Postal services in Haringey

Lynne Featherstone campaigning for better postal servicesFirst of two evening meetings. It is a meeting to begin to put together a group of volunteers to start a postal pressure group. Following the postal services survey I carried out earlier this year – and to which I had a mammoth response – I want to put together a practical and constructive group to keep a watching and testing brief on how we recipients are being treated.

The survey identified a number of issues, the main ones being around theft and loss of mail, damaged mail, delays, miss-deliveries, complaints not being acted on, getting a card through your door saying no-one was in to receive a parcel when someone had be in; and so on. For some people it’s a minor irritation, for some it’s a significant problem and for a some – whose business and livelihood depend on the postage service – it’s an absolute nightmare. (And as ever in public life when you take up an issue – there are one or two people who think it doesn’t matter at all and can’t possibly imagine that it might matter to anyone else either!).

We had a senior person from Royal Mail and we went through all of the issues and how we might work together to actually make a difference. We agreed to put a group together with a relatively tight agenda which would focus on the do-able and the local! I have some volunteers willing to take this on – but anyone who is interested and reads this is welcome to contact me if they would like to be involved. I will be reporting more fully on the meeting and the way forward in due course.

The US and extradition

Ming played a blinder today at Prime Minister’s Questions. He went on the unequal arrangements we have with the US about extradition. They can extradite who they like from us with just evidence that the person they want is the person they want. No evidence required about the quality of the case or charges against them. On the other hand, if we want to extradite someone from the US to here – different rules apply. We have to provide evidence that there is a good case for them to answer.

So the simple question is – if that’s what we have to do to extradite someone from the US, why don’t the same rules (and protection) apply to someone the US wants to get from here? To add insult to injury the US hasn’t even ratified the extradition agreement with the UK under which they can extradite people from the UK.

Tony B is on the back foot and it is Ming’s best performance to date!

One of our local councillors contacts me to say that the organisers of the biggest Muslim event in Europe, which will be held at Ally Pally tomorrow, have asked if I would like to be on the platform. I would love to – but with such late notice sadly I cannot go as I have been put down for a debate in Parliament at exactly the opening time. So I have sent a message that I hope will be read saying: ‘I am so sorry that Parliamentary business prevents me being here in person. I welcome everyone to Alexandra Palace for this momentous event. In these difficult times, I wish all communities peace and good will. We share this world – and we all have a right to respect and peace.’ It will be quite an occasion!

I'm given a set of teachers

Cut out teachers! No – not cut them out but paper cut-outs! I go to Bounds Green School to receive the cut-outs that the children have done so that I can give them to Tony Blair and remind him of his promise to ensure that every child in the world has the opportunity of going to school by the year 2015. It is a mammoth challenge. For example – Bangladesh alone needs 167,000 teachers and Africa three million.

The children come into assembly in the hall and I talk to them for a bit about the challenge and about the poverty around the world that means that what our kids take for granted, many millions of children around the world don’t even have a chance of – especially girls. One girl asks a really good question at the end. She asked how we would make sure that the money was used properly. That’s something we all want to know and I will put the question to T Blair!

Straight on to North London Schools Exhibition on their work on International Networking. This is a project in Haringey which links schools with those in other countries through their teachers, teaching and pupil contact – and there were some fantastic projects on display. I was really thrilled by the kids there whose horizons will have been forever widened by the experiences of this project. I believe it is really important to give children a vision of a much wider world than their own daily lives. If I think back to my school days, I don’t particularly remember my lessons – but what I do remember is the trips we took, my foreign pen pals, the direct contact with others from other countries. Those memories and experiences shape your thinking.

Haringey Shed

Earlier in the day I went to see Haringey Shed (a theatre workshop grouping which mixes children with some disabilities with those without). It has a phenomenal reputation for its work. It has become so popular that there is a waiting list a mile long despite its recent expansion to the west of the borough.

The kids are just wonderful – and do a few workshop exercises before running through a rehearsal of the performance they are giving next Saturday. But what the group really needs is funding for one more staff salary. It is a charity and it has some support at the moment from Haringey Council. It can make bids for capital expenditure to granting and funding organisations, but the funding is not for things like salaries – but for projects and the like. So we scratch our heads about who might be willing to fund three years of one person’s salary.
I kid you not – this is such a wonderful idea – doing exactly what we need in our society today. Bringing everyone together – all colours and all creeds!

So if anyone has any ideas for funding or wants to donate – please let me know and I will put you directly in touch with Haringey Shed.

Noel Park playground

Lynne Featherstone with local parents in Noel ParkLocal parents have contacted me in desperation as their children face a second summer without play equipment at the Noel Park Recreation Ground. I meet with a representative of the Parents Forum in the park where the playground should be. She has two of her four children with her who will be without this summer. I understand the equipment was taken out when the Children’s Centre was being built – the promise was that it would be replaced with new equipment when the Centre was finished. It has been finished now for some time and despite repeated promises, there is still no sign of the new equipment being installed.

There have been meetings to view plans and discussions with the Council’s consultant – so it is hard to imagine what could be holding up the delivery and implementation. There was plenty of time to plan its installation whilst the building was ongoing. As for cost: it was always going to be needed in the budget – so I cannot imagine that it is a budgetary problem.

I have written to the Chief Executive of Haringey Council to find out what the delay is. The Labour administration originally gave assurances that they would replace the equipment so I am turning to the management to speedily make it happen. If the CE comes back and says the hold up is because the administration have not given it the go ahead and therefore they are breaking their promises – we will then know who to blame!

Alongside this issue, there is also the issue of the equipment to be provided for young people in the grounds too. It is clear from the vandalism already taking place (graffiti on the doors and broken window of the new Centre) that it is vital that their area is also resolved as soon as possible. But first things first. It’s a long summer and Noel Park Rec Ground is quite a lovely open space – it just needs what has been promised!

The future of Fortismere School

Several people responded to my blog posting about my meeting with Fortismere’s Head and the Chair of Governors.

The main thrust of the comment was the bit in my blog entry about the ‘categoric assurances’ I had received from the Head of Governors that there had been no discussion about becoming a Trust School.

I have been shown a copy of the Strategic Planning Paper prepared for the Governors by the previous Acting Head, which lists Trust Schools as a possible course for the school, and am now told that this was ‘fully discussed’ by them in a Governing Body meeting in May this year.

The second thread of concern seems to be around the Head’s intentions with regard to access to Fortismere for statemented children. Where the Head made it quite clear to me in my meeting with him that any statemented child would be able to name Fortismere as their chosen school – there is a counter view that there is a strategy in here somewhere to reduce the number of statemented children coming to the school.

I do not know where the truth actually lies on these issues. What I do know is that we are talking about the future of a school, a wonderful school, where we need the Head, the Governors, the teachers and the parents and pupils to all support whatever route is taken for the future. Therefore, it is paramount that there is no equivocation around the truth. With so much conflicting information around, it would be helpful to have a written declaration of intent signed by the Head and Board of Governors which addresses all the concerns and on which the parents could then vote in a proper democratic ballot. Then whatever the settled will of the parents it would be a basis on which all could move forward together with a common understanding.

Community development – what do the Government's plans amount to?

Friday / Saturday was spent away, doing my duties as a trustee of the Community Development Foundation. And now I do know a lot more. I am on this as it requires an MP from each of the three main parties. The Labour MP is the Chair of the Board of Trustees and the rest of the members are made up from the four nations of the United Kingdom and from a range of high-level expertise.

As this was my first meeting, I do what I usually do when I am new: I read my papers thoroughly and kept my mouth mostly shut except where necessary! The senior management of the Foundation were also with us. It was clear at the first session that a great deal of work and energy was being put into this agenda – but that the Trustees were needing more access to the business processes and issues involved.

‘Community Development’ is about empowering members of the community and growing their capacity to influence decisions being made about their lives. Many of us, we know how to complain, how to raise issues, how to engage, how to access services, etc. – but there are even more who do not. And in the end, a community can only improve if it comes from within – so it’s about building from the within. To demonstrate some of this, we were taken by coach to Gamesley – a housing estate of some 3,500 people who had been uprooted from the middle of Manchester when it was redeveloped and put literally in the middle of nowhere. With rolling hills and sheep and farmland all around, it didn’t have the dirt and grime and sort of deprivation I as a London MP are used to – but deprived it certainly was. High level of single parents and unemployment, little transport to get to it or off it, low car ownership and so on.

We were talked to by the ‘workers’ on the estate – from adult education to Sure Start, police, residents’ association, Citizens Advice Bureau, local library manager, and so on. The enthusiasm of these individuals about their purpose and task was extremely high – and their partnership and cross-working was clearly beginning to have some results in getting people to engage and acquire skills. They had produced some really great community projects that had drawn in participation from people who never usually got involved in anything – and this was clearly creating community spirit and improving the estate. Back afterwards to the hotel for more papers and discussions.

So what did I think? I agree with the principle that the more engaged and participatory a community is, the better it will function and prosper. What worried me was concerns over whether some of the good intentions will turn out to be mere rhetoric. I have seen consultation devalued because the outcome wasn’t really ever in question. I have seen councils engaging local communities through various forums, but mostly it is about presenting what the council is doing – not listening to what local people necessarily want. Still – I am glad to have been appointed to this body as it is a really interesting area of work.

As I said previously, my only real connection to this scheme before was when I was asked to give out government cheques to various community groups as part of the program. And it was not just a cheque or two – but lots and thousands and thousands of pounds. I was worried then as to whether this money would empower people and how that was assessed – indeed if it was assessed. There were no answers yet to my questions – but at least they are now in the pot. There are so many initiatives, schemes and work programs going on – and such vast amounts of money being spent on them – I want to be sure that they produce real differences for the people in communities in whose name so much is being done.

As for today, I have just been writing articles, doing emails and my Ham & High column. Watched the Sunday morning political programs to see coverage of by-elections and hear the analysis of the disastrous Tory result in Bromley. Again the media are letting Boy David off relatively lightly considering the scale of his party’s drubbing. But there’s no hiding from his problem – core voters don’t appear to like where he wishes to take the party – and I don’t think there are enough votes without them for him to gain the seats he needs. Labour too had a bad night – they are the government and in big stink at the moment. Received wisdom is that they should get a bashing in by-elections at this point – but the official opposition should be way ahead, and they certainly were not!

Bromley by-election

Wow! Stunning result in Bromley and Chislehurst. A big boost for the party to come so close (agonisingly close!) to winning what was one of the very safest Conservative seat in the country.

For us the lesson is fairly simple – it’s a shame that Ben Abbotts didn’t quite make it, but it was a fantastic result for him and the team. Also good news for Ming Campbell – he campaigned heavily in the seat.

But for the Tories – it’s a real dilemma I think. Clearly the Cameron message is not going down well with their core support. They should have been romping home in a safe seat like Bromley. When I was campaigning there, it certainly looked like the sort of place that is very Conservative. Not any more!

Now off to a weekend meeting of the Government’s Community Development Foundation (I’m a trustee) to see how the development of community cohesion is going and can be worked on. It seems from the outside like a very New Labour approach – but will be interesting to see from the inside how it’s going and whether that’s really the case.

One part of the overall agenda is the looking at the community empowerment network. Having handed out the cheques in Haringey to various voluntary groups as part of this scheme, I have been wondering how the success or otherwise of these payments is tracked. Will be interesting to see!

Two more bites of Big Brother

Another Statutory Instrument – but this time in committee and about extra powers being given to a variety of agencies with regard to intercept and communications data, and also about powers for covert surveillance and so on. Too complicated to relate now – but together the two do rather sum up what politics – and Labour’s approach – is heavily about at the moment.