LIB DEMS GIVE GUARDED WELCOME TO GOVERNMENT PLANS FOR HARINGEY SCHOOLS

Liberal Democrats have welcomed long awaited plans unveiled by the Government this week to invest money in improving schools in Haringey, but have questioned details of the schemes.

New money, part of the London Challenge strategy, is planned to fund a new secondary school and sixth form as well as refurbishing and rebuilding all the borough’s schools by 2010. However the Lib Dems have warned that lessons must be learned from the failures of PFI for schools before proceeding and that money for building and improving must be matched with funding to recruit and retain good quality teaching staff.

Lib Dem Leader Ross Laird says that Haringey has, over the past few years, been the subject of a number of ‘false dawns’ for education, with the Government using the Labour run council as a testing ground for many new initiatives. The Lib Dems hope that this is not another initiative that will slowly die away after the media has lost interest.

Cllr Laird is particularly concerned at the potential waste of funds. Over the past few years many of Haringey’s poorer schools have undergone expensive refurbishment. Now, in light of these new plans, the same refurbished buildings could be pulled down and replaced by new ones less than five years after the improvements. Although he accepts that improvements are necessary, he is concerned at the lack of long term planning by the Council, education authority and Government and that this will lead to waste.

There are also serious concerns regarding the targets set out in the proposals. Since PFI was introduced for building schools in the borough many projects have failed to meet deadlines with schools closing early and opening late. The result is many schools losing valuable weeks off the school year or having to endure disruptions while building work continues during term time.

Cllr Laird is most concerned about the lack of emphasis from the Government and the Council with regard to improving teaching conditions. He says that although an improved working environment will make teaching and learning more enjoyable, unless greater support is given to staff recruitment and retention many of the problems in Haringey schools will continue.

Cllr Ross Laird comments:

“Finally schools in Haringey look like they will get some meaningful funding which could bring our schools into the 21st Century. Lib Dems have campaigned hard for greater investment in local schools. The Council must ensure that spending on schools is well planned and waste does not happen.

“Ultimately the Council, and the Government must tackle the problem of recruiting and retaining staff in Haringey. Until that issue is resolved education in the borough will continue to suffer.”

HIGHGATE – LIB DEMS CALL FOR REGULAR SWEEP FOR 'TREACHEROUS' STATION PATHWAY

Highgate Liberal Democrat councillor Melanie Simpson has written to the Council asking for urgent action to ensure that a steep pathway between Wood Lane and Priory Gardens (to Highgate tube station) is regularly cleared of leaves and debris. The move follows a number of complaints from local residents many of whom use the route regularly to get to the tube station. Cllr Simpson has repeatedly called for action over the dangerous path.

The pathway is on very steep slope and is lined on both sides by trees, with the result that on wet days fallen leaves make the path extremely slippery and potentially very hazardous. Cllr Simpson is concerned that the Council and the station authorities will not take this issue seriously until someone has a serious accident on the path.

Cllr Melanie Simpson comments:

“Leaves are always a problem at this time of the year but this pathway is particularly hazardous. The Council must work with the station to take this more seriously. It is particularly steep and is used by the hundreds of people every day as a route to Highgate tube station.

“I am deeply concerned that someone will have a nasty accident unless there is action to address the problem, ensuring it is cleared frequently. I will be maintaining pressure on them until I see an improvement.”

SOCIAL SERVICES – ONE STAR RATING IS NOTHING TO CELEBRATE

The Liberal Democrats have welcomed the news that social services has seen an improvement in its star rating from zero to one star following an inspectors’ assessment. However, Social Services Spokesman Cllr Ron Aitken has warned Haringey Council not to become complacent, as there is a long way to go before services reach a level that reflects the investment that the Council has poured in since the publication of the Laming enquiry earlier this year.

Cllr Aitken is concerned by how ‘delighted’ Executive members have been with the news and that improvements must be kept in perspective, given the official “uncertain” rating. Cllr Aitken acknowledges that there has been an improvement and that this reflects the hard work and dedication of the grass roots staff. However, he is worried about the sustainability of these improvements due to a huge budget overspend and a large amount of new inexperienced staff being taken on.

Ron Aitken comments:

“I am pleased with the improvements that have occurred over the past twelve months. However for Executive members to be ‘delighted’ with this rating demonstrates from what a low base they have started to build. The fact that the Council is celebrating the improvement in prospects for children’s services from ‘poor’ in 2002 to ‘uncertain’ in 2003 is premature.

Lib Dem Parliamentary spokesperson, Cllr Lynne Featherstone adds:

“It is right that the Council has acknowledged the hard work of the staff but Haringey must now be looking to ensure that these improvements continue. I am very concerned that because of a heavily overspent budget this year and an influx of inexperienced staff, continuing improvement will rest largely on the political leadership of a very weak administration.”

'SHODDY' COUNCIL GETS 'BEST VALUE' PERFORMANCE FIGURES ALL WRONG

Haringey Liberal Democrats have expressed concern that Haringey’s blundering Labour Council has lost control of its ability to monitor the performance of the services it provides.

The move follows revelations last week that no less than 33 separate performance indicators were adjudged to be inaccurate in Haringey’s recent Best Value Performance Plan 2003/04 (BVPP). The inaccurate figures presented by the Labour council spread right across the borough’s services from corporate health to planning, and have been exposed by an independent audit.

The Lib Dems are particularly concerned that some of the figures are dramatically different to the original figures produced by the Council in the BVPP. The independent audit corrections include:

* Readjustment of ‘change in proportion of non-decent homes which were not decent at 1st April’ from -9.38% to +83.50% (difference of +92.88%)
* Readjustment of number of non-principle roads not needing major repair from 215,952 to 1,125 (difference -214,827)
* Readjustment of expenditure per pupil over 5 from £5,179 to £5,486 (difference of -£307)
* Readjustment of cost of waste collection per household from 40.92 to 43.53 (difference +£2.61)

Leader of the Opposition, Ross Laird acknowledges that many of the statistics placed in the BVPP were estimates due to the publication deadline having to be met.

However he says that these figures demonstrate the Council’s failure to adequately assess performance accurately across the services. He adds that many of the adjustments compound previous criticism made by the Lib Dem group over the Council’s failure to meet its own targets.

Ross Laird comments:

“We are deeply worried that the Council has managed to get so many of its figures so badly wrong. Some of the adjusted figures such as waste collection and pupil expenditure compound original statistics showing badly missed targets.

“This shoddy approach to the BVPP exposes the Council’s lack of organisation and management of its services. For the sake of local services, the Council must pull its socks up.”

POOR VOCATIONAL A-LEVEL RESULTS RAISE SERIOUS QUESTIONS

Cllr Ross Laird, Leader of the Opposition and Lib Dem Education Spokesperson, is calling for urgent action following analysis of this year’s A Level results in Haringey.

The Borough’s A Level results highlight two areas in particular as needing special attention – vocational qualifications and Information Technology results. Cllr Laird raised these points at the Education Scrutiny Committee meeting on Thursday 13th November.

“I am concerned that not enough emphasis is being given to vocational A Levels in Haringey,” says Cllr Laird. “Only 40% of our students gained an A-C grade in Business Studies and Economics – this compare badly with a national average of 69%.”

“Even more worrying is the incredibly low pass rate of around 15% for Information Technology and Computing A Levels. All these courses provide students with vital skills that can be utilised in their future careers. But we must give these areas our immediate attention to ensure that these opportunities are fully realised in the future.”

Notes:

Haringey A Level results (2003) at A-C grades:

Business Studies and Economics – 40% (national average 69%)
Computing – 16% (national average 53%)
Information Technology – 15% (national average 57%)

Buswatch

Buswatch AGM this afternoon.

I am so proud of Buswatch. I started it because as a bus campaigner I had been corresponding with about 200 people who were interested in various aspects of buses.

Eventually I thought it would be better if a non-political group could take this on – hence Buswatch. It has been going for about two years now and does a tremendous job of raising issues, monitoring services and generally doing exactly what its title says on behalf of West Haringey.

Mayor's budget deficit

Transport Committee this morning and we are hearing Transport for London present their business plan. Basic wheeze is that they have a balanced budget (they have to by law anyway) and for that money they could just about carry out their commitments to contracts already agreed and any safety work necessary.

Everything else – be that the West London Tram, better bus services, anything at all – the government has to give them the money. And the cost is around £900 million. The wheeze is that the way they present it isn’t about the Mayor having a pie in the sky wish list for which he has no money – but that if the Government don’t give him the money – they will be

condemning London to no improvements and indeed a worsening transport system. Clever hey?

CALLS FOR URGENT ACTION TO END LITTER DISPUTE

Cllr Lynne Featherstone is calling for Haringey Council to urgently address serious litter problems in Duckett Road and the surrounding Ladder roads. The situation has continued to deteriorate and residents have become increasingly frustrated at Haringey’s failure to keep the street litter-free.

Cllr Featherstone (Lib Dem) has written to the Council asking them to ensure an immediate improvement to street cleaning in the area.

“Local residents have been complaining about the very poor standard of street cleaning for months, but have seen no improvement to the service – a service which we all pay a lot of money for through our Council Tax,” explains Cllr Featherstone. “Being so close to the shopping centre, these roads clearly need more frequent sweeping. Litter is being allowed to build up and have a detrimental effect on people’s quality of life, not to mention the potential safety and health hazards, and this is simply unacceptable.”

Residents have been complaining to the Council for months, reporting that there is constantly rubbish building up in these streets, including foul smelling rubbish and food leftovers as well as bulky rubbish like discarded tyres and furniture. Some items are left for weeks or even months.

“Some of the problems can be solved easily,” says Cllr Featherstone. “For example, street sweepers often go along the road just before the refuse collectors, whereas with a bit of common sense planning they could sweep the road after, to much better effect.”

“Haringey Accord receive a huge chunk of local residents’ council taxes. The Council must ensure that at last we get value for money – without these basic failures. I will be working with my colleague Cllr Wayne Hoban to press the Council to ensure these changes are made.”

More congestion charging?

The Mayor is consulting on the proposed westward extension of the congestion charge zone.

He is required to consult with the Assembly – and the Assembly usually passes such responses to the appropriate committee, in this case the Transport Committee.

So I need to produce two outcomes – one is the Lib Dem response and one is to try and get a cross-party Assembly response. The latter will be quite a challenge in a year leading up to elections!

On the LibDem line – we are basically opposing the Mayor’s proposals. Now when the Tories oppose congestion charging, it’s political and because Steve Norris has already said he will remove the existing congestion charge. So – their position is the usual pro-car position.

However, when the LibDems oppose this proposed extension, there’s a good reason – as we are staunch supporters of the charge and I have always gone out there to bat for it against all the forces ranged against it in the run up to its go live last February.

However, this proposed extension is ill thought out, ill-conceived, rushed and economically apparently insane. Apart from that…

OK to explain:

Firstly – we don’t get the analysis of the first year of the charge until next spring. We have no accurate information on the effect on business, the economy or social impacts of the charge. Traffic impacts we do know, but not the rest. Only fools rush in where they haven’t a clue about the real effects of the charge. I think it has been a great policy and a great success – but I want to be very sure before making further decisions.

Secondly – whereas the original central charging area clearly covered the ground where the radial routes in and out the West End meant you would be targeting the working commuter for the most part, the extension to Kensington and Chelsea and the rest of Westminster is very residential by comparison and therefore quite a different scenario.

Also – the inmates (so to speak) would get a 90% discount. This extrapolated to any other areas of congestion charging logically would mean in the end everyone was discounted and therefore the charge would not inhibit travel.

Thirdly – outdated (yes already) technology means that this proposed extension takes it to the limit of its capacity. Any further extensions or areas in London which want or need a charge to deal with major traffic jams would have to have a completely new system.

The Mayor needs to do some strategic planning and change to Global Positioning Satellite system which would be able to target congestion hot spots wherever they were, or whatever time of day was crowded or whatever day of the week – anywhere in London. We need congestion charging to grow up, become more sophisticated so that it can work as a real tool in controlling traffic congestion anywhere.

This technology already exists – that is where we should be aiming. And all vehicles would have a little gismo / transponder – so that you are automatically charged if you enter a congestion zone and don’t have to remember to phone up each time.

And fourthly – the economics of it. I agree congestion charging is about reducing congestion and not about income – but not to the point of this financial consequence. The running cost and the revenue from the proposed extension are at about break even. Fair enough. However, the set up cost for the extension is estimated at £100 million. Now the Mayor is facing a budget deficit of £1billion after next year if he wants to implement

his various plans as well as maintain the current levels of transport provision. When you have no money for improvements – perhaps it is not the best time to spend £100 million that you haven’t got and which anyway could be better spent on something else.

So – hopefully – his consultation with us and the other members of the GLA family will focus his thinking a bit more strategically then it seems to be at the moment.

London Transport Users Committee

Roger Evans (Conservative member of my Transport Committee at the London Assembly, and the man who leads for me looking after the London Transport Users Committee, LTUC) and I had a meeting with LTUC today.

Unfortunately, they had presented a number of reports to the previous transport committee meeting which had run into a huge amount of flack from members.

This was the ‘sort out the way forward’ meeting. Emotions were running high – but I think we have a way forward. It isn’t a natural place for an independent voice for transport users to be placed by government legislation under the Assembly’s auspices. It is throwing up all sorts of difficulties which need sorting and which have skated along without proper rigour for the three years of the GLA to date.