Haringey Shed

Earlier in the day I went to see Haringey Shed (a theatre workshop grouping which mixes children with some disabilities with those without). It has a phenomenal reputation for its work. It has become so popular that there is a waiting list a mile long despite its recent expansion to the west of the borough.

The kids are just wonderful – and do a few workshop exercises before running through a rehearsal of the performance they are giving next Saturday. But what the group really needs is funding for one more staff salary. It is a charity and it has some support at the moment from Haringey Council. It can make bids for capital expenditure to granting and funding organisations, but the funding is not for things like salaries – but for projects and the like. So we scratch our heads about who might be willing to fund three years of one person’s salary.
I kid you not – this is such a wonderful idea – doing exactly what we need in our society today. Bringing everyone together – all colours and all creeds!

So if anyone has any ideas for funding or wants to donate – please let me know and I will put you directly in touch with Haringey Shed.

Noel Park playground

Lynne Featherstone with local parents in Noel ParkLocal parents have contacted me in desperation as their children face a second summer without play equipment at the Noel Park Recreation Ground. I meet with a representative of the Parents Forum in the park where the playground should be. She has two of her four children with her who will be without this summer. I understand the equipment was taken out when the Children’s Centre was being built – the promise was that it would be replaced with new equipment when the Centre was finished. It has been finished now for some time and despite repeated promises, there is still no sign of the new equipment being installed.

There have been meetings to view plans and discussions with the Council’s consultant – so it is hard to imagine what could be holding up the delivery and implementation. There was plenty of time to plan its installation whilst the building was ongoing. As for cost: it was always going to be needed in the budget – so I cannot imagine that it is a budgetary problem.

I have written to the Chief Executive of Haringey Council to find out what the delay is. The Labour administration originally gave assurances that they would replace the equipment so I am turning to the management to speedily make it happen. If the CE comes back and says the hold up is because the administration have not given it the go ahead and therefore they are breaking their promises – we will then know who to blame!

Alongside this issue, there is also the issue of the equipment to be provided for young people in the grounds too. It is clear from the vandalism already taking place (graffiti on the doors and broken window of the new Centre) that it is vital that their area is also resolved as soon as possible. But first things first. It’s a long summer and Noel Park Rec Ground is quite a lovely open space – it just needs what has been promised!

The future of Fortismere School

Several people responded to my blog posting about my meeting with Fortismere’s Head and the Chair of Governors.

The main thrust of the comment was the bit in my blog entry about the ‘categoric assurances’ I had received from the Head of Governors that there had been no discussion about becoming a Trust School.

I have been shown a copy of the Strategic Planning Paper prepared for the Governors by the previous Acting Head, which lists Trust Schools as a possible course for the school, and am now told that this was ‘fully discussed’ by them in a Governing Body meeting in May this year.

The second thread of concern seems to be around the Head’s intentions with regard to access to Fortismere for statemented children. Where the Head made it quite clear to me in my meeting with him that any statemented child would be able to name Fortismere as their chosen school – there is a counter view that there is a strategy in here somewhere to reduce the number of statemented children coming to the school.

I do not know where the truth actually lies on these issues. What I do know is that we are talking about the future of a school, a wonderful school, where we need the Head, the Governors, the teachers and the parents and pupils to all support whatever route is taken for the future. Therefore, it is paramount that there is no equivocation around the truth. With so much conflicting information around, it would be helpful to have a written declaration of intent signed by the Head and Board of Governors which addresses all the concerns and on which the parents could then vote in a proper democratic ballot. Then whatever the settled will of the parents it would be a basis on which all could move forward together with a common understanding.

Community development – what do the Government's plans amount to?

Friday / Saturday was spent away, doing my duties as a trustee of the Community Development Foundation. And now I do know a lot more. I am on this as it requires an MP from each of the three main parties. The Labour MP is the Chair of the Board of Trustees and the rest of the members are made up from the four nations of the United Kingdom and from a range of high-level expertise.

As this was my first meeting, I do what I usually do when I am new: I read my papers thoroughly and kept my mouth mostly shut except where necessary! The senior management of the Foundation were also with us. It was clear at the first session that a great deal of work and energy was being put into this agenda – but that the Trustees were needing more access to the business processes and issues involved.

‘Community Development’ is about empowering members of the community and growing their capacity to influence decisions being made about their lives. Many of us, we know how to complain, how to raise issues, how to engage, how to access services, etc. – but there are even more who do not. And in the end, a community can only improve if it comes from within – so it’s about building from the within. To demonstrate some of this, we were taken by coach to Gamesley – a housing estate of some 3,500 people who had been uprooted from the middle of Manchester when it was redeveloped and put literally in the middle of nowhere. With rolling hills and sheep and farmland all around, it didn’t have the dirt and grime and sort of deprivation I as a London MP are used to – but deprived it certainly was. High level of single parents and unemployment, little transport to get to it or off it, low car ownership and so on.

We were talked to by the ‘workers’ on the estate – from adult education to Sure Start, police, residents’ association, Citizens Advice Bureau, local library manager, and so on. The enthusiasm of these individuals about their purpose and task was extremely high – and their partnership and cross-working was clearly beginning to have some results in getting people to engage and acquire skills. They had produced some really great community projects that had drawn in participation from people who never usually got involved in anything – and this was clearly creating community spirit and improving the estate. Back afterwards to the hotel for more papers and discussions.

So what did I think? I agree with the principle that the more engaged and participatory a community is, the better it will function and prosper. What worried me was concerns over whether some of the good intentions will turn out to be mere rhetoric. I have seen consultation devalued because the outcome wasn’t really ever in question. I have seen councils engaging local communities through various forums, but mostly it is about presenting what the council is doing – not listening to what local people necessarily want. Still – I am glad to have been appointed to this body as it is a really interesting area of work.

As I said previously, my only real connection to this scheme before was when I was asked to give out government cheques to various community groups as part of the program. And it was not just a cheque or two – but lots and thousands and thousands of pounds. I was worried then as to whether this money would empower people and how that was assessed – indeed if it was assessed. There were no answers yet to my questions – but at least they are now in the pot. There are so many initiatives, schemes and work programs going on – and such vast amounts of money being spent on them – I want to be sure that they produce real differences for the people in communities in whose name so much is being done.

As for today, I have just been writing articles, doing emails and my Ham & High column. Watched the Sunday morning political programs to see coverage of by-elections and hear the analysis of the disastrous Tory result in Bromley. Again the media are letting Boy David off relatively lightly considering the scale of his party’s drubbing. But there’s no hiding from his problem – core voters don’t appear to like where he wishes to take the party – and I don’t think there are enough votes without them for him to gain the seats he needs. Labour too had a bad night – they are the government and in big stink at the moment. Received wisdom is that they should get a bashing in by-elections at this point – but the official opposition should be way ahead, and they certainly were not!

Parking in Muswell Hill

Muswell Hill is a fantastically vibrant area with lots of shops – that’s why everyone wants to come here. But where you get residents and shops and staff and tradesmen, shoppers and everyone else wanting to park, the limited available space (despite two car parks) means some sorting out inevitably becomes necessary. So, on the back of requests for some parking to be made available on the limb of the Broadway that goes off to Colney Hatch Lane – as the shops here suffer from virtually no on-street parking – and to free up what on street parking there is on the main shopping streets – Haringey Council has decided to introduce pay and display in the main streets for short stay parking.

Not unnaturally – there are a number of aspects that will concern local people. There may be increased pressure on the surrounding residential roads as people try to find a free parking place. Removing the free parking on Fortis Green Road – where there are lots of flats – may well result in residents looking for parking on the surrounding residential roads. It may also mean that we lose more front gardens if pressure mounts to the point of people concreting over their front gardens. However, shops should benefit from shoppers being able to find short stay parking and the displacement may not be huge.

Given the high blood pressure that is caused by any proposal to introduce parking restriction or charging, it is vital that local Haringey Council considers all aspects including operating times, charging structure and position of bays to make sure that any scheme that goes ahead is seen as fair, easy to use, and with clear signage that avoids motorists getting parking tickets through misunderstanding the parking times or where they can stop. And above all, Haringey Council must really listen to the views of residents and local shops.

This is where you come in. Copies of the consultation document, including a map of the plans, should be available in Muswell Hill Library during the consultation period, as well as being available from Haringey Council’s website www.haringey.gov.uk.

It is really important to let Haringey Council know your views – so please write to the Council with any comments, support or objections, on the proposed ‘Stop and Shop’ scheme. Please write to Haringey Council, Traffic and Road Safety Group, River Park House, 1st Floor South, 225 High Road, Wood Green N22 8HQ or by email to Streetscene.consultation@haringey.gov.uk. Please also let me know your views.

Kenwood Concerts

Every Saturday and Sunday night around 10 o’clock, my poor dog (pedigree mutt) turns into a barking, shivering and shaking bag of nerves. It’s the Kenwood Concerts!

These wonderful concerts stretch way back in my memory (as I lived in Highgate on and off from the age of 5). Of course, in the good old days there weren’t that many; there certainly weren’t as many with firework displays – and there was no corporate hospitality.

Halcyon days when the hoi-polloi could go early enough with blanket and picnic to get right to the front. There was no roped off section. No deckchairs. Just happy bunnies laying out their blankets and picnics higgledy-piggledy. And it was sooooo cheap by comparison to today’s somewhat pricey outing. You’re looking at £100 for four basic – which is a lot for a family outing!

I know, I know – it’s the way of the world. Once it was taken over by ‘professional management’ – it all changed. I guess I am whistling for the moon. However, the increased commercialism has meant increased numbers, increased, parking, increased noise and increased disruption.

Each year now there is a battle between residents and concert organisers over the number of concerts and number of firework displays. Now you cannot park on any Saturday or Sunday for most of Hampstead Road from 2 – 10pm. Beware – because the signs are not overly obvious and the wardens are keen.

I write letters some years to plead for mercy for my dog – but the other side of the coin is that I still think the Kenwood Concerts are incredibly special and a wonderful night out on a summer’s eve and I am kind of proud that they belong to Highgate. And I still go at least once or twice a year.

I sit outside the official ticketed area with friends and children and we have our picnic, listen vaguely to what we can hear of the music, play games and watch the firework display free of charge.

So – as ever – the answer has to lie in the organisers working with local residents to find a reasonable compromise in terms of numbers of concerts and number of firework displays. And I think all of us who go to the concerts – whether we are local or not – we owe a debt of thanks to those residents who suffer our intrusion as we all traipse through their neck of the woods on a beautiful English summer’s eve.

Note: My colleagues in Highgate ward (Lib Dem councillors Bob Hare, Justin Portess and Neil Williams) have written a letter going into some detail about the current plans that are up for debate. You can read it here.

Bromley by-election

Wow! Stunning result in Bromley and Chislehurst. A big boost for the party to come so close (agonisingly close!) to winning what was one of the very safest Conservative seat in the country.

For us the lesson is fairly simple – it’s a shame that Ben Abbotts didn’t quite make it, but it was a fantastic result for him and the team. Also good news for Ming Campbell – he campaigned heavily in the seat.

But for the Tories – it’s a real dilemma I think. Clearly the Cameron message is not going down well with their core support. They should have been romping home in a safe seat like Bromley. When I was campaigning there, it certainly looked like the sort of place that is very Conservative. Not any more!

Now off to a weekend meeting of the Government’s Community Development Foundation (I’m a trustee) to see how the development of community cohesion is going and can be worked on. It seems from the outside like a very New Labour approach – but will be interesting to see from the inside how it’s going and whether that’s really the case.

One part of the overall agenda is the looking at the community empowerment network. Having handed out the cheques in Haringey to various voluntary groups as part of this scheme, I have been wondering how the success or otherwise of these payments is tracked. Will be interesting to see!

Two more bites of Big Brother

Another Statutory Instrument – but this time in committee and about extra powers being given to a variety of agencies with regard to intercept and communications data, and also about powers for covert surveillance and so on. Too complicated to relate now – but together the two do rather sum up what politics – and Labour’s approach – is heavily about at the moment.

BOWES PARK RESIDENTS FORCE FLATS RETHINK

Residents in Palm Court and neighbouring blocks of flats in Palmerston Road, Bowes Park, scored a victory on Monday night (June 26) when Haringey Council’s Planning Committee sent development plans back for a rethink.

Dudrich Holdings were again seeking planning permission to replace a range of existing garages at the rear of Palm Court with 8 2-bedroom dwellings. Previous Haringey Planning committees had already imposed height restrictions.

But at Monday’s meeting, councillors decided that there was insufficient access for emergency and other vehicles to the new flats as the plans stood, and that large picture windows at the back of the flats would spoil people’s enjoyment of the New River – recently designated an “Ecological Corridor” after collaboration between Haringey Council and Thames Water.

Some 30 residents attended, hoping to hear two of their number express fears over access, loss of amenity and design. But they were told their statements contained “no new material”, and so could not be heard.

There was applause, however, when ward councillor John Oakes, speaking on residents’ behalf, reminded the committee that these were “legitimate concerns”.

Cllr Oakes told the committee:

“The wheels of fire engines, ambulances and refuse-lorries will have only a couple of inches’ clearance when they are called to these new houses. Residents have a right to live safely and healthily, and Haringey’s regulations provide for that. These plans do not.

“And the peace and seclusion of the New River corridor is enjoyed by hundreds of local residents who don’t have a garden of their own. I am asking that this committee does all it can to lessen the intrusion of these new buildings, by asking for a re-design of the large rear windows, and more planting.”

The committee decided to make planning permission conditional on alterations to the current access-routes and rear elevations.

Palm Court residents’ spokesperson Emma Jane Crisp said afterwards:

“I and all the residents of Palmerston Road and Bowes Park are thrilled that the Council has decided to reject this application in its present form. We were grateful that the Chair allowed Cllr Oakes to speak on our behalf.

“It was fantastic to see such show of force from all the residents attending this meeting. Planning on this site is obviously a matter that greatly concerns many local people and this has been a great example of what residents can achieve by working together.”