MUSWELL HILL – NEW BUS STOP FOR LOCAL ROUTE

Residents of Alexandra Park Road are to have a bus stop moved after the capital’s transport bosses agreed with residents and local Lib Dems that the gap between the first and second stops going downhill are too close, leaving a long gap before the third stop at the bottom.

On routes 102 and 299, the bus stop near the junction with Muswell Road is to be moved 162 metres to outside Alexandra Parish Church. It is also likely that a new shelter will be installed.

Parliamentary Spokesperson and GLA member Lynne Featherstone comments:

“Hopefully, it will not be too long before London Buses install the new bus stop, which should shorten the walks for many pedestrians using the service.”

Local councillor Susan Oatway (Lib Dem, Alexandra ward) adds:

“This is good news, as all measures that encourage people to take the bus are to be welcomed and I am pleased London Buses has responded to this request.”

CALLS TO BE HEEDED OVER N10 DUMPING

Cllr Lynne Featherstone has called for urgent action to be taken to resolve the fly-tipping problem at the former Lynx Depot in Coppetts Road, N10. The Muswell Hill councillor’s calls come following reports from residents that the dumped rubbish has become so bad that it had even started encroaching on to the busy road and causing a hazard.

The depot has been a fly-tipping blackspot in the west of the borough since it closed last year and the Lib Dems have previously urged Haringey Council to take action over this issue with little progress made.

However in response to Ms Featherstone’s request, Haringey has confirmed that its waste management contractor Haringey Accord is going to clear the site. They also added that a CCTV camera would be installed on the site soon as Coppetts Road has now been outlined for targeting in the initial phase of the CCTV at dumping sites initiative.

Cllr Lynne Featherstone comments:

“Both my Fortis Green colleagues and I are pleased with this news and I’m hopeful that this will alleviate the problem. However, Haringey should heed calls to scrap its bulky rubbish collection charges, which are contributing to so many fly-tipping problems across the borough.”

SCHOOL PLACES PROBLEM MUST BE ADDRESSED

Liberal Democrat councillors are calling on Haringey’s education authority to urgently address the issue of primary school places in the Muswell Hill area as they continue to try to uncover the extent of the problem in the west of the borough.

Harnigey Council has now confirmed to the Lib Dems that 35 children in the area failed to get their first, second or third choices for primary school for this September – the equivalent of more than one reception class.

The problem came to a head last week at a meeting with aggrieved parents and local councillors. Liberal Democrat and Muswell Hill Councillor Lynne Featherstone is concerned that Haringey Council and LEA have failed to prepare themselves adequately for the baby boom of 2000. The result is that many residents living in the wards that make up the Muswell Hill area will have to drive their children to and from schools outside the immediate area, such as Bounds Green.

The Lib Dems are now calling for Haringey Council to take urgent action to relieve the situation.

Cllr Featherstone comments:

“The west of the borough has had a problem for many years with a shortage of school places. It has not been addressed and no plans were made in advance to cater for the baby boom we saw in 2000. Haringey Council has only just started to address the problem that means that serious improvements are at least three years away.

“This is totally unacceptable and we are insisting that a temporary classroom is provided at one of the local schools as a stop gap, so parents and children can be accommodated whilst Haringey sorts out the mess they have got themselves into, because of a lack of forward planning.”

Muswell Hill Councillor Gail Engert shares her colleagues concerns. She fears that the current situation could be exacerbated by new housing developments, increasing the number of family homes in the area. Although acknowledging the need for more homes in London she is concerned that Haringey is not matching the increase in homes with an increase in school places.

Cllr Engert comments:

“Haringey’s lack of foresight is likely to compound this already desperate situation. Demand for housing is huge in this area, however it must be matched by extra provision of services, and this includes increasing the number of school places.”

Boxing night

Haringey Police and Community Boxing Club Charity Evening – a black tie dinner and boxing match. This is a club started by ex-Haringey Police Commander Stephen James which helps kids box – with the intention in part that it thereby also helps keep them out of trouble.

I arrive at the venue and am put in a little ante-room for the top table with others. Stephen James is there, as are the current top-cop in Haringey Stephen Bloomfield, Council Chief Executive David Warwick, Cllr Peacock (Labour), soon to be ex-leader George Meehan, David Lammy MP and Pastor Nims from Haringey Peace Alliance.

So a good crew. Stephen James introduced me as the next MP for Hornsey & Wood Green – which went down well as you can imagine with the Labour members there! I though Sheila Peacock might thump him.

Then we were announced one by one to go into the hall and to the table. The boxing ring itself is directly in front of the top table with other tables filling the hall to the right and the left. The dinner is served, there is an auction of various items to raise money and then the boxing itself.

I know it is probably not politically correct to enjoy boxing – but I thought it was fantastic. There is a basic instinct – a primeval pull – when two men (boys) fight each other – and boy did they fight. The last bout included Michael Grant who is one of the real successes of the boxing club. A black youngster from Tottenham who is now No 2 in England. It was a great fight and I take my hat off to Stephen James for what he has done.

Falling out of love with Ken

Take scrutiny officers that have served the Transport Committee to pub for a thank you drink after the last meeting of the Transport Committee in the first term of London government. I felt rather sentimental after four years of absolute pleasure in my brief – and felt even more sentimental after a couple of gin and tonics.

Sadly, I had to go back to work to finish of the speech I had been writing for Thursday evening’s London Region Lib Dem Rally.

At the rally, Charles Kennedy, Simon Hughes, Sarah Ludford (MEP) and I are primed to rally our troops and kick off our London campaign.

So we did. Charles was in excellent form. Spoke for 20 minutes without notes, stirring stuff! And he seemed fit and well – which I was as relieved about as everyone else.

Simon gave us his vision for London (more of which will follow over the coming weeks of the election – and will be launched to the media on Monday), then Sarah and then me.

If I say so myself, it was one of my better speeches. I had an unashamed attack on my ex-best friend Mayor Livingstone. I will publish the speech on the web next week. But made the serious points through humour – and there are lots of not very funny things about Ken which after four years working with him I can see explain very well why he was treated like the devil incarnate by the Labour Party last time out.

Arrive late, leave early

We start Assembly Transport Committee at 9.30am to take an update from Peter Hendy on bendy buses and their recent tendency to burst into flame. The early start was at his request and, as chair, I try and accommodate peoples’ timetables. He is a busy man.

However, on arriving in Committee Room 5, I am given the news that he is going to be late. Something to do with a train problem (him on it and stuck). So I decide to start with the road hump report as soon as we are quorate. I ask officers to round up members and am told that Jenny Jones is eating her breakfast and a couple of others are on their way. Members are really poor at time keeping!

The hump report has received lots of publicity – very controversial. The car-lobby appear to think it is pro-hump and the pro-hump lobby appear to think it’s pro-car. So I think it is the perfectly balanced rational report with sensible recommendations – which it is.

The Tories decide not to sign up because it is pro-hump. Everyone else says they will support it.

Anyway, Jenny Jones had flounced in late into this debate and immediately had a go at me for starting the hump bit early. How dare I start without her when she wanted to be there for that debate in particular? Given I was told she was eating her breakfast outside when the meeting started, I thought her behaviour was appalling. Prima donna of the first order. If Peter Hendy was delayed, it’s perfectly reasonable for me to get the committee’s agreement to move on to the next item of business.

The rest of the committee got on with our work – people had their say and the committee then voted through the report. I hope this will be the first of an ongoing series of work on road safety.

There’s was more for the committee to discuss after the hump report, but Jenny Jones then left early!

QUEENS LODGE: LABOUR CHANGE RULES TO BLOCK CALLS FOR AN INQUIRY

Liberal Democrat councillors will be demanding a special Full Council meeting if a motion calling for an inquiry into the Queen’s Lodge fiasco is not debated at Haringey Council’s Monday night meeting.

Last month shocked residents watched Labour “talk out” a Liberal Democrat motion that called for an independent enquiry into the controversial collapse of the building. Following the Labour filibuster, Lib Dem councillors re-submitted the motion for the Full Council meeting this coming Monday. But yesterday it was revealed that it has been placed last on the agenda, and so it is unlikely to be reached again.

Lib Dems says that the ruling Labour group have broken an agreement that existed between the two parties since before Christmas to ‘rotate’ motions (ensuring that each party had the chance of getting one of its proposals debated at least every other meeting).

Commenting, Liberal Democrat ward Councillor Stephen Gilbert said:

“Haringey Labour has now tried to stop calls for an inquiry into the collapse of the former Queen’s Lodge for the second month in a row. In doing so they are showing their contempt for local people’s concern and for keeping their agreement to ensure fair play in the Council.

“Residents are already beginning to believe that the Council has something to hide, and the extraordinary efforts that Labour are making to avoid debating this issue is only adding fuel to that speculation.

“Only an independent inquiry into what happened at Queen’s Lodge will address local people’s concerns Should Labour prevent a debate again on Monday, my colleagues and I will be calling a Special Full Council to raise the issue.”

Falling out of love with Ken

“I could have kissed Ken last night!”

That was how I began my first newspaper column almost four years ago when he delivered his first big speech at the Lord Mayor’s dinner for the new Greater London Authority. He had made a great speech – a brave speech – arguing that Britain must join the Euro or suffer the consequences.

But that was way back when he stood up for London’s interests against all comers – including Tony Blair.

I guess, like lots of other Liberal Democrats, I was a bit enamoured of the Mayor – a bit seduced by his wit, humour, directness and anti-establishment stance. I’d have preferred Susan Kramer – our 2000 candidate – to be in City Hall, but Ken didn’t appear to be a bad second choice.

I couldn’t understand why everyone who had worked with Ken did not have a good word to say about him. I couldn’t understand why the Labour Party treated him like the devil incarnate – particularly as it lost them the last Mayoral election and left their own mayoral candidate stranded in the obscure political wastelands. Poor old Frank Dobson – Frank who?

I had always thought Ken was a bit of lad, a champion of the people – a working class hero!

But I was so wrong. Four years on I am sadder but wiser.

Need and pragmatism has drawn sworn enemies into the same camp. Now Ken is Blair’s Mayor – and four years on from the birth of London Government he dances quite clearly to Labour’s tune.

What a shame!

I stood shoulder to shoulder with Mayor Livingstone in the fight against PPP on the tube and shoulder to shoulder in the fight for congestion charging.

His early vitriol towards the Government for condemning London to the appalling PPP on the tube and his attacks on Labour for providing London with too little money have petered out entirely.

Livingstone now stands for Labour not for London. Labour has in the past claimed to listen to London – now they follow a Mayor who when asked said the only views he was ever interested in were when people voted.

But credit where it is due. He has had some success – congestion charging (our policy), bus improvements – although he has no means to pay for the ever widening gap between revenue and rising bus costs. Budgeting is not his strong point – understatement. There are also more police on our streets – which we, London, are paying for.

Indeed, Livingstone has doubled the amount of money he takes from our Council Tax bills in just four years.

Just imagine what most councils could provide in improved services if they could get away with doubling their Council Tax! So yes, he’s achieved some things – but at what a cost. Where is the scale of improvements to justify the enormous increase in tax?

Think how little he has really done across London, particularly in the huge swathes of London where the Mayor’s sun don’t shine – like outside of zone one, for the millions he has extracted from us and spent – on his pet projects, pet areas and his own publicity machine. He now has even more spin doctors in City Hall than the Prime Minister has at Number 10.

He is no longer cuddly Ken, cheeky chappy. He’s signed up to New Labour, warts and all. He now wants us to vote for the party that rushed into war in Iraq at George Bush’s request, for the party that spent £500 million on privatising the tube – rather than improving services, and for the party that is ploughing ahead with top-up fees and foundation hospitals.

Perhaps that’s why he still feels the need to drop his trousers in public with politically incorrect outbursts from time to time – to show the old Ken hasn’t died. Labour now has to tolerate his ill-judged remarks like the recent ones about stringing up the Saudi royal family from lamp-posts.

So – he’s off my list now. I’m his ex-best friend and I would rather kiss a newt than Ken (although there is a distinct similarity between those two)!

I really thought we would see a new form of politics with the Assembly working to hold the Mayor to account – but so often the old pull of adversarial politics has sent Labour and Tory scuttling to their political corners – with the Mayor getting away with waste and incompetence.

But we can put that right in June!

Haringey Heartlands

I attend a report back on the Haringey Heartlands regeneration project consultation at Haringey Civic Centre. This was chaired by Cllr Makanji. And boy was cross. Whenever the residents said anything he didn’t like (which was often) he would shout and browbeat them into submission – threatening to close the meeting rather than let them speak.

There is a real battle to be fought to stop residents suffering at the hands of the Mayor, Council and LDA who seem intent on going ahead with a poorly designed scheme which will not deliver the jobs, infrastructure or homes needed.

Perhaps Richard Rogers, who is involved, can steer this right – trouble is, he appears to be advising the developers. Is that a conflict of interest? Must find out!

Terrorism

Secret meeting of the London Assembly to hear from London Resilience and other key partners how London would be handled in the event of catastrophic terrorist attack.

As it was under the confidential restrictions of the Government Information whatsit – I cannot divulge what was said. Only to say, I don’t think there was anything in the briefing that couldn’t have been stated at a public meeting. I don’t like confidential meetings – in fact that is the first one I think I have been to. If there is important information present you can’t out it in the public interest – and if there isn’t, what was the point of it being held in private?

My own thrust, for what it is worth, is an interest in public information – of which there seems little available. I am reassured that everything is in hand!