LIB DEM COUNCILLOR BACKS FED-UP RESIDENTS OVER FILM CREWS

Crouch End Lib Dem Councillor Ron Aitken is backing local residents who have complained to Haringey Council about film crews using their street to park their trucks, causing noise, litter and inconvenience in Hurst Avenue and the surrounding streets.

“It seems Crouch End is a Mecca for film crews which seem to like the tolerant atmosphere and the look of local buildings,” says Cllr Aitken. “However, some of the residents are a little fed up that they always seem to park in the same street – Hurst Avenue opposite the playing fields.”

Cllr Aitken raised the issue with the BBC, who recently filmed their Inspector Linley Mysteries in the area. The BBC said that places to park were either being used by other film crews or had been booked well in advance, but they did offer to make a donation to a local charity to compensate for the inconvenience to local residents.

Nevertheless, Cllr Aitken has asked Haringey Council to try to lessen the impact of filming on local residents. In a letter to Cllr Aitken the Council says that between April 2002 and March 2003 nine film shoots took place in Crouch End, and that from March to July there were a further eight shoots.

“Perhaps Crouch End is the new Hollywood?” says Cllr Aitken. “It is nice to be popular, but I will be monitoring the impact of this issue and reporting back to residents.”

LIB DEMS WARN THAT CHILDRENS' GREEN PAPER 'COULD FAIL CHILDREN' UNLESS GOVERNMENT PROVIDES ANSWERS

As the period for consultation on the Government’s Green paper on children at risk ends on 1st December, local Liberal Democrats have warned that the Government’s own policies risk undermining the progress made since the death of Victoria Climbie. In a letter to the Liberal Democrat Shadow Minister for Children, Paul Burstow, local councillor Ron Aitken has highlighted several areas of concern:

* Budgetary pressures – the Green Paper contains no new funding proposals and Haringey has been given one of the worst budget allowances in the country. The Council’s Social Services Department is already £4m in the red. The Lib Dems favour scrapping the unfair Council Tax.

* Home Secretary David Blunkett’s proposal to take into care the children of asylum seekers whose claims are refused is described by Cllr Aitken as ‘barbaric’. Not only would it destroy families, local authorities would be faced with massive costs and would be open to legal challenge under the Children and Human Rights Acts. The Children Act specifically states that ‘the welfare of the child’ is paramount’ – how could this be ensured by taking asylum children into care?

* Rules making it compulsory for General Practitioners to inform Government Departments about asylum seekers seeking medical attention threaten to undermine a key recommendation of Lord Laming, that children should be registered with a GP and be properly examined when they are registered. These rules will deter people from registering with a GP or going to a hospital if there are concerns about abuse, driving the problem underground.

* The use of temporary accommodation and hostels, and the removal of asylum seekers’ children from mainstream schools puts them at risk of abuse and should be ended immediately.

Cllr Ron Aitken comments:

“The Government’s own policies are undermining the protection of children and these issues must be addressed. In a borough such as Haringey, with such pressing social services issues, it is vital that we get these policies right.”

MUSWELL HILL ROUNDABOUT – MEASURES DESPERATELY NEEDED AFTER UNDERTAKINGS BROKEN ON SAFETY

Haringey Council has said it will try to improve pedestrian safety at the roundabout at the top of Muswell Hill following concerns of residents and local Lib Dem councillors that a serious accident is about to happen as local people struggle to cross the road at the recently redesigned junction.

At a site visit with council officials, local Lib Dem councillor Lynne Featherstone told council staff that the addition of a third traffic lane at the top of Muswell Hill was making the crossing extremely treacherous for pedestrians. The Council agreed that a pelican crossing was needed near the top of the hill, and the traffic island should be extended.

Lynne Featherstone comments:

“Safety action needs to be taken. The situation is all the more disturbing, given that we were told before the alterations that the road at the top of the hill would be confined to two lanes and not three. Because of this, the Council should take swift action to make this very dangerous crossing much safer.”

LABOUR DISCLOSE FAILURE OF BULK RUBBISH CHARGES POLICY

Liberal Democrat councillors are calling for Haringey Council to drop its bulky rubbish charges after the Labour run Council admitted that demand for collections of bulky rubbish have declined by almost 75% since the introduction of the charges. The admission came at last week’s Council following a question from Lib Dem councillor Susan Oatway.

Lib Dems say that the fee of £15 for the bulk collection has seen demand for the service drop to one quarter of what it was prior to the introduction of the charge. The Lib Dems, who have strongly opposed the charge from the start, are concerned that around 30,000 bulky items remain uncollected or are dumped around the borough – with the Council having to pick up the bill for their collection.

The Lib Dems continue to urge the Council to reverse its stance over charges and decide whether the revenue made from charging outweighs the negative impact that the policy has had on Haringey’s environment in the form of extra fly-tipping.

Cllr Oatway (Alexandra) comments:

“The current charge means that many people can’t afford bulk collections or resent paying extra for a service they believe they already pay for through their Council taxes. As a result, fly-tipping flourishes in every part of the borough.”

Lib Dem Parliamentary spokesperson Lynne Featherstone adds:

“The Council should end the charge. It has simply added to Haringey’s problem of fly-tipping. We will continue to press the Council to swallow its pride and drop the charges.”

LIB DEMS CALL FOR LOCAL MPS TO OPPOSE TOP-UP FEES

Liberal Democrat councillors in Haringey are calling for the borough’s MPs to oppose the Government proposal for University top-up fees confirmed in the Queen’s Speech on Wednesday. They are concerned that the plans will put off many school leavers and add to the burden of student debt of those that choose to attend.

The Lib Dems have highlighted figures from a survey recently released by Barclays Bank indicating that top-up fees would lead to student debts trebling, soaring over £30,000 by 2010. They believe that the size of potential debt would deter even more school leavers from going to University.

Lib Dem leader Ross Laird is concerned about the long-term impact top up fees could have on the local economy. With fewer school leavers attending university the skill level of the workforce is likely to decline, which would have a detrimental effect on the development of Haringey’s fragile economy.

Cllr Laird will be lobbying the Council as well as both local MPs to vote against any plans for top-up fees. Ross Laird comments:

“Charging people to go to University is very short-sighted of this Labour Government. The fear of debt is deterring many bright young people from attending; top-up fees will merely compound this problem.

“Creating an education system closed to all but a privileged elite would be disastrous to the long-term development of the national and local economy. We will be strongly urging local MPs not simply to object in the media but attend any vote and register their opposition to Labour’s destructive plans.”

Being Simon Hughes

I spent the afternoon being Simon Hughes!

Not easy. Capital Transport at its AGM was holding a sort of early hustings for the Mayoral candidates – but Simon is in New York, so I was standing in for him in his absence. However, in the event, Mayor Livingstone wasn’t there (because he was hosting the London Conference), Norris wasn’t there because he won’t appear unless Ken is there (plus I think he should be hanging his Jarvis head in shame and not being seen), Nicky Gavron wasn’t there because she doesn’t know if she is the candidate for Labour or not – and doesn’t want to appear in debates until this is decided. That left me (as Simon) and Darren Johnson.

It was fun, however. Transport is one of those issues that everyone has a view on and gets everyone going. As I was representing Simon, I couldn’t tell everyone our manifesto ideas as they will be launched in due course – so I had in the initial speech to speak in general terms about where we are going on transport.

I suppose there are two main thrusts. The first is that ‘things cannot go on the way they are’ – i.e. outside of buses which are greatly improved, everything else is falling apart. We have no redress on the tube, no control over the rail and so on – and obviously what Simon would do about it.

The other thrust of the speech was about our main themes for the election. I suppose you could sum it up with: ‘think customer, think local, think environment’. But more of all of this as the campaign hots up.

The questions rained thick and fast for about another hour and a half – on bus driver behaviour, speed, pedestrians, ticketing, congestion charging, disabled exemptions, road building and so on. Time flew – and then I did too!

Stop and search

Virtually the last session of the Stop & Search scrutiny on which I am the Vice Chair.

Today we had before us ex-Commander Brian Paddick (of Lambeth cannabis fame) and Delroy Lindo – a much stopped and searched individual from Haringey.

Brian Paddick is now promoted to (sorry I forget which rank – very senior), having been dragged away from Lambeth. I thought his evidence was some of the best I have heard out of the many scrutiny sessions I have sat through – listening to quite a lot of waffle in many of them. He cut through some of the crap and gave straight answers.

The most interesting in my view was that, in answer to my question about supervision on stop and search: had top brass in the Met ever supervised what he was doing as a local commander, e.g. by checking whether or not disproportionate numbers of ethnic minorities were being stopped? He said that no senior officer had ever rung him to ask him anything about it at all. Speaks volumes in my view.

Hornsey Housing Forum

One very interested issue arose. The cleaning / rubbish contract for housing estates in Haringey is with Accord. Apparently – and I have already raised enquiries as to the accuracy of all of this – they have been penalised financially for not doing what they were contracted to do on the estates.

The point raised by the leaseholders was that if the work wasn’t done or was done poorly, and the Council levied a financial penalty, would the leaseholders get a rebate on their service charge? I have posed the question to Haringey Council and I await their response. I trust that the council policy will be to rebate in some portion – otherwise it is simply not on!

Clever road hump

I trolled off to Blackfriar’s Pub to meet Jo Weiss and Archie Galloway from the Corporation of London to look at a very special road hump – a clever and intelligent road hump.

Archie had written to me to come and look at a prototype they had in place as a pilot in the city. After a swift one at the pub, w popped off to examine the said hump. It is fab!

It allows vehicles to go over it at say 20mph (if that is what the hump is set at) and if you go over at the correct speed or lower the air filter system in the rubber hump deflates, so you go over a flat surface. However, if you are going faster, it remains rigid. Clever hump – it doesn’t really inconvenience drivers who are going at sensible speeds.

Next step for the miracle hump is a trial with buses. Very interesting afternoon.

Followed by my youngest daughter’s school play. She was stage manager – and I thought the stage management was absolutely the best bit!

Capita and congestion charging

Part 2 today of the Congestion Charging scrutiny on the Mayor’s extension and also the Assembly’s review of the original Congestion Charge scheme.

I suppose the outstanding feature of the day was the inability of Transport for London, in the form of Michelle Dix and Malcolm Murray Clarke’s, to convince us that all was well with Capita.

The Evening Standard had revealed a couple of days earlier that it had sent an undercover journalist into one of Capita’s call centres. He had found a woeful tale of failure: complaints not logged as complaints unless the caller used the actual word ‘complaint’ – otherwise it was counted as an ‘enquiry’; call centre stuff giving out wrong information was common; call centre staff hanging up when they didn’t want to continue a call; call centre staff promising that someone would ‘phone back when nobody virtually ever did, and so on.

When we put all of this to Transport for London, they simply continued to say that it was all being put right and that they were stepping up their monitoring. Oh please! I asked for a monthly report to my committee to keep an eye out on this.