FINSBURY PARK -LIB DEMS WELCOME ASSURANCE OVER CONSULTATION

Stroud Green Councillor Laura Edge has welcomed assurances from Haringey Council’s Parks Department that it will consult on the future use of Finsbury Park for large scale commercial concerts.

The assurance came at a meeting of Haringey Council’s General Purposes Committee on Tuesday 7 June to approve a licence for the Mean Fiddler’s Big Gay Out which will take place in the park on Saturday 23 July.

The Mean Fiddler has had contracts with Haringey Parks Department to stage large scale commercial concerts and other events in the Park since the earlier 1990s. Over the years the events have caused many problems in relation to litter, noise and damage. In addition, they result in a large portion of the Park being sealed off to local users for days either side of the events.

The management of individual events has improved in response to years of pressure from residents, park users and local Lib Dem councillors. However, residents, park users and other stakeholders remain angry that they have not had the opportunity to debate whether the Park should be used for such large-scale commercial events in the first place, and, if so, on what terms.

Concern about the use of the Park for such events has also led to fears it will undermine the improvements currently being made to the Park under a grant from the Heritage Lottery Fund.

Lib Dem Cllr Laura Edge (Stroud Green) comments:

“I am pleased to hear that the Council intends to consult on the use of Finsbury Park for large-scale commercial concerts. For too long the Park has been treated as a cash cow for the rest of the Parks Service rather than the vital community asset that it is.”

In a further development at the meeting, the managing director of the Mean Fiddler, Melvin Benn, agreed to look at the possibility of restricting the closure of the Richard Hope Play Space, commonly known as the Pit, to one day on the day of the event itself.

Laura Edge adds:

“The Pit is a fantastic play-space which brings hours of enjoyment to local children. Every year there is great disappointment when it is closed to make way for the concerts. If the Mean Fiddler can restrict the closure to one day it would be very welcome, provided of course that the space is fully cleaned up afterwards.”

First days at school

Slouching at the Despatch Box is the name of the game!

The ‘Despatch Box’ is the box (placed on a desk) at which the Labour and Conservative frontbenches stand in Parliament when speaking. The objective appears to be to demonstrate a macho nonchalance (regardless of gender) and an ‘I am soooooooo relaxed – hey – I don’t even need to stand up straight to deliver my speech which I am pretending is off the cuff – but which is actually written out in front of me’ sort of demeanour. You can smell the testosterone.

The ace sloucher during the Home Affairs debate on the Queens’ Speech was David Davies.

I know! I know! I have only been here for two minutes and I am getting above myself even daring to comment on my elders and betters – or in the case of the two new Tory frontbench boys in short trousers – my youngers and betters. But leadership is in the air of the corridors of power around which I am now wandering – mostly lost – as the maze that is the Palace of Westminster refuses to swim into a logical geographic order in my mind.

I cast my first vote last week. There is this whole performance with the ‘ayes’ going through one lobby to vote and the ‘noes’ the other. Now – to a new girl this is very confusing even though they operate a one-way system. I am sure within a week or two, just like having to bow/nod as you enter and leave the chamber, it will be as if I had done it all my life.

However, I am mildly concerned that I will accidentally wander through the wrong lobby and so vote the wrong way. Whilst worrying, I find myself next to my new best friend Boris.Boris ‘I dare you to mess up my hair’ Johnson and I were on the first Question Time after the election – and I bonded with him (possibly unbeknown to him). Or more accurately – I was grateful that he was so funny he made me laugh and relax.

I asked Boris if the lobby I was heading for was the right one? Boris didn’t seem to know. I pointed out that he had actually been here for some time. He charmingly meandered on through and I followed him – happily finding some of my own kind in the lobby thus indicating I had gone the right way! Phew!

The leadership contests pervade the Westminster air. The Tories are at it. And Labour are at it too. The Lib Dems are a bit left out being happy with their own leader! Little enclaves and whispers – don’t you just love it?

The really interesting situation is Labour. When will Tony go? You can’t tell by looking at him (and yes – it is funny the first time you see these guys for real a few metres away). The current (and laudable) contest between Tony and Gordon as to who can do more for Africa shows their rivalry in all its glory.

I don’t think we really know yet what Gordon Brown would be like as Prime Minister. He’s had this strange (or is that convenient?) tendency to go all quiet and slip into the background when the going’s got tough on many issues. Indeed, when he briefly sticks his head over the parapet – such as to back Blair’s line on Iraq during the general election – it suddenly becomes big political news. Yet at other times, he and the Treasury are all over the details of everyone else’s department. As Prime Minister he can hardly carry on going AWOL when inconvenient big issues strike – but what would he really be like under pressure, on the spot with nowhere to hide?

See – how seductive it all is? I must not be sucked in. I must not be sucked in. I must not be …

Prime Minister's Questions

I missed the first Prime Minister’s Questions as I had to attend Mayor’s Question Time at City Hall a couple of weeks ago – but today I am in situ and waiting for this contest. Tony gets himself into all sorts of trouble over the EU Constitution mess we are in. I think it is probably a very good lesson for politicians not to forget that the people in the end have a way of expressing themselves and whilst I am for a new constitution – I think it is quite good to get a kick up the backside and have to re-examine both guiding principles and practicality of implementation and consequences.

Interesting to me (trying to learn procedure so that I can join in) that in these questions – there is no notification on the Order Paper as to what the question will be and the chosen ones get to ask the Prime Minister the actual question – but don’t have a supplementary (unless they are the Leader of the Official Opposition etc). Mere mortals – just get the one go – which in the end means the Prime Minister generally wins. Thus democracy is always stacked in favour of the chosen ones.

Violent Crime Bill

The Violent Crime Bill is published today. I am the Lib Dem spokesperson on this in the Commons and will be taking it through the committee stage.

The bill is to bring in measures to address the rising problems around replica guns, the age at which you can buy a knife and binge-drinking. All very real problems – so Lib Dems are broadly in favour of the measures – with some heavy provisos around the detail, which I guess are where our amendments will be as we go through the legislation.

A while back, as a member of the Metropolitan Police Authority (MPA), I went to visit the Met’s firearms division SO19 to see what armed officers do, learn about their training and see what they have to confront. There is now this amazing video / computer technology that puts you in a crime situation – and you see something happen, maybe a gun turn on you, and in a split second have to decide what action to take. Then it flashes up on the screen whether you were right to shoot or wrong – or indeed whether you are dead. Salutary experience for me. I couldn’t do it. I couldn’t get it right one hundred percent of the time. And I certainly couldn’t tell the difference between a replica gun and a real one.

Moreover, I went into the arms room where they have dozens of guns and their replicas – side by side in pairs – from revolvers to rifles. These are not some near approximation for the real thing. These replicas are indistinguishable from the real thing.

So – I am supportive of banning such replicas – so long as the law isn’t an ass. What I mean is that it has to be enforceable at the same time as not interfering with the harmless – such as props for plays. Let’s hope the legislation can cope with drawing this distinction in a workable manner.

On the age being raised to 18 to buy a knife – I think the government will get itself in a tangle. There is a great debate to be had about the age of majority. What can and should one be allowed to do at 16, 17 or 18? However, the notion that a couple can marry and have children at 16 but not buy a knife may well be in danger of being the wrong solution to a very real problem.

I regard knife crime as seriously as I regard gun crime and do not understand why knife crime carries lesser sentences. That is an area I would like to see tackled alongside a wide debate about the age of majority.

And then there is binge-drinking. Perhaps the government needs to pause before going ahead with 24 hour lifestyles. In the end – it is probably right – but there are clearly a number of drawbacks that need attention before that goes ahead.

But the real point about all of the above – they may go some way to satisfying the ‘tough on crime’ but they don’t even begin to touch on being ‘tough on the causes of crime’. What is it in our society that makes young men aspire to criminality as a way of gaining status with their peers? Why does carrying a knife mean more than doing well at school? Why do young people want to drink themselves into oblivion on a Friday night?

A change in culture is the hardest thing to achieve – because it takes massive effort at all levels for a long time. Sometimes laws can deliver – drink driving and wearing seatbelts are examples. But there was so much more than legislation to them. There was a real underlying resource poured into campaigning and advertising – and that is what shifted the culture when combined with enforcement.

So tough laws can deliver – but not if they are only there for appearance sake.

How to ask questions in Parliament

Crack of dawn birthday celebrations on Tuesday for my youngest daughter – 16 today – and a GCSE exam too. So not fair! And I won’t be home until after 10pm as a vote is expected in Parliament then.

At the Commons I go into the chamber for the day’s questions. Today is questions to the Minister for Scotland. Clearly this is not a subject close to the heart of my constituency – but I am trying to see how you get to speak or ask a question.

The apparently random bobbing up and down by members in the Chamber seems to bear no or little relationship to getting called. Actually, that’s not quite true – you do have to stand to indicate you wish to be called and to be called – but that can mean that if a debate starts at 3.30pm you have to stand up after every speech right to the end of the debate (which can be around 9.30pm) – and you still may not get called.

But questions are different. You are notified if one of your oral questions is accepted and it is put on the Order Paper – in order! The Speaker calls your name and you stand up and say ‘Question 3 Mr Speaker’. The Minister then answers and then you are allowed one supplementary – but then others can bob up and down on your question and Mr Speaker may call them. How or why Mr Speaker chooses a supplicant – at this point I have no idea.

We are informed that although we were supposed to stay until 10pm for a vote – this is not going to happen now. So I go to the Press Gallery reception for new MPs and chat up the media. Clearly a good idea as when I rise on Wednesday morning there is a message left at around 6.30am to call Sky news about the Violent Crime Bill.

LIB DEMS WELCOME ESTABLISHMENT OF ACTION GROUP TO COMBAT WOOD GREEN 'OVERBUILDING'

Hornsey and Wood Green MP Lynne Featherstone and Lib Dem planning spokesperson Cllr Jonathan Bloch have welcomed the establishment of a new residents’ action group to fight the over-development of Wood Green.

The Watsons Road Action Group (WRAG) was formed last month following a special meeting of the Avenue Gardens Residents’ Association, attended by fifty residents, to discuss proposals to build 97 homes on the Watsons Road site – the latest of six major recent developments or proposals in the area.

The Lib Dems, who over the last few years have consistently campaigned against overdevelopment in Haringey, share the concerns of WRAG who feel that the proposals are too intensive and the multi-story architecture is out of keeping with its surroundings.

Ms Featherstone will be calling for an inquiry into the future of developments in Wood Green. She, along with Cllr Bloch and WRAG, feels that the local impact on traffic and transport, school places and healthcare of this planning proposal, along with four similar ones around the centre of Wood Green, needs to be properly considered.She has also called for more time over the controversial planning application in Lordship Lane after Haringey Council failed to provide all the relevant documents to local residents and campaigners about the plans. This is despite a council commitment that documents would be provided in time to allow residents to fully consider them and respond.Ms Featherstone says that no planning application should be considered ‘in play’ until all the relevant documents are available to the public – which they were not on this occasion.

Lynne Featherstone MP comments:

“There are now so many housing developments in Wood Green, either just completed, proposed or on the horizon, that Haringey as a borough needs to step back and take stock. Simply cramming in more blocks of flats, one by one, to meet Mayor Ken’s targets without considering the wider implications, is not the answer.”

Cllr Jonathan Bloch adds:

“Local groups such as RATT (Residents Against Twin Towers), WRAG (Watsons Road Action Group) and AGRA (the Avenue Gardens Residents Association) are rightly bringing this creeping overdevelopment in Wood Green to everyone’s attention.

“It is up to Haringey Council to subject all proposals to the most rigorous examination. There must be no room for second-rate developments in Haringey.”

UDP INQUIRY – WELCOME FOR SECOND LOOK OVER GREEN SPACES

The Liberal Democrats have welcomed an agreement at the inquiry into Haringey’s UDP (Unitary Development Plan) that a revised map will be considered over the proximity of residents to green space in the borough. Lib Dem Environment Spokesperson, Bob Hare, who raised the issue a the inquiry last Thursday, says that the Council’s present definition of proximity to green space is selling residents short and could contribute significantly to future overdevelopment in the area.

The complex but vital issue centres round Haringey’s open space deficiency map, and how Haringey Council defines the benefit of nearby open space for residents. At present Haringey says that residents living within 400 metres of a green space enjoy such amenity. This means that those proposing development nearby might not have to provide much greenery with any new buildings. However, Haringey uses this definition for even the smallest of green pockets, even where the green spaces in question could not be regarded as green open land being enjoyed by residents.

The planning inspector agreed to accept as evidence a new map from Cllr Hare, which will give a much more realistic definition of residents’ proximity to green space – treating large spaces such as the Alexandra Palace Park differently from a small pocket park on a street corner.

Cllr Bob Hare comments:

“This is far more than a technical issue. How the Council defines existing green spaces will have an enormous impact over the years on what green spaces are preserved or created elsewhere in the borough.

“At present, Haringey is being far too generous towards development in its current definition of what is enough open space. This will only fuel suspicions that Haringey Council is too soft on the potential for overdevelopment in the area.

“A wide definition of proximity to green space will let the Council off the hook when it considers the issue in other proposed developments. If this issue is not resolved, it could have far reaching consequences for local residents for many years. I welcome the inspector’s call for more evidence on the issue and we will continue to pursue this at UDP inquiry.”

WOOD GREEN FLOOD – ACTION NEEDED NOW TO CLEAR DRAINS

Lib Dem councillors have called for an investigation into the clearing of drains in the borough following the flooding of Wood Green’s shopping centre last Friday afternoon. Cllr Bob Hare, who speaks for the party on environment issues, says that Haringey Council needs to seek immediate assurances from Thames Water that adequate systems are in place to prevent such floods in the future.

Cllr Hare says that following the torrential downpour last Friday afternoon, Wood Green’s Safeway arcade was flooded out. Further down the High Road, passengers who were taking buses outside Marks and Spencer had to wade through water to climb on board. Drains backing up spewed filthy water on to the streets, with consequent pollution from diesel and rubber particles coming back up the drainage system and onto the busy shopping street.

Cllr Hare is now seeking assurances from Haringey Council that its contract with Thames Water for clearing drains is being properly monitored and implemented. In recent months, he has taken photographs of many blocked drains across the borough, including drains in the Wood Green area.

Cllr Bob Hare comments:

“We need assurances from Haringey Council that drains in Haringey are being cleared at the appropriate intervals, to help prevent these sorts of floods. In major centres such as Wood Green, this should be done every three months, but many drains seem to be blocked. The disruption last week was unacceptable for local businesses, and will no doubt result in insurance claims from some of the businesses that were flooded.The Council needs to take urgent steps to ensure that the contract for drain clearances is being properly implemented. Haringey’s drains are generally in a poor state, and action needs to be taken.”

ALEXANDRA LIB DEMS TO UNVEIL DESIGN BRIEF FOR 'TRIANGLE'

Lib Dem councillors in Alexandra ward have expressed delight at the completion of a draft design brief for the Triangle, a space situated at the junction of Palace Gates Road and Crescent Road, N22.

Over the last few years the councillors have worked with local residents to identify options for improving this neglected public open space.The councillors submitted a bid for funding to upgrade the site to the Muswell Hill Assembly budget last year. The assembly agreed to provide GBP1,300 funding to develop a design brief to assist with further development.

The draft design brief will be displayed at the next Assembly meeting on 14th July, where residents will have the opportunity to comment on proposals. Councillors will again be submitting a bid for funding this year to begin the upgrade process.

Cllr Wayne Hoban (Alexandra ward) comments:

“I am pleased to see that our efforts to upgrade the site for the benefit of all residents is at last producing results. I would encourage all residents to participate in the consultation process to ensure that the final design has widespread support.”

LIB DEMS UNCOVER BUNGLING COUNCIL'S MOBILE PHONE MAST BLUNDER

Lib Dem Deputy Leader Cllr Wayne Hoban has expressed shock and anger at Haringey Council’s failure to respond within the allotted time to the erection of a mobile phone mast and base unit in St Annes.

The mast is situated on a small patch of parkland on the St Annes Road / Seven Sisters Road junction. Residents complained to the Council as soon as they knew of the mast erection and asked them to contact the company, T-mobile, expressing their opposition and requesting a full consultation.

However, when Cllr Hoban met members of St Annes Residents Association during his election campaign, he was informed that Haringey Council had failed to contact T-mobile within the 56-day period allowed to respond to a mast erection.

Since meeting with residents he has contacted the Council and demanded an explanation. In response the Council have claimed in their defence that the letter was sent before the 56-day deadline had passed and that officers were unaware that the deadline existed.

They forwarded a copy of the letter sent to T-mobile which was dated two days before the deadline. However the deadline day was Sunday and consequently, the letter, posted on the Friday, did not arrive until Monday – after the deadline.

Cllr Hoban is angry that a rare piece of green open space in the ward has been ruined by a Council blunder. He adds that the failure of the Council to stop the mast goes against assurances made by the Council with regard to phone masts.

Cllr Hoban comments:

“Haringey Council Executive members in the past have assured me that where mobile masts adversely affect the environment, they would be opposed. With green open space at a premium in this area, the Council should have acted quickly and fought against this mast.

“They have failed to deliver and their incompetence has resulted in a permanent eyesore for the residents of St.Annes.If mobile masts and base stations were subject to the full planning process in line with Lib Dem policy, this situation would not have arisen.I will continue in my efforts to persuade the Council to adopt this policy in the interests of all residents.”