Uploaded my latest local column to the website today – it’s about the good news on policing in Highgate.
You can sign up to get my columns by email by dropping a message to lynnecolumn-subscribe AT lists.libdems.org.uk
Uploaded my latest local column to the website today – it’s about the good news on policing in Highgate.
You can sign up to get my columns by email by dropping a message to lynnecolumn-subscribe AT lists.libdems.org.uk
Local campaigners and local Lib Dem councillors have been vindicated today, as Haringey Council has now ruled invalid the hugely controversial planning decision on the backlands site at Cecile Park, Crouch End. The July decision by the Planning Committee caused outrage among local residents, and resulted in an appeal by local MP Lynne Featherstone and Lib Dem councillors to have the decision scrapped.
Lib Dems and local residents had accused Labour of outrageous shenanigans over the chairing of the Planning Committee, and flagrantly disregarding the Council’s constitution.
The Labour Chair, Cllr. Peacock was forced to step out of the meeting because of a declared personal and possible prejudicial interest with the developers. The Deputy Chair was absent for the same reason. In what is supposed to be a politically neutral body, the Labour chair of the committee Cllr. Sheila Peacock on leaving the meeting simply ‘ordained’ another Labour councillor as chair rather than letting the committee decide for itself as set out in Haringey Council’s constitution.Lynne Featherstone MP and Lib Dem councillors wrote to Haringey Council, urging it to suspend the issuing of permission certificates, rule the decision “non-determined” and allow an already scheduled Planning Appeal into two previous refusals to determine this application.
Local MP Lynne Featherstone comments:
“We have been vindicated entirely in our claims that the decision was made improperly. Haringey’s Planning Committee has been exposed to ridicule over the way it conducts its business, potentially exposing the council to enormous costs. Labour’s disregard for the rules has been simply shocking as they try to push this terrible development through.”
Lib Dem councillor for Crouch End, David Winskill, adds:
“Thankfully this development has been stopped for now, but we believe that the decision should now be being made by an external planning inspector through the appeal process. It is clear that the planning process has been brought into disrepute here, and when the application comes back to the committee on 11th September, the Committee must be scrupulous in demonstrating to residents that they will listen to their arguments and take them into account. “
To add to the nightmare of the mounds of rotting rubbish caused by Labour-run Haringey Council’s lack of contingency plan for rubbish collection during the recent strike, Muswell Hill residents have had their problems worsened by missing rubbish bins.
Lib Dem councillor Gail Engert spotted two missing bins whilst walking down Muswell Hill Broadway in her ward.
The first, outside a newsagent on the Broadway, has entirely disappeared, leaving just the open base which has become a magnet for discarded cans and wrappers. The second is next to a bus stop and has been set fire to. The bin has entirely melted and although the metal insert still provides a litter-disposal facility, the bin is extremely unsightly and a trip hazard.
Cllr Engert comments:
“I have written to Haringey Council explaining that they need to replace the bins as soon as possible. We already have a rubbish crisis and the missing bins in popular locations will only add to this. Not only are they eyesores in their current state, but they are health and safety hazards too, and need to be dealt with quickly.”
Haringey’s residents breathed a sigh of relief this morning as Haringey Accord’s refuse collectors ended their strike and returned to work. Workers voted to accept an offer made this morning, though it became clear quickly that the rubbish was likely to remain on the borough’s streets for some weeks to come.
Lib Dem councillors have been furious that no plans were in place to reduce the build up of rubbish. Labour-led Haringey Council have known that the dispute was very likely to take place since May, yet no contingency plans were put into place.
Brian Haley, the Labour councillor in charge of waste collection in the borough, explained that crews would be collecting rubbish from streets on normal collection days, and that there was now “three weeks worth of rubbish to clear”.
Commenting on the end of the refuse strike, Lib Dem Leader Neil Williams comments:
“This will come as an enormous relief to residents, but questions remain as to how well prepared Haringey was for this dispute, given the very long lead in time. We will be pressing to ensure that a proper contingency plan is put in place by the council to ensure that residents do not have to suffer this sort of misery again.”
Lynne Featherstone, MP for Hornsey and Wood Green, adds:
“The sickly smell of rotting rubbish is something that residents have been forced to get used to over the past weeks. I am frankly amazed that our Labour council, who have known that there would be industrial action since May, put no contingency plans in place to prevent this. Ensuring that rubbish is collected from our streets is one of the most basic and important responsibilities of a council, and we must ensure that Labour understand that they cannot pass the buck. They must ensure that this does not happen again.”
Sometimes if you keep pushing at a door – eventually it opens! At my recent meeting with our local Haringey Police Commander, Chief Superintendent Simon O’Brien, I asked him if we could have the new Highgate Safer Neighbourhood Team actually based in Highgate. After all, that’s what local people tell me they want. Police working and stationed in the area they patrol – rather than being based far away and travelling to the area as and when. And the good news is that he has agreed – subject to finding appropriate premises and the Metropolitan Police Estates Department agreeing. So we’re not home and dry yet!
I will be asking the Highgate ward councillors (my Lib Dem colleagues Neil Williams, Justin Portess and Bob Hare) to keep a look out for appropriate premises. In fact – if anyone reading this knows of somewhere suitable, let me know. I think it probably should be on a main thoroughfare – so that it is right bang where people walk past and not off the beaten track. I am going to go out with local officers in the autumn to walk the streets together to look for possible sites. It may not come off – there are a lot of people who still have to agree it – but best foot forward I say!
For years – ever since the old Highgate Police Station closed – local people have been asking for it to be re-opened. Unfortunately, this is not going to be the new home for the team. Highgate Police Station long ago ceased to be a working police station and for years now has housed other organisations (and once a building is no longer used by the police it is much, much harder to get it back).
It’s a shame in a way though that the old building won’t be put back into police use. I remember as a little girl being lost and going (or being taken I can’t remember) to the police station where a very nice policeman rang my mother. He said: ‘Mrs Ryness, I think I have your little girl here’. Sooooo Dixon of Dock Green and very kind!
This good news has come about because of the introduction of Safer Neighbourhood Teams coinciding with the need to modernise the police estate. It has finally been recognised that local policing is what people want – to make them feel safer and to be safer. At the same time – the old Victorian Police stations are no longer ‘fit for purpose’ to use the currently popular vernacular. So the idea of stationing local teams in the local area is an idea whose time has come! Way to go

So – my first year (and a bit) as MP for Hornsey & Wood Green has come to an end. My conclusions thus far are that there aren’t enough hours in the day, days in the week or weeks in the year – and cloning humans would be helpful!
It also has to be one of the best jobs in the world. It is the sheer scope of what has to be dealt with over any week that keeps the interest at boiling point. Being thrown in the deep end in terms of front bench Home Affairs spokesperson for Police, Crime and Disorder (and a list of other responsibilities) was a baptism of fire – but the only way to learn. Over the year I have written a diary of many of the things that I have done or thought on the day – but with the summer break just thought I would like to try and summarise and collect some of my activities, thoughts and impressions over this first year.
At the constituency end, a lot of the work is about taking up individual casework, trying to help and campaigning with local people to improve things – which is pretty much what I have been doing since before I was first elected to Haringey Council. (And it is interesting to see how the political culture in Haringey has changed since then. When my colleagues and I first seriously got stuck into local campaigning, the other parties were very snooty about delivering leaflets, issuing press releases, doing loads of individual casework, having a freepost address, and on and on. Of course, over the years as they lost elections and we won them they have bit by bit copied all the things they used to so look down on. Though it hasn’t helped them much!).
So the constituency end of being an MP was somewhat familiar to me – although the intensity and severity of the issues that people bring to surgery in particular has been an eye opener.
At this point I should perhaps explain what “surgery” means – as one person did write to me (in all seriousness) wondering what sort of doctor I was and what I did with all my surgeries. It made me smile … but the serious point of course is that the political class has a whole set of insider vocabulary – and it is very easy to over-estimate how much of the jargon (House, floor of the House, surgery, chamber, PMQs, EDM, etc etc) the rest of the world understands. So – for the uninitiated – my “surgery” is when constituents come and see my and raise any sort of issue they want. I guess the name comes from doctors – as when GPs hold surgeries people turn up with any manner of complaint.
Anyway – my surgery has taught me so much about the real impact of the things we debate in Parliament. I could have told you that the Home Office wasn’t coping within my first month as an MP. The length of time to get an answer – let alone the years to get a decision on asylum and immigration matters. And too many other problems with visas, residency, naturalisation, lost documents – an endless stream of the victims of Home Office failure. Unbelievable. And housing – the issues around housing have given me such a good overview of, not only the shortage, but also the issues around allocation.
In fact, in the chapter I have written to be published in a book in the autumn called Britain after Blair, is based in part on this experience. For what I see is a mish-mash of decisions, with poor reasoning behind them, no transparency and often highly unsatisfactory rules. Thanks to this muddled approach, people can wait decade after decade waiting to be re-housed in a points system where they never reach the top. And then there is the threatening approach to anyone who doesn’t take what is offered, however absolutely dreadful it is. The threat is – take it, no matter how bad it is, or you lose your right to be offered again. Anyway – could go on and on – but you’ll just have to buy the book!
Certainly, my direction is heavily influenced by my experience of my local constituents’ problems – as indeed it should be – but I think most people think of an MP as someone at Parliament and see only that side – or the giving out prizes or the visiting things (the Queen Mum bit of the job). These are all important – but to me it’s still people’s lives that are the challenge. Of course – that challenge can then be expanded to lobby at the Parliamentary level to put the pressure on to change the way things are.
As for Parliament itself – that’s been an experience and a half. I’ve learned how to lead on a Bill and take it through committee – which at committee stage is akin to being a lawyer. I’ve learned how to get called to speak in a debate (be very nice to Mr Speaker and advise him in advance of my wish to speak and special reason why he should call me), put oral questions (including one to David Blunkett and he was gone the next day – be afraid, be very afraid) and literally hundreds of written questions. I haven’t been selected for a Westminster Hall debate (yet) or an oral question to the Prime Minister – but I’m putting in for the ballot and am determined to get lucky in the next session. (If you have any mystic seaweed I can waive to raise my chances in the ballot, just pop it in the post please).
I’ve taken school governors to meet the Ministers’ officials and met with hundreds of different lobbies who have come about one thing or another. I’ve put in written questions and done masses of media. I’ve sponsored local groups who have wanted to come to Parliament to have a room for a debate and talked to lots of local school groups who have come up to the House, had a tour and then get to grill me for half an hour. It’s quite different to the other levels of governance I have been elected to thus far – local council and London Assembly. They were more direct in a way whilst this is a legislature – and the immediacy and directness is less obvious.
I’ve witnessed and taken part in some of the great debates of the day on detention without charge, on ID cards, on religious hatred and so on. I have experience the Commons in sombre mode following 7/7. There is a lot of humour there too – some cruel but some just comradely. The formality and the format are not to my taste – but in the year I have tried to learn how best to use my time there.
Parliament is caught in a time warp in my view. They don’t even use tracking changes for legislation and amendments which I find astonishing. So each time you get a new pile of paperwork – there is no hint as to what has changed since last time. But my time there is not to fight the fight about the traditions or to worry about the so called ‘male’ environment – my time there is to represent my constituents and my conscience and my party.
I literally could not believe it when my Lib Dem councillor colleagues informed me that Labour had actually refused to let local residents speak on the proposed CPZs etc at the Haringey Council meeting on 17th July – despite residents turning up to express their views.
Not only would Labour not let local people speak then – but they also kept the issue off the agenda at the recent Muswell Hill Area Assembly. And to complete the hat-trick of secrecy and closed minds – none of the local councillors in Highgate, Muswell Hill, Alexandra and Fortis Green wards have been given a chance to have a say on the plans for their wards either. Whether it’s directly or through their elected representatives – the council clearly doesn’t want to listen to the public.
The Area Assembly should be the forum where problems should be discussed in embryo – long before concrete proposals are agreed and put to public consultation. That is the forum where a proper assessment of local parking stress needs to be brought first, along with a clear published statistical base outlining the current parking and traffic situation. That is the way to discuss an issue like this sensibly. And if there’s no problem and no public demand for action – then the issue can be put to bed long before lots of council time and money have been spent working up plans.
Labour have shown a shocking lack of concern for the views and wishes of the people of Haringey. I have written to the Chief Executive asking for the responses to the now closed consultation to be not only available to local councillors (they refused to show them to Fortis Green councillor Martin Newton – that’s another secret the council is keeping) but also to any local resident who wishes to examine them. They could easily be put up on the Council website.
There will be residents in favour and residents against Labour’s proposed parking plans but I doubt if there will be anyone who believes Labour have approached this in a proper and inclusive manner. The methodology is so brutish that almost everyone who has written to me is convinced this is just a way of raising revenue and bears little relationship to solving any real problems.
And that is a real shame, because it means the debate risks boiling down to "big CPZ" versus "nothing" when in fact there’s a host of details, such as yellow lines, number and location of pay and display bays, hours of parking restrictions, rules of discretion for traffic wardens, design of junctions, policy on parking in driveways, and so on and on, and I doubt very much whether the details on every one of these measures has been got 100% right across every last part of the area. But when the council blunders in that way it has, what chance is there of genuine parking and traffic issues getting a hearing and a productive discussion getting going amongst residents and local businesses?
… as talked about in my latest column.
Tensions are running high in Noel Park, as demands are made for Labour-run Haringey Council to put pressure on its contractors to complete repair works on the basketball court and play area at the Noel Park Recreation Ground.
The children’s playground was removed two years ago when the new play centre was built and has never been replaced. Work began on the site at the beginning of June to demolish the basketball court so that the new work can commence, yet as the scheduled completion date of the end of August nears, it is becoming clear that the project is in danger of overrunning.
Sadly, at a time when superb weather has seen local kids desperate to stay out of doors, the basketball court has been dug up and fenced off.
Noel Park councillor Catherine Harris comments:
“Working with Lynne Featherstone MP, we have managed to get the fencing secured after it was vandalised. The Lib Dems have been calling for an accurate update on the new play area. We have been assured that the work will be finished on time, but we are concerned that it does seem likely that there will be yet another delay.”
Noel Park councillor Fiyaz Mughal comments:
“It is a real shame that the work had to be carried out during the summer months – local youngsters are obviously missing the use of the court. At the moment, kids are resorting to playing in the street, which is obviously not as safe as the park. We will continue to keep an eye on the work here in the park, and put pressure on Haringey Council to ensure that the work is completed as quickly as possible.This really should have been completed long ago.”
Haringey Labour have been strongly criticised over the standards of care that are provided to residents, following the publication of annual performance figures. Of 13 Key Performance Indicators used to assess Haringey Council’s Social Service, eight missed their annual target and showed either a worsening trend or no improvement on the previous year.
The number of people who received a statement of their needs and how they would be met fell well short of the 95% target at just 69%, and just 44% of those cared for by Social Services received a review of their needs – the Council aims to review at least 75% of those receiving a service.
Lib Dem Spokesperson for Health and Social Services Richard Wilson comments:
“The fact that this Labour council has missed not just one or two, but eight of its 13 targets, is a cause for major concern. Labour have failed to carry out effective reviews of care, have failed to provide many with information as to how their needs will be met and failed to carry out timely assessments of need for new clients. This continuing underachievement year on year is simply not acceptable.”