to the site. Transport capacity on local buses serving the site would need increasing.