Stop and search

Middle-aged, middle-class, white female – that’s me! I’m not overly happy with this profiling – particularly the middle-age bit! But on the other hand – I’ve never been stopped, let alone searched. Not the right profile I guess!

But profiling clearly does exist and appears to play a part in the decision of who the police stop when they use their discretionary powers of stop and search. The police see stop and search as a vital tool in their work to cut crime and make London safe. But are they being entirely honest when they say the decisions on who to stop are based on intelligence rather than racial profiling?

These are the issues being looked at by a panel at Metropolitan Police Authority, the body to which London’s Met police force is accountable. The investigation, for which I’m the Vice Chair, has been holding a series of public evidence-gathering sessions and also working through a wealth of written evidence. Witnesses have included the Met itself, the CRE, the Islamic Human Rights Commission, Boyhood to Manhood, Black Police Federation, young people, community reps, the Mayor’s adviser on race – and many, many others.

As we near the end of our examination, I cannot speak for the whole panel as we have not reached our conclusions yet – but I can speak for myself.

Whilst I think it is right to recognise that stop and search is an important tool in the fight against crime, I think it is also right to recognise that it can easily be abused. There is clearly is a problem and members of the ethnic communities are more likely to be stopped and searched despite the fact that there is no evidence to suggest that they are more likely to commit crimes.

At the same time the confidence of the local community is crucial to good policing, and the use of stop and search – a very visible exercise of police power – has the potential to have a big impact on how the local community sees the police. I think there is a link between the figures on lower levels of confidence in the police amongst Asian communities and the acknowledgment that Asian people are more likely to be stopped and searched.

An effective and fair use of the power is therefore also very much in the interests of the police, if post-Burnley and Bradford and post-9/11 they are to improve their relations with the Asian community.

Since 9/11 on the one hand we are more aware then ever that the police and security services rely on help from local communities, and so improving trust is crucial. On the other hand it has become more important than ever to improve the accountability of the police in stop and search given the apparent temptation post 9/11 to target Asian and other ethnic minority communities.

Right in the middle of the scrutiny came the BBC film expose ‘The Secret Policeman’ – a salutary reminder that significant racist elements remain in our police forces. We can never root them out completely, but we can ensure better education and training and better accountability. And it is vital that we ensure that there are enough safeguards over individual police officers’ behaviour so that, whatever thoughts are buried deep in someone’s mind, their behaviour remains professional and exemplary.

For me, perhaps the most telling evidence came from a question I asked at a scrutiny session last week of the ex-commander of Lambeth Police. He was saying that he monitored and supervised all the stop and search records to check that no individual officer or team of officers were acting unreasonably. When I asked him whether any of the top brass of the Met kept a check on what he or other commanders were doing in terms of supervision on stop and search, he said he had never been contacted by a senior officer in this regard. Never, ever. That spoke volumes to me!

It was also clear from the evidence that often the only experience young Asians had of the police was when they were stopped and searched. Now, if your only contact with the police is poorly executed, invasive, possibly discriminatory and offensive, you are not going to form a good impression of the police. From 31,721 searches carried out on Asians by the Met in 2002/2003 there were 3,883 arrests made. The actual conviction rate was not available because the police do not have that data – shockingly.

And it wasn’t just the relatively small number of ‘successful’ searches that counted. We heard evidence from young people about the way they were treated during a stop and how much difference it made when the exercise was carried out with respect and even more so, if it was done by a local police officer that they knew.

From the young people who came to the scrutiny I can quote you some of the evidence we heard: on the everyday reality of being a member of an ethnic community, one respondent noted that at one point he was being stopped ‘every couple of days … got used to being stopped’. On police profiling according to our witnesses, police seemed to ‘go after the black boys’ and the ‘hoodies’. Preconceived notions and stereotypes of which the police stop seemed to be based on dress, race, and ‘girls never get searched’. The behaviour and approach by the police was described by young witnesses as ‘rowdy … with no explanation of why they were doing it, they twisted my arms, searched me, handcuffed me and arrested me’. And on the impact of being stopped: ‘I cried’ said our witness.

It has been a gripping investigation to be involved with. We have already had ten evidence sessions with around forty witnesses and there is just one more to come. That will be our opportunity to question the most senior officer in charge of stop and search. And there were lots of other issues raised, including the lack of data – the Met don’t appear to know if they have reliable data on how many stops result in conviction – and the pros and cons of Recommendation 61 from the MacPherson report.

When the last session is over, we then have to try and make sense of it all and put forward recommendations to try and improve the use of stop and search – because if it goes on as it is now – the rift between community and the force that polices it will only get worse.

Road humps

I had the hump today – literally. At last, today was the day my committee held the first of two sessions on road humps which I first mooted about 18 months ago.

There certainly seems to be a real mess going on. Barnet taking them out – but virtually every other residential road it seems at times wanting them. There are good humps, bad humps, unnecessary humps and cushions and tables.

But it is undisputed that since their introduction there has been a reduction of around 60% in road deaths and serious accidents.

Weighing in in the other corner are the emergency services in the form of the police and the ambulances who both claimed that humps were slowing them down to the point where lives were equally being lost. There are also issues about noise, pollution and vibrations.

Judgment of Solomon required for this one!

What was clear from this first session is that while ‘strategic’ roads are meant to be hump free, there is a bit of a muddle about what constitutes a ‘strategic’ road. It was clear that roads which are not officially designated ‘strategic’ are actually strategic but are having humps on them. I am pretty sure we need to recommend an audit of roads, agree a hierarchy with the boroughs and a mechanism for consultation with

emergency services that is actually listened to and acted on.

The other think that is clear to me is that the ambulance service needs to look at putting its paramedics on motor bikes – they can be much quicker to arrive.

Anyway – the second session is after the Christmas break when the boroughs come to give evidence – so I don’t want to delve too deeply yet into solid recommendations. They will have to wait for the report from my enquiry.

FEATHERSTONE DELIVERS MESSAGE TO BLAIR OVER PENSION BOOKS

Cllr Lynne Featherstone went to Downing Street to deliver a petition signed by Haringey pensioners opposed to the Labour Government’s controversial plans to replace the pension book. Her action followsLabour-run Haringey Council’s backing for plans to impose new and complicated payment systems on the 8,500 pensioners in the borough who rely on receiving their pension payments at local post offices.

The Government plans to replace the pension book with three alternative methods of payment: into a normal bank or building society account, into a new basic bank account, or through a new Post Office Card Account.

Lib Dems are unhappy that the pension book has not been allowed to remain alongside the new systems, which will be complicated and difficult for many pensioners. The system will also result in a loss of trade for local post offices, many of which are under threat from Labour. Despite Labour’s claims in the Council chamber that pensioners are happy with the plans, the move is opposed by the Greater London Pensioners’ Association, which wants pensioners to have the option of keeping their pension books.

Cllr Featherstone comments:

“Abolishing the pension book is a heavy-handed tactic by the Government which will cause distress to many pensioners and accelerate post office closures across the country. Its removal is totally unjustified.”

Lib Dem pensioners spokesperson, Cllr Peter Floyd (Crouch End ward) adds:

“It is disappointing that the Labour Council did not support our motion on this issue in the Council last month. However, the Lib Dems will continue to pursue issues that matter to local pensioners, despite Labour’s opposition.”

Fireworks with the police

Fireworks today at a full session of the London Assembly. We had before us Sir John Stevens, Met Police Commissioner and Lord Toby Harris, Chair of the Metropolitan Police Authority, to answer the Assembly’s questions on policing in London.

Well – it wasn’t so much the content of the meeting that produced the fireworks, but the political row that erupted and engulfed Sir John. Interestingly enough, Sir John does reasonably often lose his rag. I am always surprised when I meet people who have reached the top of the tree and, despite all their experience, training and political nouse, can’t keep a lid on their feelings. It’s so human – I love it!

Today’s explosion resulted from a discussion during the Assembly about Mayoral policing policies of the Tories. There was clearly prior animosity between Sir John and the Tories over statements about Norris’s plans for policing in London. Clearly Sir John was not enamored of them.

Anyway – the row rumbled on a bit – when suddenly, during the meeting itself, Eric Ollerenshaw (Tory leader on the GLA) ran to us waving a bit of paper in his hand. It was a ‘press briefing’ from the Labour Group headed something like ‘Top Cop slams Tory and Lib Dem mayoral policing plans’ and went on to elaborate and totally misrepresent what Sir John had actually said during the meeting. A journalist had slipped it to him for information!

It was a really disgraceful bit of politicking by Labour. Then, there was a call to suspend standing orders to allow an emergency motion condemning the Labour Group for this tawdry and untrue piece of spin.

So we all (except Labour of course) condemned this roundly and poured shame on them. Toby Harris, Labour leader, stood up to defend himself as best he could, claiming no knowledge of the release – which to be fair had gone out when he was still in the witness chair. But he started shouting during his speech, which is always a sure sign he is on the run!

Anyway – Sir John Stevens also had a chance to put his views on record about this mischief. He said he was apolitical, he would always use the right to comment on anything which might affect operational policing AND then totally denounced the ‘press release’ from the Labour Group who had misrepresented what he had said.

It was stirring stuff! The media went into a frenzy and as he exited, I could see Sir John with camera, lights, action all around him.

There is a little twist to the end of this tale. As I came down the ramp under the chamber I saw Toby Harris locked in intense conversation in a little ante-room with two of Mayor Livingstone’s key henchmen. Methinks I see the Mayor’s hand in all of this. I am only speculating – but I probably wouldn’t lose money on a bet that the origin of the release was in the Mayor’s office, but given to Labour to be issued by the Labour Group. The wording of the release was so Ken – using extreme positions and phrasing and also attacking both the Tories and LibDems.

The LibDems had not been involved in the row in the chamber between Sir John and the Tories – but Mayor Livingstone feels very threatened by Simon Hughes (Norris being kind of out of it since taking the Jarvis shilling) and always attacks the LibDems.

With the election in June – things can only get worse!

Pension books

At 10 Downing Street by 9.30am to present a petition trying to stop the Government taking away pension books from older people. Modernisation is all very well, and change is always difficult – but there really is no need to remove pension books that older people are used to. This is an option which should remain open to pensioners.

But, of course, the other side of the Labour equation (for equation read plot) is to close all the small sub-post offices that pepper our local shopping parades.

For some elderly people, their walk to the local sub-post office with their pension book once a week is a welcome outing and opportunity to meet and talk to others. So much for social inclusion!

BUS ROUTE TRIAL TO GET GO-AHEAD WITH NEW ROUTE AVOIDING SOUTHWOOD LANE

Transport for London and the London Mayor have decided that the trial of a new bus route linking Muswell Hill, Highgate, Hampstead and Swiss Cottage will now only use roads already served by buses, and will avoid Southwood Lane.

The news comes after pressure from local residents and meetings on the issue between local councillor and London Assembly Lib Dem transport spokesperson, Lynne Featherstone, with both the Mayor and senior Transport for London officials.

Lynne Featherstone comments:

“I am delighted that the trial will go ahead and Transport for London is willing to proceed with a trial using a route that avoids Southwood Lane.

“The challenge now will be to keep up the pressure to ensure that this trial expands into a full service. There are many people in addition to schoolchildren who really need this bus route. Huge numbers of local people have worked very hard for a long time to make it a reality, and our campaign for a full service will continue.”

UPBEAT LIB DEMS CALL STROUD GREEN BY-ELECTION

The Stroud Green by election will take place on 29th January after the Liberal Democrats this week intervened to call for a vote in the Labour-held ward.

The move follows the resignation of Labour councillor Josie Irwin, who has attacked the “arrogance displayed by council officers” and the Labour-run council’s frequent failure to respond to even simple questions. She went on to say that she was “sick and tired after 13 years of having to nag and cajole council officers to get even the most basic of responses.”

The Lib Dems, who will be selecting and announcing their candidate in the next two weeks, say that local residents are fed up with the Labour council. They are increasingly turning to the Liberal Democrats as the only real challengers in the area following the party’s massive council gains last year, when they gained 12 seats. The Conservatives have no seats on Haringey Council.

In a tour of the ward last weekend, the Lib Dems say that despite its promises, the Council has not got to grips with the acute rubbish problems in the area. This week, for example, the Council has left many green waste bags littering the streets, waiting for collection.

Lib Dem Parliamentary spokesperson Cllr Lynne Featherstone comments:

“Joie Irwin’s complaints about the Council are all too common among residents. Litter and dumping is a problem and we have been working hard in recent months to secure clean ups at the train stations that serve the ward.

“Local people have also been raising their concerns about Iraq, which is playing a strong part in disillusionment with Labour, both locally and nationally. Labour will be under severe pressure in this election.”

WOOD GREEN – FEATHERSTONE SECURES SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS TO WESTBURY ROAD

Residents living in Westbury Avenue, N22 will be able to cross the road safely thanks to pressure from Lib Dem councillor Lynne Featherstone. The section of the busy Wood Green road at the parade of shops already has a speed hump and a crossing, but due to overgrown trees and poor signage, many drivers were failing to stop for pedestrians.

Cllr Featherstone contacted the Council after she was alerted to the problem by a local resident who was concerned about the possibility of a serious accident on the crossing. The large trees on the road have now been pruned to prevent them obscuring the current signs. In addition, the Council will be installing new signs this week for both approaches.

Cllr Featherstone comments:

“I am delighted that we have been able to secure some safety improvements to this busy road. Road safety is an absolute priority and we will continue to work with local residents to bring their concerns to the attention of the Council.”

DISMAY OVER POST OFFICE CLOSURE PLAN FOR TRIANGLE

Liberal Democrats have condemned another ‘stealth closure’ by the Post Office of a much valued Haringey branch, and have accused the Post Office of keeping the area in the dark over their closure plans. The Post Office has announced its intention to close its branch in Crescent Road, N22, giving local residents only a short time to organise their opposition to the plans.

Local councillors Wayne Hoban and David Beacham (Alexandra Ward) joined Lynne Featherstone and local residents at the weekend to protest about the closure. The loss of the Crescent Road post office, the third in the west of Haringey to face the axe, will mean a long walk for pensioners to the nearest branch. Lib Dems also say the closure will hurt the other shops in this small but vital shopping parade.

The party has also condemned the Post Office for failing to notify them of the plans, despite requests from Councillor Featherstone that the post office should notify her of all closure plans in the area.

Local councillor Wayne Hoban comments:

“This closure is very bad news for residents and for the shopping area around Crescent Road and the Triangle. The Post Office must think again about its plans.”

Lynne Featherstone adds:

“This third planned Post Office closure in the west of the borough is appalling. All our worst fears about the future of the local branch network appear to be materialising, and I am dismayed by what is a grossly flawed consultation process.”

CALL FOR ACTION OVER JUNCTION AT BOTTOM OF MUSWELL HILL

Muswell Hill councillor Lynne Featherstone has called for action to be taken to improve one the most hazardous and complicated road junctions in the borough. Her calls come following a site visit with Council officers to highlight many of the safety concerns local residents have with the hazardous junction at the bottom of Muswell Hill, which joins the hill with Priory Road, Park Road and Alexandra Palace Way.

Cllr Featherstone has been in contact with many residents who are concerned with the danger to drivers and pedestrians alike due the confusing design and poor sight lines. Council officials acknowledge that if they could start again it would not be designed in its present form.

However, Council Featherstone is pressing the Council for a clear plan for how they intend to increase safety at the junction. The Council has suggested constructing bollards in parts to stop vehicles parking on the junction as well as protecting pedestrians from cars mounting the pavement. Replanting shrubs and trees to improve sight lines was also a suggestion put forward but Cllr Featherstone is pressing for more substantial changes.

Lynne Featherstone comments:

“This dangerous junction needs a root and branch sorting out. Haringey must get to grips with it so that traffic and pedestrians are clear who has right of way. Oncoming traffic is a danger at the junction and we must protect pedestrians – both on the pavements where they are narrow and crossing where they can’t always be seen.”