BIG TURNOUT NEEDED FOR CPZ MEETING, SAY HIGHGATE'S LIB DEM COUNCILLORS

Highgate’s Lib Dem councillors are urging Highgate residents to turn out in large numbers on 6 November for a special ‘neighbourhood assembly’ meeting that they have secured on the Controlled Parking Zone (CPZ) proposals for the area.

The Lib Dems say the meeting will be a big chance for local people to hear about the councils CPZ plans for Highgate at first hand, and to ask questions.The meeting is to take place at Highgate Primary School, North Hill at 7.30 pm.

Haringey Council has not granted Highgate its own ‘area assembly’ so the Lib Dems have secured two special meetings per year for Highgate residents to give their views on council issues. Next Wednesday’s meeting is the first of these.

Lib Dem councillor Bob Hare comments:

“This meeting will give residents a chance to have their say on the CPZ plans, and I would urge as many Highgate residents as possible to attend. In addition, we have set up a survey on our website and would welcome as many returns as possible.”

'UNACCEPTABLE' PLANS TO CLOSE MUSWELL HILL AFTER SCHOOL CLUB

A Lib Dem councillor has intervened in an attempt by Haringey Council to close a vital after school club for kids in Muswell Hill. The move follows protests by a Muswell Hill parent, who wrote to Ms Featherstone saying, “This is one of the rare Haringey services that is really valued by all who receive it.”

Lynne Featherstone, Lib Dem councillor for Muswell Hill, says attempts by Haringey’s Labour-run council to close the Grove After School Club in Muswell Hill are “quite unacceptable” and the council should act now to eliminate the staff shortages which it say will result in the closure of the facility in January. Children from Muswell Hill Primary School and other local schools use the popular club.

Haringey Council has just notified parents that the club will be closed from 20th December until 27th January due to “shortage of staff”.

Lynne Featherstone says that the council plans for the long closure fly in the face of government policy to remove barriers to work – particularly for women.

Lynne Featherstone comments:

“Closing this centre for such a long period would be a real blow to local parents, who rely on it to provide vital daytime child care. Clearly, the council needs to move swiftly to provide staff cover for this period. With all this advance warning about possible staff shortages, the council has plenty of time to put in place arrangements to deal with the problem.”

ATTEMPTS TO MAKE RESIDENTS PAY FOR DISABLED RAMP "A DISGRACE"

A Highgate Lib Dem councillor has labelled ‘a disgrace’ attempts by Haringey’s ruling Labour council to charge residents for the installation of a long-demanded disabled ramp at a block of flats in Highgate.

Lib Dem councillor Neil Williams, who has been campaigning for the need for disabled access to Dowding House, on the Hillcrest Estate, says the council is now telling the leaseholders in the block that they will have to fork out for the planned disabled ramp. When Councillor Williams raised this earlier in the year with the council, he was told that all matters would be up for consideration during the consultation.

The move comes on top of revelations, uncovered by Councillor Williams, that Haringey Council is raking in tens of thousands of pounds in profits from unsightly rooftop aerials fitted on the roofs of Dowding House and the other historic blocks on the Hillcrest estate.Despite the massive annual windfall of £50,000, the mean-spirited Labour council wants the block’s leaseholders to pay to bring disabled access up-to-date.

Neil Williams comments:

“Haringey’s handling of this matter is becoming a very distressing story. Asking all leaseholders to pay is putting disabled residents in an impossible position – and I was assured that this matter would be up for discussion. Instead, the residents seem to have been issued with a fait accompli.

“I am really outraged that the council rakes in £50,000 from the rooftop aerials but seems to want to do anything rather than pay for this improvement. This is a major building and it should have disabled access.

“It is deplorable that Haringey Council can earn so much money as a direct result of the buildings advantageous height, but when it comes to sorting out a design defect, they say the residents will have to pay.It is not good enough.”

ESTIMATES OF NEXT YEAR'S COUNCIL TAX RISE ABOVE THE SYMBOLIC £1,100 MARK FOR 2003/4

Haringey Council has increased its estimate for the likely rise in council tax over the coming year.Local residents could see a dramatic rise of 13% in their bills this year, with a total rise over four years of nearly half (42%).

The latest figures were given to the Labour Executive for its 22 October meeting and take the projected figure for the total council tax bill for residents for 2003/4 above the £1,100 mark for a typical Band D payer. Haringey’s part of the bill would go up by 13% to £916.60.

Under the current Labour plans, the total bill for local taxpayers, including money collected by Mayor Ken Livingstone, could mean that a band D council tax, currently £983, rises to over £1,400 in 2006/2007.

Lib Dems have accused the Labour party of hypocrisy over the issue. During the recent council elections, Labour boasted about freezing council tax levels while at the same time was making behind-the-scenes preparations to reveal their plans for massive tax increases.

In its recent election manifesto, just five months ago, Haringey Labour told local voters that: “the Council’s finances are now in a sound state, with council tax having been frozen for the past three years.”

Lib Dem budget spokesman, Cllr Jonathan Bloch, says:

“Haringey’s estimates of the council tax seem to be moving ever higher.It is no surprise that the Labour council has moved to scupper plans for a Budget Committee to properly scrutinise their work. It does not bode well for the future. These huge projected increases will be an impossible burden on the borough.”

How Labour’s council tax plans add up:

Annual inflation estimate Forecast annual real rise in Haringey’s part of council tax Total annual % rise in Haringey’s part of council tax Band D rate, including GLA precept Cumulative total % increase in council tax
2002/3 983.00
2003/4 2.5% 10.8% 13.3% 1110.75 13%
2004/5 2.5% 3.7% 6.2% 1179.61 20%
2005/6 2.5% 4.9% 7.4% 1266.99 29%
2006/7 2.5% 8.0% 10.5% 1399.93 42%

Note: Band D figures include the GLA precept, whose figures have been projected based on past performance.

SOCIAL SERVICES INSPECTORS ADMIT BLUNDERS OVER SOCIAL SERVICES SURVEY

The Government’s Social Services Inspectorate has admitted to serious shortcomings over Haringey Council’s controversial attempts to interfere with an investigation carried out by the SSI into Haringey’s children’s services earlier this year.

In a response to letters from Lib Dem social services spokesperson, Cllr Ron Aitken, and Lib Dem leader, Cllr Lynne Featherstone, the SSI has admitted that another organisation, and not Haringey Council, should have been used to assist with or collect the controversial questionnaire.

The move follows the uncovering of the issue by the local Lib Dems and The Guardian newspaper. In a letter to Denise Platt, Chief Inspector of the SSI, Lib Dem Leader Lynne Featherstone accused the Labour-run council of:

1.Making direct contact with the recipients of SSI questionnaires, despite the fact that the information accompanying the questionnaires assured users that they were ‘anonymous’.

2.Offering home visits by council staff in order to “help” recipients to fill in the forms. One person, for example, was rung by Council staff who endeavoured to make an appointment for someone to call round to help her fill in the form.

3.Asking at least one recipient of the survey form if they had brought it along to a case conference.The council had apparently planned to collect the forms rather than have them sent directly to the SSI.

The Lib Dems are now asking Haringey Council to explain why their staff were collecting survey forms, when the SSI has told the Lib Dems: “”there is no need and we do not wish [it]”.

Lib Dem Social Services spokesperson, Ron Aitken, comments:

“This news exposes the disgraceful handling of this matter by Haringey Council. They have claimed the SSI’s inspector was happy with their procedures, but the SSI has now said this is not the case.

“Instead of its usual tactic of giving anything other than a straight answer, Haringey must now explain why its officials were collecting forms that were sent out by the SSI with stamped addressed envelopes and should not have been interfered with.”

CROUCH END COUNCILLORS ACT OVER PARKING ZONE PLANS

Crouch End’s Liberal Democrat councillors have taken action to ensure confidence in the council’s consultation programme on a Controlled Parking Zone (CPZ) in Crouch End.

As a result of discussions last week between Councillors Ron Aitken, David Winskill and Haringey Council, they have now reached agreement that there will be further consultation in November and also a ‘listening day’ where local residents will have a further chance to express their views.

To double-check the consultation exercises being carried out by the council, the Lib Dems are also conducting their own survey on the issue. This survey will also ask residents’ views on a wider range of possible traffic measures, such as making better use of the council’s car park at Hornsey Town Hall, which could be opened to the public in evenings and at weekends.

Furthermore, Crouch End councillors believe that if there is to be no huge new restaurant on the BT site, as seems increasingly likely, then consequently there is no need for a CPZ.

Lib Dem councillor Ron Aitken comments:

“I want to make sure that no stone is left unturned to ensure that everyone’s views are heard.That is why we are taking these new actions.

“We must also be clear that without the restaurant, there should be no CPZ. And residents should also be given a clear chance to express their views on other possible measures apart from a CPZ – such as better use of Hornsey Town Hall car park or chevron parking in some streets. Regardless of the CPZ issue, there are other traffic and transport issues in Crouch End which need tackling.”

You can let Cllr Aitken and his colleagues have your views on the CPZ proposals using the form below.

MELANIE SIMPSON WANTS ACTION ON HIGHGATE NORTH HILL SPEEDING

A Highgate Lib Dem councillor has demanded that action is taken to tackle speeding on North Hill, one of Highgate’s busiest residential and feeder roads. Cllr Melanie Simpson wants action from the police and the council, as she says cars are regularly speeding and there are not enough clearly visible warning signs.

North Hill forms a busy junction with the A1 Great North Road. The Lib Dems say that local residents have reported speeding of up to 70mph down the road. The recently elected Lib Dem councillor is also concerned about heavy vehicles, which are ignoring the weight restrictions on the road.

Councillor Melanie Simpson comments:

“We have taken up the issue of heavy vehicles with the police, and at least the council have agreed to cut back the trees to make signs more visible at the other end of the road.In the medium term however this is one of those stretches of road where drivers seem to know they can get away with horrendous speeding. As a next step, we need more warning signs along the route to discourage drivers from using North Hill as a speedway.”

Cos I said so

Occasionally, and when I’m in a benign frame of mind, I ask my children for their opinion on a decision I am making. I try not to make a habit of it – because (despite being a liberal) more often than not, the truth is that I have already made up my mind what we are going to do that day or what I have decided they can wear to a family ‘do’ where trainers would be outré.

However, on those occasions when I do consult my offspring, I do try and deliver the outcome they voice as desirable.

Mayor Livingstone clearly hasn’t got the hang of this yet – that consultation has to have a point. That people, if asked their opinion or asked to vote on a local transport issue, expect the outcome of the consultation to reflect their collective views in some measure.

At the Assembly this week, the Mayor came in for severe criticism (from me and other Assembly members) for taking no notice of the results of his consultations – if they don’t deliver the result he wants.

Two recent examples included a small consultation on the re-routeing of the P13 bus, which goes from Streatham, via Southwark, to Surrey Quays. A huge majority voted in favour of one route – but the Mayor decided to ignore this and route the bus where he wanted it to go all along. When challenged, his explanation boiled down to ‘Cos I say so and I’m the Mayor’.

The other example was on a new tram line through West London where huge swathes of residents didn’t even receive the consultation and where the plans on which they were consulted have since been declared erroneous in content. And yet, the Mayor has used this first consultation to make an initial decision – regardless of the fact it was flawed.

His constant cry is – if you don’t like it, vote me out next time. Not good enough Ken!

I am so sick of consultations that are really public relations exercises for the local council or in this case the Mayor, that I had a real go at him in the Assembly. If the Mayor’s made up his mind to do something, he should say so – not dress it up in a meaningless consultation.

I asked Ken to agree to a ‘Consultation Charter’ which would make clear to those he was consulting exactly what their answers could affect and what was not changeable.

Ken is cavalier and contemptuous on the issue of consultation and if you haven’t yet experienced one of the Mayor’s so-called consultations yourself – just wait until you do. Consultation is important and the constant abuse of the process is devaluing its real value and benefit.

I know from the feedback I get through the post and via my website, http://www.lynnefeatherstone.org, how useful and well-considered the views you get through consultation often are. Those using public services day-to-day often spot things that elected representatives miss – and genuinely listening to them means we can do a better job.

Although Ken banged on for a bit longer about being the Mayor and it being up to him to make decisions, he did agree to work with the Transport Committee of the Assembly on a ‘Consultation Toolkit’. This will hopefully mean in the future that there will be more of a point to the Mayor’s consultations.

That would be a welcome change. After all, if I took Ken’s approach into my own home environment, it would be like asking my kids what they want for dinner when the pizza delivery man was, in reality, already on the way!

LIB DEMS TO HOST MEETING ON CONNAUGHT HOUSE PROBLEMS

Muswell Hill Lib Dem Councillor, Cllr Ross Laird, has arranged a meeting at 7.00pm, 4 November at St Mary’s and St George’s Church Hall, Cranley Gardens, to discuss the future of Connaught House, Connaught Gardens.

The meeting has been called after a series of complaints by residents about the state of repair of the block of flats. The meeting will be attended by Housing 21, who manage the property on behalf of the Metropolitan Police, but the police have declined to attend, saying they could not at this stage bring anything useful to the meeting.

Cllr Laird commented:

“After months of relative inaction by the Metropolitan Police and Housing 21, we have had to set up this meting to try and force the pace of change. I welcome Housing 21’s decision to participate in finding solutions, but I am deeply concerned about the intransigence of the Metropolitan Police, who have refused so far to release the necessary funds to improve the property. We hope to have a positive meeting and investigate whether a residents’ association could or should be formed.”

COUNCIL BUDGET – LIB DEMS CONDEMN FURTHER BLOW TO VITAL WATCHDOG COMMITTEES

Lib Dems have condemned what they describe as further attempts by Haringey Council to undermine Haringey’s vital new scrutiny system – this time over the council’s controversial budget setting process.

The council’s move to block a vital new Budget Scrutiny Committee was confirmed at Monday’s night’s meeting of the Overview and Scrutiny Committee at Haringey’s Civic Centre.

The Lib Dems say that Haringey’s council tax, set to rise dramatically by over 40% in the next four years on current projections, will not now receive the proper scrutiny that it needs. The Lib Dems are accusing Haringey Labour of deliberate political manoeuvring to stop a new Budget Scrutiny Committee from coming into being.

Haringey Labour had initially agreed to allow the Lib Dems to chair the new committee – but then attempts were made to block a deal that would have given the new body an independent adviser to carry out its work – despite this being the norm on other council committees. The council’s budget setting process will now be scrutinised at just one special meeting of the Overview and Scrutiny Committee in November.

Lib Dem councillor Jonathan Bloch, comments: “This has been another disgraceful episode for Haringey’s handling of the scrutiny system. They have again shown contempt for the whole process, just as they did in the summer, when they insisted that Labour chaired all of Haringey’s new watchdog committees, breaking recommended guidelines. This is a very controversial budget process that could see council tax soar.It will not now have the vital scrutiny from councillors that it needs.”