COSTS OF IRAQ WAR REVEALED

Lynne Featherstone, Lib Dem MP for Hornsey and Wood Green has obtained from Tony Blair’s government the most up to date figures on the cost of the Iraq war.

In a reply to a parliamentary question from Lynne Featherstone MP, the Secretary of State for the Ministry of Defence has admitted that the first three years of the Iraq war have cost a staggering £2.8 million per day, with a total cost to April 2005 of over £3,000 million.

These figures do not include the costs of rebuilding or dealing with the aftermath from the war.

Lynne Featherstone MP for Hornsey & Wood Green said:

“This huge sum of money makes a mockery of Gordon Brown’s claims to be the ‘prudent Chancellor’. By supporting an unjust and illegal war, he and Tony Blair have wasted billions which could have been better spent on modernising police stations, building new schools and hospitals or more key worker housing – stuff we need.

“The decision to go to war was made by a Tony Blair and George Bush. It’s clear that it was a decision made on incomplete information and with no plan for peace. Liberal Democrats said it then, and we have been proven right every step of the way.”

URGENT REPAIRS NEEDED AT MUSWELL HILL LIBRARY

Liberal Democrat councillor Gail Engert has been pressing Haringey Council to carry out urgent repairs at Muswell Hill Library, following an admission that there is a budgetary allocation for repairs at the library – yet parts of the library are being left in a sorry state.

Councillor Engert recently visited the library to examine the state of disrepair that is the result of a long period of neglect by Haringey Council. She sent a series of photos to Haringey Council to highlight the terrible state of the public areas in the Children’s Library, the public toilets and the baby changing area, with a request that the Council take immediate action to rectify this neglect.

Councillor Gail Engert (Muswell Hill) comments:

“If there is room in this year’s budget for repairs at the library, why have they not yet been carried out? This is just the latest example of the Council’s indifference to the users of the library – they have been without hot water in the public toilets for months, and despite the very cold winter a new heater was only installed in February. The Council must take action to rectify the terrible conditions at Muswell Hill Library.”

RESIDENTS FURIOUS FOLLOWING COUNCIL REFUSAL TO APOLOGISE FOR BANNERS

Residents of Muswell Hill, Highgate, Fortis Green and Alexandra wards had the chance to voice their anger over the controversial new lamppost advertising banners at the Muswell Hill Area Assembly last night. Charles Adje, Labour Leader of Haringey Council, faced furious residents who questioned him as to why the Council had felt that there had been no need to consult local people over the unsightly banners.

However, the Leader of the Council could offer, “no apology for keeping residents informed” of Council actions in the borough. This justification for the erection of the banners did not sit well with many residents, who feel that the banners are not only a poorly disguised political ploy, but the latest in a long series of Council actions taken without consultation with local people.

Liberal Democrat Group Leader Neil Williams comments:

“The Council’s arrogance and self-interest here is clear. They have signed a fifteen-year contract for these banners to be placed around the borough, and have not consulted local residents in order to do so.

“As if this wasn’t enough, it is quite obvious after last night’s meeting that Councillor Adje is not bothered in the slightest about residents’ concerns – indeed, it seems probable that the Council did not consult residents in the first place because they knew that most would be against the idea, especially given the council’s own guidelines on reducing street clutter. They are riding roughshod over their own rules.”

Police and Justice Bill

Monday was the second reading of the Police and Justice Bill on which I am leading. The Bill is one of those typical Labour efforts which has a number of sensible proposals combined with some hideous ones. And as ever – the overall trend is to centralise power over the police and police authorities directly into the hands of Charles Clark as Home Secretary. Bet they’d never have supported a Bill that put direct intervention in how the police did their work straight into the hands of Michael Howard!

Someone sent me a comment after the debate complaining that I read from a script during it. So – for the avoidance of confusion – all the frontbenchers from all three parties who make speeches of around half an hour or more in opening statement on the Bill worked from written speeches. The difference is – I wrote my own – whereas I am pretty sure that Charles Clark’s is prepared for him – and I don’t know if Nick Herbert who lead for the Tories wrote his or not. The bit that cheeses me off is the other two have a Despatch Box to lay their papers on – but I have to work in mid-air!

As frontbench spokesperson dealing with this debate – my prime duty as I see it is to get written into the record the issues of concern with the Bill and to lay down our marker for the Committee, Report and Third Reading to come – the battleground. Whilst we all add a bit of speechifying – that is the purpose. Backbench speeches vary more – in that they are generally on a particular constituency issue or particular political point – rather than having to cover the whole extent of the Bill and generally much shorter so that members who want to speak in a debate can get called within the allotted time.

You can read the speech in Hansard.

As you can see – I call the Bill ‘pernicious’ and ‘sneaky’ because it is another one of Labour’s ‘abolition of Parliament’ efforts. Outside of the power grab for the Home Secretary, the extension of surveillance of the innocent, the removal of protection for prisoners from Human Rights abuse and so on – it also has an extensive section on extradition.

Currently, and arising from hasty moves during the post-9/11 debates, the USA can extract one of their citizens from our shores and only have to prove that the person is the person they want. However, if we want to extract one of our citizens from their shores – we have to give prima facie evidence to prove that the person is guilty of the offence for which we are seeking extradition. To add insult to injury – whereas we brought that law into force by statute – the Americans never even ratified their end. So we are voluntarily complying with this unequal legislation. Moreover – it was brought into being for terrorism emergency use – but now the USA is using it for much else. So the Committee stage of the Bill will offer a good opportunity to properly debate this lopsided state of affairs – and ask why we’re letting the Americans do things here they won’t let us do over there.

Also today – the first wave of Ming’s shadow cabinet was announced Monday – and Chris Huhne gets the Environment portfolio – which is fantastic! An eco-economist – this will really give this portfolio the strength and importance it needs. Climate change is one of the biggest dangers threatening us. Nick Clegg gets Home Affairs (and so – if I stay in the Home Affairs team – my new boss).

HARINGEY LIBERAL DEMOCRATS BUOYANT AFTER MING CAMPBELL BECOMES LEADER

Sir Menzies Campbell’s election as Leader of the Liberal Democrats has left the Haringey Liberal Democrats with a sense of optimism and conviction, and they are now gearing up to fight Labour for control of Haringey Council in May’s council elections.

The final election count was held locally at the Electoral Reform Services Election Centre on Clarendon Road in Noel Park. Sir Menzies’ election coincides with a resurgence of national support for the Liberal Democrats across the country in recent polls – a recent MORI poll shows that national support has risen in recent weeks – up 3 points since January.

Lynne Featherstone MP said:

“Ming will lead a charge against inequality in what has become an ever widening gap between the rich and the poor under Blair and before that the Tories. That is the challenge of our time and scourge of our communities. Studies show that extreme gaps create tension, crime and unhappiness – for everyone. Our challenge is to close the gap.

“Moreover, Ming has put at the top of his agenda the swing away from personal taxation and a move towards behaviour taxation – so that eco-taxed can both improve our environment and be used to take the lowest paid out of tax altogether. With ice caps melting global warming is no longer somewhere else or some time in the future – it is now!”

Councillor Neil Williams, Leader of the Haringey Liberal Democrat Group, said:

“With Ming at the head of our party, we feel even more confident than before about taking on the Labour Party in May. He has made it clear what the Liberal Democrats stand for – a fairer, greener, more locally governed and democratic Britain that is at peace with itself both at home and abroad.

“The complacency and incompetence of the Haringey Labour party has not gone unnoticed by local people. Just as the British are fed up with the Labour party’s poor record on value for money on a national level, the people of Haringey are fed up with Labour wasting their Council Taxes and providing poor local services. I look forward to May when local people will get the chance to decide who they believe should be running the Council.”

RESIDENTS OUTRAGED OVER LACK OF SHELTERED HOUSING SUPPORT

Residents and tenants’ representatives at Thursday night’s Hornsey Area Housing Forum expressed outrage at the lack of scheme managers at a number of sheltered housing schemes across Haringey.

Five full-time scheme managers moved to become part of the ALMO team in January and over eight weeks later the sheltered housing residents in those schemes have not had appropriate full-time cover.

Cllr Gail Engert (Lib Dem, Muswell Hill) has already been in correspondence with Haringey Council to ask why the scheme managers have not been replaced and received assurances that the service to residents was not being affected. However, the meeting at Hornsey Town Hall backs up previous conversations Cllr Engert has had with residents of sheltered housing schemes which contradict this.

Cllr Engert comments:

“These residents are deeply concerned about the ongoing lack of scheme managers to look after them. Full-time scheme managers have been replaced with just a short morning visit by an area relief manager and emergency cords in the properties, which is clearly not the same level of cover to the residents.

“It is essential that full cover is resumed as soon as possible for all these residents, many of whom are elderly and vulnerable. The Council must also explain why the previous scheme managers moved into their new ALMO roles in January, without plans having been made to ensure unbroken cover for the sheltered housing residents. It seems to be very poor planning and residents are rightly angry about the situation.”

Ming Campbell's conference speech

Ming’s speech is the big event of the day.

It was, once again, motivating and uplifting and he started with a really good line. He said, “For those of you don’t expect me to be here too long, I have a worrying statistic for you. The previous Ming dynasty lasted for 276 years”!

Got back to London around 8.30pm and have to write speech for tomorrow’s second reading of the Police Justice Bill – and that’s a whole ‘nother story.

Spring conference in Harrogate

Of course the big debate was the Royal Mail/Post Office debate. It passed. It had been radically altered since the last conference when it was defeated and sent back to the drawing board. I had voted against it then. But this time it was better. 51% remaining in state ownership, worker participation and shares and for me the real clincher. It safeguarded the universal postal service and allows us to reopen lots of the post offices that Labour have closed.

And I have to say – having carried out a postal service survey a little while ago which I am currently analysing the responses – we got 6,000 responses and still rising. Many of these were complaints. To be fair to Royal Mail, it has offered and is currently addressing the casework I have given them. However, it is very clear – that this service is malfunctioning and now that competition in the market place has arrived from the continent it will be do or die. This is a radical Liberal Democrat solution to save the universal postage system and reopen post offices. And yes – selling off some of it (but not the majority shares) will pay for this. (You can read the full details of the policy on the Lib Dem website).

Labour’s closure of Post Offices has been absolutely disastrous for our local high streets and shopping parades – and particularly for elderly people whose visit to the PO to get their pensions is often the only outing of the week.

So the motion passes. It was never in any doubt really – as the new leader had also put his weight solidly behind this and it was much, much improved since I last saw it.

We then had our first Parliamentary Party meeting (PPM) with Ming. And he was really great.

I stop to do a Party Political Broadcast bit of filming and then after a quick sandwich am off to Betty’s famous tea house to do a podcast for the Guardian. Podcasts are clearly in – as this is my second one in as many weeks (last one was with Guido Fawkes and Recess Monkey).

The queue for Betty’s is very long – and after about half an hour (and Willie Rennie was meant to be here too but is running late) we get a table but have actually done the pod cast recording in the queue as I have to dash off to do a fringe meeting where I am speaking on police force mergers.

Harrogate rally

Having got, finally, to Harrogate – I’m on as one of the main speaker at the evening rally.

The room was packed with probably about 400 or so delegates. I would love to think it was me they came to listen to – but I expect the attendance had more to do with the imminent speech of the new leader. I was the last speaker for the rally which was called ‘Meeting the Challenge’ and I was proposing a radical agenda on the inequalities that are widening under the Blair regime.

My speech goes down really well (if I say so myself)! But happily – lots of other people say so too! Then there was a couple of minutes from each of the most recent by-election winners – Mark Hunter, Willie Rennie and Sarah Teather. Duncan Brack, who is Chair of Conference Committee introduced one speaker thus:

‘There is an Australian rock musician called Mark Hunter. There is an American navel officer called William Rennie. But there is only one Sarah Teather!’

I thought that was witty!

And then the grand entry of our new leader. And Ming was on good form. He has seemed very happy and confident since his win. He reiterates the crusade against poverty and that he will arm our party with the campaigning tools we need to match the other parties. He is certainly saying all the right things.

I go back to my room and find a message on my phone from the Press Office to say that Question Time have bumped me off the program next Thursday in favour of Nick Clegg – as he is on the Ming team and therefore because of the result they want a Minger!

Then I go to dinner with the World This Weekend team, who have invited me, Paul Marshall and Michael Moore. It was really very pleasant evening. However, the snow and ice was vicious outside and I had to hang onto Brian Hanrahan all the way back for dear life!

Why I became an MP

If I look back at my journey to the House of Commons, actually it began long before I took any formal steps on the political road.

I was never able to keep my mouth shut or refrain from interfering when I saw or heard something going on that I thought was wrong, or unfair or cruel. If I saw a big child bullying a small child – up I would pop to tell the bully to stop – whatever their size!

When I was in any gathering of people and someone would say something derogatory about others who were gay or black or Jewish – I would always confront them – never letting casual collusion hold sway.

And I was always trying to help people – whether they wanted help or not. As a young teenager I visited old people in their homes. I progressed to volunteering once a week with a hospital radio station – sometimes doing programmes from the wards and then later I worked as a volunteer in a big London hospital taking menus around the wards and sitting as company with those patients who were terribly and often terminally ill – but who had no family.

Now put all that together with my student days at Oxford Brookes (it used to be OxPoly) – where to be anything other than revolutionary ruined your social life. It was there that I marched against Maggie Thatcher (in those days Education Minister trying to take power away from student unions) and threw flour-bags at her effigy.

It was also there that I led my first campaign. It wasn’t political per se – but the powers that be wanted to turn it into a university and have all degree courses instead of (in my view) continuing the phenomenal Shirley Williams’ vision of polytechnics where all skills – whether academic or trades – are together. My own course – an art and design course – was one of those under threat. So the ‘Save Art’ campaign was my first. It was magnificent. We did delay the termination – but as with all student days – they come to an end and as you can see – after my era there it did eventually become a university.

Anyway – that campaign politicised me – and I looked at the three options then. Back then in around 1974 the Tories had brought the country to ruin with the three-day week. When they fell and Wilson and the Labour government came in – they were equally dreadful. And in those days there were only six Liberal MPs and the Liberals were not really an option for me.

So I went away for twenty years and lived my life, had a career (designer), marriage, two children and divorced! When my children were about two and seven, Maggie Thatcher was Prime Minister and I thought she was creating a terrible, selfish, me first world. It was then that I decided to throw my hat in the political ring and fight for the sort of world I wanted to bring my children up in. All the volunteering I had done had been personally rewarding – but it didn’t change the big picture of what was wrong. Only the political process could really deliver that sort of change – so politics it would be.

Back then, I had a hard time choosing between Labour and Liberal Democrats (what was the old Liberal Party had grown up, joined with the Social Democrats and become a properly rounded political philosophy). In the end I chose the Lib Dems because of their values and beliefs about equality and justice, fairness, the individual and community, their commitment to the environment and their internationalist perspective. And I couldn’t stomach the authoritarianism and centralist controlling structures of the Labour Party.

So – the rest is mostly have mouth will travel! I joined the Liberal Democrats – and politics and I found each other. From when I first stood to be MP for Hornsey & Wood Green in 1997 – finishing 26,000 votes behind Labour – to winning in May 2005 took eight years (and three general elections in total). I also spent eight years as a councillor on Haringey where we went 0 to 25 councillors and are now hoping to take the Council next time – and on route I spent five years on the London Assembly.

So – it was never about ‘becoming’ an MP. It was always about driving forward a political agenda about all the things I hold important. Just as now I am here in the Commons – it’s not about ‘being’ an MP – it’s about what you can do whilst you are here!

This piece first appeared in Politick! – a cross-party political magazine for young people aged 16-35.

(c) Lynne Featherstone, 2008