OPEN VERDICT ON DEATH OF ROGER SUTHERLAND

Lib Dem social services spokesperson, Ron Aitken today welcomed the coroner’s report into the death of Roger Sutherland in February this year after being released by the Whittington Hospital.

An open verdict was given at the inquest at St Pancras Coroners’ Court. However the coroner chose to use his powers, under rule 43 of the coroners’ rules, to write to the Whittington Hospital Trust and other health services involved in Roger Sutherland’s care and draw their attention to issues involving psychiatric liaison between Accident & Emergency, mental health teams and GPs.

Roger died after setting fire to his flat hours after being released by the Whittington Hospital. In the last few months leading up to the tragedy, Roger’s family had turned to Councillor Ron Aitken for advice. He says that on six or seven occasions Roger’s condition was made known to Ambulance drivers, his GP and the Whittington Hospital.

Cllr Ron Aitken comments:

“The death of Roger was a tragedy and our sympathy goes to the family. I am pleased that the coroner is writing to all involved and hope that some positive changes come out this.”

The answer to London's bus problems?

Very bizarre experience. I had a meeting arranged with a woman who had emailed me. She had discovered, she said, the solution to all the problems of London’s buses. She had been unable to get through to the Mayor or Peter Hendy (Director of Surface Transport, Transport for London) – so asked if I would see her and perhaps support her ideas.

I get a fair number of contacts from people who say they have a great transport idea which they can’t get people interested in. I try to see people whenever possible – but they usually give me an idea of their idea – so to speak. She wouldn’t. It was a secret.

She had said that she was wary of telling anyone her idea in case they ‘stole’ it and she wanted to own the commercial rights to her idea. In the end I agreed to a meeting and she came into City Hall to my office.

When we met, the first thing she said was that she had brought along a ‘non-disclosure agreement’ for me to sign. Whilst I am perfectly happy to keep a confidence if someone in that situation wants to be assured that I won’t pass on an idea – I certainly don’t believe in elected politicians signing anything that might prevent openness and accountability.

She said that she couldn’t tell me her idea without my signing this document. I said that I was sorry that it would seem, therefore, to be a wasted journey on her part. I had been quite clear about this before the meeting was arranged.

It was all quite pleasant and well-behaved – but certainly bizarre. I explained to her that she really did need to see Peter Hendy or Livingstone if she wanted to ‘sell’ her idea to them and wished her well.

Of course, I am still curious about what the idea is!

Development in Hornsey

Rush back to Haringey for the hearing into an appeal over a controversial backlands development in Hornsey. The developers are appealing over the rejection of their plans. In my view, their plans are a dreadful proposal, which would stuff huge houses on a bit of land that falls between the back gardens of a triangle of houses.

The permission was refused – but as ever – developers don’t give up – so the appeal was this morning.

I’ve got a busy diary today so Benji – one of the key organisers of the protesters, kindly says he will try and get me in early so I can give my evidence.

I had been to Mayor Livingstone on this and got his agreement that this was the type of development which he doesn’t approve of as it doesn’t provide affordable housing nor is the sort of sustainable development which we need.

But it looks like a no-show all round with neither the Planning Inspector nor council officers turning up on time. I hang around for a fair while, but with no sight of them – have to make my move to next meeting. Think the inspector was ill in the end – though would have been good if information had got to everyone waiting sooner!

West London Tram update

The GLA Transport Committee’s meeting about the West London Tram commences and I welcome the groups – some from Southall, Acton, Ealing, Shepherds Bush as well as some general contributors from organisations like GLAD, Transport for All and the London Civic Forum.

Have to say it was one of the most fascinating meetings I have chaired. The groups were there to inform the members of the committee of their concerns so that when we sit in formal committee on 16th September, we will be able to question Transport for London who are coming before us and put to them all the key issues raised.

I gave each speaker five minutes and then the committee asked that person questions. The really key issue is fears from residents about traffic displacement if a new tram gets the go ahead.

In the case of the original Central London congestion charge – Transport for London’s traffic forecasts only showed a very small percentage increase in traffic in the areas surrounding the charging zone. There was a lot of scepticism at the time – even some scare stories that the world as we know it would end in gridlock on 17th February 2002. But, once Congestion Charging started, it turned out that TfL’s model was right.

For the tram, TfL’s models show that where the tram displaces traffic, it could result in increases of traffic of up to 25% in places – so this time the fears of residents may well be right. Even if there is an overall reduction in traffic caused by the tram (which would be good), this level of displacement could cause really serious problems in those areas.

Obviously we will look at the modelling and there will undoubtedly be robust questioning on this issue. But what the 25% increase – if it happens – really means. An increase from one car an hour on average down a road to one and a quarter would mean fears are misplaced. But an increase from a much higher level could cause real problems of bottle-necks, stationary traffic etc.

Clarification on this is absolutely vital, but the information we’ve had so far isn’t clear. Something to pursue in our questioning!

There are also big issues over how the consultation has been carried out, how the tram would integrate with other forms of transport and the impact in particular areas; e.g. the plans currently would involve the closure Acton High Street.

Later this week we are going to examine the Croydon tram and walk/ride the proposed route – from Shepherds Bush right along to Uxbridge.

West London Tram

I am chairing a meeting tonight – an informal meeting of the Transport Committee. We are hearing from numerous groups representing a range of views on the Mayor’s proposals for the West London Tram (WLT). This is causing huge controversy in West London and the Transport Committee is trying to ensure that all the concerns are heard and addressed by Transport for London who are consulting on the proposed routes.

Back in the office

Back in the office. Having spent the previous four days answering holiday mail and emails from my home address – log on with dread. Spend the day responding to any outstanding correspondence and attempting to reduce size of inbox.

FRUSTRATION IN STROUD GREEN AS SQUATTERS MOVE IN AGAIN

Stroud Green councillor Laura Edge has sharply criticised Haringey Council for once again allowing a council-owned property in her ward to become occupied by squatters. The move follows criticism from Councillor Edge in June about the failure of Haringey Council to recover a number of squatted properties in Perth Road N4.

Haringey had allowed one of two social housing properties in Perth Road to become occupied once again, shortly after they had finally evicted a previous set of squatters from the other property. The properties had become empty and were boarded up in late July, but Councillor Edge says this must have been inadequately done, because a new set of squatters moved into one of the properties again last week.

Cllr Laura Edge comments:

“It is extremely frustrating, as this means we are back to square one in trying to sort out this problem. Squatters will always take advantage of empty buildings if Haringey Council does not move to secure them properly, repair them, and ensure that they are swiftly occupied. Given the demand for social housing in the borough, this is unacceptable and is also a blight for nearby residents.”

HIGHGATE MYSTERY OVER VANISHING LETTERBOX

Mystery surrounds the disappearance of a Royal Mail letterbox in Highgate, with local councillors urging the company to take action to find it.

Concerned residents living near the Archway Road alerted Highgate’s Lib Dem councillors last week of the removal of the letterbox outside the former Archway Road post office – controversially closed last year as part of the Post Office’s closure programme in the area. Residents had complained at the removal, saying that the nearest alternative letterbox, on Langdon Park Road N6, has a slot that is large enough to take only the smallest packages.

However, the Royal Mail has told the Lib Dems that it did not authorise the removal of the box, and its disappearance is a mystery. The company has been in touch with the contractors currently working on the major gas mains project in the Archway Road to see if they were responsible for taking it away – a move that the Mail says it did not authorise.

Neil Williams, Lib Dem Leader and Highgate Councillor, comments:

“I am pleased that the Royal Mail has moved swiftly to investigate the disappearance of one of our local letterboxes, as it must be put back in place immediately. I don’t remember a case of a red box having gone walkabout before. It is bad enough that local resident have lost the post office on the Archway Road, so I will be watching to ensure it is back in place as soon as possible.”

LIB DEMS URGE COUNCIL TO TAKE INNOVATIVE APPROACH OVER FLYPOSTED PHONE BOX

Local Liberal Democrat councillors Matt Davies and Lynne Featherstone are calling for action on a flyposting eyesore in Muswell Hill.

The disused orange phone kiosk on Fortis Green Road (near the Odeon Cinema) is a target for flyposters and an unwelcome blot on the area. With no-one willing to take responsibility for the kiosk, it is the perfect place for unwanted advertising and posters.

Islington Council has taken steps to smarten up similar boxes in their borough by covering the boxes with a wooden trellis and placing growing plants around them, as well as installing flower boxes around the base. The local Lib Dems in Muswell Hill have asked Haringey to consider taking the same innovative approach.

“We have asked Haringey Council to remove the latest flyposting which has been there for weeks,” explains Cllr Davies (Lib Dem, Fortis Green). “It is sad that Muswell Hill is being spoilt by this eyesore. I am aware that there are complications with the company who owns this phone box, but I am urging Haringey Council to do all it can to either bring the box back into use or remove it completely.”

Cllr Lynne Featherstone (Lib Dem, Muswell Hill) adds: “In the meantime, we would like to see if Haringey can take a novel approach to the problem and turn it into an opportunity. Whatever the long-term future of this box, Haringey Council must ensure that illegal flyposting is not tolerated.”

HARINGEY URGED TO JOIN FORCE TO TACKLE RADIO PIRATES

Haringey Liberal Democrats Leader Neil Williams has welcomed moves by a group of North London councils to tackle the problem or radio piracy in the area. However, he says that he is disappointed that Haringey Council is not yet participating in the group and is urging Haringey Council to join forces with neighbouring boroughs to help tackle the problem of illegal radio broadcasts.

The new group, the London Pirate Radio Enforcement Practitioners Group, met for the first time last week and includes representatives from Hackney, Newham, Tower Hamlets and Barking Councils.

Cllr Williams says the problem of pirates radio stations is a serious one, particularly in hilly Highgate where illegal operators attach aerials to blocks of flats in the area. As well as blocking the airwaves, the pirates can instill fear among residents from the sounds of the people installing them at night. Lib Dem councillors in Highgate have previously called on the Council act quickly to remove aerials on council properties, as pirates will soon get tired losing their aerial and broadcasting equipment if faced with a determined local council.

Cllr Neil Williams comments:

“Haringey Council needs to work with other councils to tackle this problem, as pirates will often move their aerials from one location to another. There is too great a tendency to see pirate operators as heroic pioneers, when in reality this is a social menace which is a nuisance to residents and can interfere with legitimate broadcasters, police and emergency service frequencies.

Lib Dem Parliamentary spokesperson Lynne Featherstone adds:

“I welcome this initiative, and we are asking Haringey to ensure they get involved in the new group as soon as possible. Telecoms regulators and radio stations are on their own not able to get to grips with the problem of piracy, and it is only with boroughs working together and sharing information on pirates that they can be controlled.”