HARINGEY MUST PLUG DANGEROUS MANHOLE

Labour-run Haringey Council is coming under criticism for their inability to respond to requests to make safe a large open manhole that poses a serious risk of injury.

Lib Dem councillor Bob Hare discovered the open manhole while walking down Park Road in Crouch End last week, and reported it to Haringey Council in order that they could cover it and make it safe for pedestrians. A week later, the manhole remained open, partially covered only by a piece of chipboard barely big enough to cover the hole, placed there by a resident.

Councillor Bob Hare comments:

“This manhole is over three feet deep, and the only effort to make it safe seems to have been to place a traffic cone over the top. Older residents and young children are especially at risk, but anyone could have fallen in and badly injured themselves. Labour need to take urgent steps to ensure that this level of negligence doesn’t happen in the future.”

Control orders

Pinch, punch, first of the month and no returns! Constituency matters today and am on media duty as our Shadow Home Secretary (Nick Clegg) is away. Today’s big issue is the report of the JCHR (Joint Committee on Human Rights) in regard of Control Orders. It’s not an earth shattering surprise – and its findings are in line with our position on the whole.

What the Government really should do instead is to change the law to allow intercept evidence to be used in court. Other developed countries use this very obvious tool for evidence – so why a Government that is happy to incarcerate people and take away their human rights should suddenly get coy about an absolutely practical way to gather evidence is beyond me.

Anyway – later in the day the Government lost its appeal on Control Orders and so will have to go back to the drawing board on how to achieve its aims without turning into the sort of country using the sort of practises that we condemn in any other part of the world.

PRISON STAFF UNABLE TO COPE – FEATHERSTONE

Figures obtained by the Liberal Democrats show that the Prison Service lost 589,471 working days during 2005/06 due to sickness, an average of more than twelve sick days a year for each member of staff.

The statistics were revealed today by Liberal Democrat Home Affairs Spokesperson, Lynne Featherstone MP.

She said:

“As the prison population continues to soar, it is no wonder that prison staff feel overburdened. The Government needs to shift its focus from chasing headlines to its front line services and the staff they depend on.

“With working conditions for prison staff having deteriorated to such a low, how will they be motivated to help prisoners break the vicious cycle of re-offending?

“As the prison population continues to expand, stress and sickness amongst beleaguered staff is only going to increase.”

Notes:

The statement was obtained through a written parliamentary question where the Secretary of State for the Home Department was asked to reply directly to Lynne Featherstone MP.

During 2005/06 the number of working days lost due to sickness absence was 589,471 among prison staff. The Home Office 2006 Departmental Report lists 46,128 Prison Service staff.

REPORT REVEALS GOVERNMENT'S FAILURES ON TERRORISM

Commenting on the Joint Committee Report on Counter-Terrorism policy and Human Rights, Liberal Democrat Home Affairs Spokesperson, Lynne Featherstone MP said:

“This report shows how badly wrong the Government has got its terrorism legislation.

“The Government is willing to lock up suspects without charge but isn’t willing to use intercept evidence to convict. We have to ask, what is the purpose of their incarceration if not to convict?

“The Government has been rattling sabres about extending the 28 day period without charge. This reports put a nail in that coffin.

“These laws were supposed to allow the police time for further investigation so that the suspect could be brought to justice. The Government needs to tell us what on earth has been going on.

“Clearly we have been misled over the use of the terror law of detention without charge. If the suspect is not being investigated during incarceration – then that detention is being conducted under false pretences.”