LIB DEMS URGE COUNCIL TO IMPROVE CYCLE LANES

Local Lib Dem Cllr Bob Hare is calling for improvements to cycle lanesaround Haringey. At Thursday’s Muswell Hill and Highgate Area Assembly, Haringey Council put forward their plans for cycle lane provision.

Cllr Hare welcomedthe attention being given to this subject and asked for further improvementsto be made to the plans.

The presentation on plans to improve and create cycle lanes started adetailed discussion with local residents, with many current problemshighlighted. These include cycle lanes which stop abruptly when they areneeded most – where roads become narrow and at junctions. One localresident, currently at university in Sheffield, explained that the councilthere had adopted a policy of pavement sharing between cyclists andpedestrians which had been extremely successful.

Cllr Hare, Lib Dem Environment Spokesperson and a keen cyclist, asked thatcycle ‘cut-throughs’ be provided at kerb build-outs. These build-outs areinstalled to improve pedestrian safety, but without cut-throughs they createserious dangers for cyclists who get squeezed between the build-out andpassing traffic.

“Haringey still has a long way to go before we will have a usable network ofroutes that might be used by, say, a twelve old,” said Cllr Hare.

“Nevertheless, there has been a useful discussion and a number of issues andconcerns affecting cyclists were raised with the Council, which I hope theywill take on board for their plans.

“I urge Haringey Council to install ‘cut-throughs’ for bikes at points wherekerbs have been built out to protect pedestrians,” Cllr Hare said.

“This will help improve cycle safety and convenience across the Borough andencourage more people towards environmentally friendly travel.”

LIB DEMS URGE RESIDENTS TO MAKE THE MOST OF COUNCIL'S LIMITED DONATION

Liberal Democrats are encouraging local residents to bring forward ideas onhow best to best to spend the £50,000 given to each of Haringey’s AreaAssemblies by Haringey Council to tackle small local projects and repairs.

However, while welcoming the scheme they expressed concerns at the fairnessof the allocation of funds.

The decision to distribute the £50,000 to each Area Assembly was met withstrong criticism by Lib Dems earlier this year, as residents in the west ofthe borough were left short changed.

The Muswell Hill assembly received thesame funding as other assemblies, despite being twice as large as some. TheLib Dems had suggested that money should be allocated proportionallyaccording to the size of the areas.

Instead Harningey Council pressed on with itsplans which have resulted in some small, two-ward Area Assemblies receivingthe same amount of money as a large Area Assembly such as Muswell Hill, which covers four wards.

However Lib Dems and residents are determined to make the most of the money.Suggestions last night were made for projects including extra streetlighting, litter bins and support for local voluntary projects such asgardening help or home security measures for elderly residents.

Lib Dem leader and Highgate Councillor, Neil Williams welcomed theresidents’ ideas despite the disappointing funding, but said it wasimportant that the projects do not duplicate the things that the Councilshould be providing as a matter of course.

Cllr Neil Williams comments:

“It certainly appears to residents that the Labour Council has playedpolitics with the distribution of money for this scheme, but we aredetermined to make the most of it.

“We will no doubt have good ideas from residents for small localimprovements.

“However, it isimportant is that we ensure that the money is not spent onsimply making good existing inadequacies in council services.”

Planning issues

Have invited local neighbours in to discuss a planning application next to me in our road. It will be a nail in the coffin of the lovely Grove atmosphere of the road – but I doubt whether we will prevail. Everyone is against it – although the proposal is better than we might get from a commercial developer as it is supposedly by a local man wanting a small house for his daughter. Doubt is expressed by some of my neighbours who know this chap about the veracity of this being the case. Others say it may well be. We will do what we can. For me – if it were built as described and never expanded – it might be better the devil we know. But you can’t get guarantees – and Haringey don’t have a stunning reputation for enforcement or supervision – let alone protecting areas in Highgate. For me personally it will be horrible and invade my privacy with windows looking into my living spaces.

Heaven knows I have helped residents across the whole borough fight inappropriate planning applications – but it is very difficult for me. If it goes to committee – as it is a Labour controlled committee and despite it being required to act as a quasi judicial body – the sight of me would probably be enough to ensure they simply voted it through. The temptation would almost certainly be too strong for them to resist.

We will see.

West London Tram rally

Address huge rally on Haven Green in Ealing ‘Against the West London tram’. Ken’s proposal for this tram will cost £648 million and will displace 27,000 cars into local residential roads as they close off various bits of the Uxbridge Road. Trams are great – but this is the wrong place to force this through.

I arrive early (by car – yes even I occasionally use my car) and am sitting parked outside a house near the Green where a man is trimming his hedge. Very Saturday morning………. I realise that I need the loo and that I will never last the 2 hours of the rally without going. Can I ask a stranger to use his loo? I decide I have no choice, explain that I am about to give a speech at the rally down the road and am a London Assembly member and can offer identification. He says yes of course – but does add that it is conditional that I am giving a speech against the tram as he and his family will be there to demonstrate against. Happily, I am therefore allowed to relieve myself!

It was an outdoor rally, with shaky podium and microphone and strong wind. As Chair of Transport I get a five minute slot and did my best to support the local people who are really going to be screwed by Ken’s proposals – and for that matter the consultation which is just starting, but which questions are, as ever, designed to get answers on detail rather than ask people what they feel about the whole scheme.

Fantastic crowd – with a good MC and a poet who started the whole shebang off with a fiery poem against the tram. Speaker after speaker gave their own personal reasons why this was an untenable proposal. Banners were waved, TV cameras rolled – and then it was home for the Women’s Final for me.

Stop and Search

All hell broke loose amongst the media when they discovered that stops of people of Asian origin under Section 44 of the Terrorism Act had rocketed by 302%. I am the spokesperson for the Metropolitan Police Authority on this issue as I was Vice Chair of the scrutiny investigation on Stop & Search. I field media enquiries and interviews, juggling with school open day and Shrek 2. No one ever said it would be easy!

Muswell Hill Assembly

Third meeting of day with same officer – not really – he was doing a ‘surgery’ before the start of the Muswell Hill Assembly meeting. Nothing much of interest at the meeting -not that stuff wasn’t important – it just wasn’t interestingly presented. I stayed for the bicycle and the UDP update presentation – but then left to do work at home.

Magic Road Humps

Second meeting of the day with very same officer. However, this has been set up by me following my hump scrutiny and discovery of the ‘magic’ hump. That is a road hump that if set to 20mph goes flat (deflates) instantly if you are driving at 20mph or lower but remains a hump if you are speeding. Clever!. The inventors approached me to say they were looking for a borough to trial the hump in. I had a meeting with the Labour Exec Haringey member and negotiated for Haringey to be the first borough to do this.

Thus – this meeting. However, after the presentation, it transpired that it might not be absolutely ‘free’. It would be heavily subsidised – but not free. I didn’t think that was good enough – this is early days for this invention and unless and until they trial it properly in a borough along a couple of roads – they won’t get buyers. However, if they do trial it properly – they could clean up. The inventor was instructed to go and negotiate further with his MD and come back with a better offer – so watch this space.

Creighton Road Mini Roundabout

Meet Haringey traffic officer at the Creighton Road roundabout junction with Coppetts Road. It’s a nasty, fast flowing, heavy volume mini roundabout – where traffic shoots into the flow without looking and which Fortismere and Coldfall children have to negotiate to cross to school in all directions. Nightmare.

Unfortunately, the Safe Routes to School money for the area is only £50,000 and won’t pay for a proper junction with green phase pedestrian lights – and anyway the knock on from lights might stuff up the whole area. Whilst lots of parents would say so what and they don’t care – you can’t just ignore traffic consequences of any proposed measures. Some of the parents from Coldfall are there and the lighting officer. We all agree on new and better lighting so at least the motorists in winter have a flying chance of actually seeing the children. The traffic officer is mandated to go away and come back with proposals for what we can do with the money available.

HORNSEY – LIB DEM CONCERNS OVER CEMENT PLANT PLAN

Local Lib Dem councillors in Stroud Green and Crouch End have expressedtheir opposition to a controversial application to build a cement batchingplant at the Cranford Way Industrial Estate in Hornsey. The Lib Dems saythat the estate, surrounded by residential streets, is in no way a suitablelocation for such a heavy industrial activity.

Cllr Laura Edge (Stroud Green) and Cllr David Winskill (Crouch End) say thatfor three decades, local residents living near Cranford Way have coexistedhappily with the light-industrial businesses that operate from the site.Most firms located at Cranford Way are engaged in distribution andwarehousing activities, and have caused few environmental or neighbourhooddifficulties in the area.

Local councillor Laura Edge comments:

“The prospect of a cement plant on thesite is causing great concern to local people. To introduce such a heavyindustrial process involving noise, dust, hazardous substances andheavy-duty freight traffic to our local roads would be in no one’s interest.

“I am also concerned that Haringey Council has not done enough to inform localresidents of the planning application, with many local streets notinformed.”

Cllr David Winskill adds:

“This site is not a suitable place from which toestablish a distribution network for cement. We will be asking thedevelopers to think again about the application, and withdraw it, otherwiseit will be vigorously opposed in the area.”