HIGHGATE TUBE CONTROL CENTRE – FEATHERSTONE AND HARE PUSH FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT

Lib Dem councillors Lynne Featherstone and Bob Hare have stepped up their calls for a full environmental impact assessment of the controversial new Tube Control Centre project in Highgate. The move comes following a letter to local residents from the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, suggesting such an assessment is necessary – despite Haringey Council having accepted Tubelines’ suggestion that this was not needed.

Cllrs Bob Hare (Highgate) and Lynne Featherstone (Muswell Hill) say this latest development shows Tubelines must conduct an impact study on the scheme – and Haringey Council should insist that the company does so.Lib Dems say that an impact assessment will ensure that measures are taken to help protect nearby habitats as well as local people. Local bat populations for example, and the willow warblers which inhabit the woodland edge could be affected by the scheme.

Bob Hare comments:

“I have argued all along that an environmental impact assessment is necessary for such a sensitive site on the edge of Highgate Wood. Local people living nearby, and indeed the wider Highgate community, are entitled to know that the impact of such a major building is being fully assessed.

“It is time Tubelines bowed to this pressure and agreed to a full study.”

STROUD GREEN – EDGE CALLS FOR END TO SQUATTING MISERY

A Liberal Democrat councillor has expressed dismay at the reoccupation of numbers 15 and 17 Perth Road, Stroud Green by squatters.Laura Edge, who represents Stroud Green, says it is the third time in less than a year that the properties, which were managed by Haringey Council’s Temporary Accommodation Team, have been squatted.

Squatters first moved in immediately after the properties were emptied in June 2004. Following legal proceedings they were evicted and the properties secured, but new squatters were nevertheless able to get in. In October 2004 a further eviction notice was served and the properties were again secured.

At this time the Council informed local councillors and residents that the properties would be sold at auction but the sale was put on hold while the Housing Department looked at alternative uses for the properties. Before a solution was found, squatters again gained entry on Friday 4 February 2005.

The Council will now have to initiate legal proceedings against the squatters once again, a process which could take up to eight weeks. Officers have assured Cllr Edge that a definitive decision will be made on the future of the properties before the squatters are evicted to put an end to the cycle of misery for local residents.

Residents in Perth Road are furious that the Council has taken so long to decide on the future of the properties, which continue to deteriorate, while in the meantime allowing their lives to be blighted by squatters, who residents say have frequently held large and noisy parties into the early hours.

Commenting Cllr Edge said:

“I support Haringey Council’s desire to retain social housing stock wherever possible.

“However, in failing to decide on the future of these properties Haringey has caused untold misery to residents in Perth Road, not to mention the cost involved in the ongoing deterioration of the building and in constantly re-securing it. It is therefore imperative that the Council ensures that the mechanisms are in place to effect the sale as soon as this latest group of squatters are evicted.”

LIB DEMS CALL FOR END TO FLY-TIPPING EYESORE

Lib Dem Environment spokesperson Bob Hare has called on Haringey Council to remove fly-tipped junk from a garden in Alexandra Park Road that has remained there for nine months. The junk includes a trolley and armchair which have been sitting in the front garden of a small block of flats at 349 Alexandra Park Road.

Despite nine months of pressure from the Palace Neighbourhood Watch, the Council has taken no action. A representative from the Group contacted Cllr Hare earlier this week and requested his help in resolving the problem.

On the visit by Cllr Hare on Thursday (10th February), the representative confirmed that the Council did visit the site some time ago and assured the representative that they would be passing the information onto the Council’s waste contractors, Haringey Accord, to remove it. However, nothing happened and the group is still waiting, unable to get hold of anyone in charge.

Cllr Hare has contacted the Council and asked them to take urgent action to remove the waste. He is deeply concerned that after nine months of calling and writing, residents have been unable to get the rubbish removed.

Cllr Hare comments:

“This is completely unacceptable and I have asked the Council to deal effectively with the owners of the property who have permitted this unsightly accumulation of household waste to build up.

“I will also be pressing the Council to find out what action it will be taking against its contractor, Accord, over its failure to carry out the duties that residents pay such high Council Tax for.”

MORE POLICE NOW, SAYS LIB DEM LYNNE

Local Lib Dems have taken their campaign for 10,000 more police to Wood Green. Lynne Featherstone, their party’s Parliamentary spokesperson for the area, says that by putting a halt toLabour’s controversial ID card scheme, enough money would be saved to fund 10,000 more police officers across the country.

Ms Featherstone, who also sits on the Metropolitan Police Authority, says that more officers are sorely needed in Haringey. This is reflected in the long wait to extend new schemes such as ‘Safer Neighbourhoods’ to some parts of the borough, and the lack of manpower for manning other police facilities such as the new police kiosk in Wood Green.

Cllr Lynne Featherstone comments:

“There is no doubt that the money being wasted on Labour’s ID card scheme could be put to good use, with more police on the beat on the streets of Haringey.

“We also have to cut the amount of paperwork being carried out by officers, as many police officers spend twice as much time on this as they do on real policing, out on the streets.”

LIB DEMS CARRY OUT MAJOR ANNUAL SURVEY

Haringey residents will be able to voice their opinions and concerns on a variety of local issues,from council services to the NHS,thanks to the launch of the Liberal Democrat annual residents’ survey. The Liberal Democrats say the survey is being sent to nearly 50,000 homes in Hornsey and Wood Green over the next few weeks.

Cllr. Neil Williams, Leader of the Liberal Democrat Group, explains the importance of the survey:

“It’s vital that local people can share their views, opinions and concerns about local and national issues with our Parliamentary spokesperson Lynne Featherstone and the local team of Lib Dem councillors.

“Turnout in elections has been falling for many years now, and one reason for this is that people do not feel that they are a part of the political process.

“We are committed to working with local residents and dealing with the issues they raise, not just at election time but all year round. I am confident that this survey will have the biggest response ever.”

Long campaigning weekend

Started on Thursday with a mad dash around Muswell Hill, Highgate and Hornsey taking clerical work to a raft of new helpers. Next day out again, this time with both clerical work and our latest leaflet to get to helpers. Bit of variety on Saturday – more deliveries of leaflets to our helpers but this time rounded off by a couple of hours folding and stuffing letters in front of the TV for evening entertainment.

Finally, today – wrote my next newspaper column, this blog, thank you letters, paperwork, emails and for a special treat – I am just off out with the last of the batches to get to our helpers.

More parking evidence

Transport Committee at the London Assembly – and the Association of London Government (ALG), the Leader of Islington Council, Pulp Faction and the Parking Adjudicator are all coming before me to give evidence to the Parking Enforcement scrutiny.

One of the ALG reps made it quite clear that in his view London should put up or shut up. Clearly sick of the continued innuendo from punters and papers alike that there was any question of parking controls and enforcement being about revenue raising rather than traffic and parking resolution he informed the committee that, if councils were impugned in this way, legal action could follow.

So that’s that then!

Actually, the more interesting part of the scrutiny was to do with the real heart of trying to improve the system – dealing with the confusion between signs, between boroughs and within boroughs. Why should a person paying for a pay and display ticket but accidentally buying it from the wrong machine end up with a fine? Could there be any harmonisation? Was there disproportionality between offences? Should you end up with a £100 fine for a few minutes over on a meter – and should that fine be the same as if you parked illegally on a double yellow line or in a bus lane?

We have had an overwhelming response to this scrutiny. And not as was inferred mainly from people just ‘chancing it’ or trying to get off – mostly sane, well-balanced letters with constructive suggestions as to how to improve this situation in London.

Anyway – this all now has to be analysed – and put into an Assembly report with recommendations to whomever we think appropriate.

On patrol with a Parking Attendant

Off to Lewisham to accompany a Parking Attendant on his rounds. This is happening because Bob McNaughton – the Chief Exec of NCP – when he came before the first session of my Parking Enforcement Scrutiny suddenly said, “Why don’t you come and go out with a PA?” And I said “Done.”

First we had a tour of their very cramped offices and then we had a sit-down chat with the outgoing and incoming managers. It was a riveting discussion about some of the nitty gritty sent to us in evidence by unhappy Londoners. Too much to go into here – but centred on the ‘unfair’ tickets and practises. More of that later.

Then I went around for an hour or so with Michael – who has to be one of the nicest and most professional Parking Attendants in the world (well you wouldn’t expect NCP to send me out with anyone who might not present the right image). And he was so good. However, in a very short space of time we had discovered a whole raft of ‘normal’ complaints from the public.

We look at one car with a ticket and he informs me it should never have been
issued as there is an exemption badge hanging from the mirror which signals a doctor or midwife on emergency call. Michael calls up the attendant who issued it and instructs him to remove it and do the necessary paperwork back at the office. Would this have been removed if I and my two scrutiny officers had not been present? Who knows. But if not, the doctor would have had the bother and effort of writing in and so on to get it cancelled.

Then we pass a car with two wheels just an inch on the pavement. Michael informs me that he would not issue a ticket for this as there is no obstruction being caused – and that is the criterion for issuing a ticket on wheels up. I doubt whether that is the case in all boroughs – or whether all parking attendants are so balanced. We certainly have evidence from other boroughs where wheels up – you are done – obstruction or not.

Next we find a street where one side is residents only and the other is pay and display. Both lots are confused and park in each other’s parking spaces – thereby lots of tickets could be issued. They were not on this occasion and my parking attendant friend was very helpful and advised people of their error and suggested they move or they would get a ticket.

He was a role model of perfection. This was a good example of the confusion many people experience thanks to unclear signs – and indeed the confusing design of this scheme.

We then pass an unmarked police car. On the dashboard is a book showing it is actually a police car. Michael informs me that they never touch police cars. And yet, the previous week someone had gone out with Westminster Parking Attendants and they had booked five police cars during the time he was patrolling with them.

Different rules for different boroughs!

And so on. It was an interesting morning and I thank NCP for inviting me to patrol with an attendant.

The other side of the coin was the very real danger and aggression attendants face. Michael himself had had a ‘code red’ which means a physical assault.

In fact, one other thing that happened on my travels was when Michael asked a driver to move on. The driver was displaying a disabled badge and was waiting on a double yellow line for a disabled resident to come back to the car. Michael said he was not allowed to wait even with a disabled badge. The bloke said he had just two minutes ago asked another attendant who had said it was all right. Very quickly, and despite Michael’s calm tone, the driver became aggressive, saying first a warden says one thing then you tell me another…

No one seemed ultimately to know for sure whether it was or was not actually permitted.

Congestion charge increase?

Fun time at City Hall. Mayor Livingstone was in front of me giving evidence to the Transport Committee (which I chair) yesterday on his desire to raise the Congestion Charge by over half to £8.

This is the same Mayor who four years ago when he came before me on the first of my investigations into the Congestion Charge told London that it was necessary to reduce traffic by 15% in the central zone – this was the critical level at which London would work – for business, for residents, for buses and all.

And nothing has changed. The charge works fantastically well – and there is no sign of a creep back or rise in traffic in the central zone.

Now, his main argument for an increase in the charge was that he wanted to drive traffic down further – by between 17% and 21% and that an £8 charge would do it. This was blown out of the water today as buried in the Transport for London Board papers was the fact that traffic in the central charging zone is already at a 21% reduction.

So why increase the charge?

Ken’s arguments jiggle about. It’s either about reducing traffic further for business OR it’s about quality of life and reducing pollution OR it’s about reassuring credit agencies that he is macho enough to raise money when needed for his borrowing OR it is to stop traffic creep back and so on…

It looks to me more like a simple cash grab.

LIB DEMS SLAM 38% RISE IN COUNCIL TAX

The Liberal Democrats have criticised Labour after Haringey Labour voted for a fourth successive year of inflation-busting increases in Council Tax.

Haringey’s Council Tax bills will increase 5% this year. The Government’s preferred measure of inflation, the Consumer Price Index, puts inflation at around 1.6% – only a third of Labour Haringey’s Council Tax increase.

At the last local elections in 2002, the Labour party told Haringey residents that the “days of large increases in Council Tax are over”. Despite this election promise, the tax on an average Band D home in the borough has risen by 37.7%.

Commenting on the budget debate, Lib Dem Finance spokesperson, Cllr Stephen Gilbert (Fortis Green), said:

“A rise of this level is totally unacceptable. At the heart of this is a very simple question: we are paying 38% more, but have services improved? I think most people would give a simple answer: no.

“It’s clear that Labour can’t be trusted on tax, and is unable or unwilling to deliver value-for-money services. We need a complete review of how Haringey spends taxpayers’ money, particularly looking at the cost of consultants and temporary staff.

“Only a complete rethink, with a local income tax, would give residents an equitable and stable system with manageable levels of local taxation.”

Note:

For more about the Lib Dem alternative to Council Tax – replacing it with a tax based on ability to pay – see www.axethetax.org.uk