Do parents have choice over Haringey schools?

Met with Labour Council Leader George Meehan first thing. George says there shouldn’t be a problem for the 200 children without secondary school places as they will start to diminish as the choices get made and the places get filled. But only one in five children in Haringey got their first or second choice – and I remain concerned that not getting those choices mean that the Government’s ‘choice’ agenda is meaningless. Instead of getting the schools they have chosen, children and parents end up with schools that are far away across multiple bus journeys and which were put at or near the bottom of their list of choices. That’s not choice.

I remember one particular woman who came to see me at my surgery whose daughter had gone to a local primary school in Highgate. All the other kids from her block of flats had been accepted to one particular secondary school – and only this child had not. The girl instead had to go to a school that was near the bottom of the list of her choices and a difficult journey away; the girl was then (as the mother had feared) bullied and was now at home refusing to go to school through fear.

Perhaps if the schools published a map with dots on showing where all the children who get in come from (with an asterisk for special needs as they come from outside catchments) then we could all see for ourselves how ‘fair’ the system is and how far children are having to go if they don’t get their first or second choices. At the moment, there remains the suspicion that despite efforts to get it right, miscarriages of justice occur. The system needs to be fair and seen to be fair. Transparency and publication might help our confidence in the system.

Other topics I covered with George were on the use of the voluntary sector, the ‘restructuring’ of the library service; what Haringey Council is proposing to do following my discovery that both HIV infection and alcohol-related deaths in the borough are up substantially and also why my surgery poster is not allowed in schools!

Teachers without borders

I’ve been thinking! Dangerous I know – but with a new portfolio such asInternational Development – that’s my role. And out of all the briefings I’ve had about all the injustices and challenges of the developing world, the one that jumped out at me was the plight of children – orphaned, displaced and traumatized, sometimes for generations.

When war wrecks a child’s life – be it the murder of their families, loss of their home, displacement or injury – they are left vulnerable and fragile. Where natural disaster, war or protracted conflict rages the world rushes in with medicine, food, water and shelter – obviously. But there is something more that is needed – even at that first point. It is education. Despite the life-saving benefits of education, in emergencies and in protracted conflicts where war can deny children a future for decades – children are missing out because education is currently not part of the humanitarian response.

According to research conducted by Save the Children, 39 million of the 77 million children still missing out on primary school education are in conflict-affected states. When I questioned Hilary Benn (Secretary of State for International Development) on this recently he agreed on the record that education should now be considered part of humanitarian response.

The physical and material destruction of war and conflict is bad enough, but the lack of access to education sometimes for years and decades has a devastating effect on the (re)building of any sort of future for the people and the country.

Focusing on education in a conflict zone is vital in order to establish a future for that region. War only teaches war. Children need not only the therapeutic medicine of learning itself but also – as they emerge from the carnage – children need to be given the skills and capacity to become anything from farmers to pharmacists.

Moreover, the relationship between education and community and political participation is well established. Participation in education contributes to community action and national political life. Teachers can also help children to develop new skills and knowledge necessary for survival and coping in a post-conflict environment, including landmine awareness and safety, negotiation and problem solving, and information about HIV/AIDS and other health issues.

In the long term, education can lay the foundations for lasting peace and development by providing a whole generation with the skills to build their country. After conflict, an educated population offers people the skills to rebuild their lives. However, if education is missing for years and generations during conflict, then you will not have the educated population to establish peace, civic society and economic prosperity needed to create a future.

So – the big idea is to create a sort of education version of the Red Cross to go into regions ravaged by conflict to deliver an educational capability in the same swift way that the humanitarian organisations like the Red Cross and Medecins Sans Frontiers go in to provide humanitarian aid. Teachers Without Borders would provide a first response to the educational needs and build capacity in the locality – because this would be about meeting immediate needs rather than staying for years and years as a substitute education service.

Similar arrangements already exist in other areas. For example, police officers are often deployed on peace support operations. Through advising, training and monitoring, they help support fragile states and help make and keep the peace.

Practical models already exist for the short-term release of education professionals for other purposes. For example, a system of deferred payment allows experienced Australian teachers to take time out from their schools for professional development, industry placements, or international community work.

Perhaps the best part of this concept is that a few weeks after I first started floating it, Gordon Brown – he of Number 11, wishing he were at Number 10, Downing Street – voiced support for the concept in Parliament. Thus – this idea is going with the grain of what is possible to achieve even under the current political management.

To help flesh out the idea I have set up a special website http://www.teacherswithoutborders.info with more details and a chance for people to submit their views on several of the key points. Please take a few moments to visit, read and let me know your thoughts – especially if you are involved in development or education issues yourself. And if you don’t have internet access, just write to me at House of Commons, London, SW1A 1AA.

(c) Lynne Featherstone, 2007

Lib Dem councillor welcomes planning permission refusal

Cllr Jonathan Bloch (Muswell Hill) has welcomed the decision made by Haringey Council to refuse planning permission for the retention of a portakabin for use as a nursery on Crouch End Playing Fields.

The application by North Middlesex Cricket Club was refused by the Council on 6th March 2007 on the grounds that the building was inappropriate, visually intrusive and has potential nuisance for adjoining properties.

Cllr Bloch comments:

“I welcome this ruling and now urge the developers to engage with the local community and to obey planning regulations and procedures”.

Haringey caves in to Lib Dem councillors and local campaigners over moves towards Highgate CPZ consultation

Commenting on the announcement that Haringey Councilhas agreed to get on as soon as possible with consultation on the Highgate station CPZ after a high profile campaign by Lib Dem councillors and local residents, Lib Dem Leader and Highgate councillor Neil Williams said:

“Firstly, this is a great victory for local residents who have worked so hard with local councillors to get the Council to see sense on this issue. From a flat ‘no’, in a couple of weeks, we have had a complete U-turn from the Council.

“However, Haringey’s attempts to blame Islington council for the mess they have created are quite pathetic. They have had since last July to sort this problem out, and if they didn’t know Islington were expanding residents parking on their side of Hornsey Lane, then you have to wonder what on earth they are doing.

“It is quite dishonest, because they already knew all about the Islington scheme when they were refusing to take action a couple of weeks ago. Cllr Brian Haley and Haringey Council would hide behind anyone rather than take responsibility for their own blunders.”

Haringey Council to adopt new logo: "like it or lump it!"

Labour councillor Lorna Reith (Executive member for Community Involvement) dropped a bombshell at Monday’s (12 March) meting of Overview and Scrutiny Committee (OSC). She announced that Haringey is about to adopt a new logo, corporate colours and typeface.

The whole project has been conducted in secret with no consultation.

Chair of OSC, Labour councillor Gideon Bull, on hearing the news, described himself as “Speechless, absolutely speechless.”Not something people would normally associate with the usually ebullient chair, say the Lib Dems.

All seven members of OSC, in common with all Labour backbenchers and all Lib Dem councillors had no idea that such an announcement was to be made or even that consultants had been engaged.The new logo was described by Lib Dem councillor David Winskill as looking like “…a squashed spider under a bookcase.”

On a practical point, Cllr Gail Engert, herself a professional designer, questioned the wisdom of using a rust-red typeface on a black background. “I am sure that this will be difficult to read by people with sight impairment.”

Labour Councillor John Bevan was astonished that the project was even being undertaken, “at a time when we have just has a terrible financial settlement from the Government.”

Cllr Winskill suggested that the project could have taken the form of a competition. He comments:

“Haringey is bursting with graphic design talent. Why it never occurred to Haringey to organise a competition and pay the winner is typical – Labour councillors are so out of touch. A competition could have been a great boost for youngsters trying to start their careers.”

Climate Change is not caused by human activity, says top local Tory

Haringey Lib Dems have severely criticised comments by Justin Hinchcliffe, Chair of Tottenham Tories, for comments denying that climate change is caused by human activity.

In his blog, Mr Hinchcliffe states, “The point is that it is not caused by the CO2 emitted by human development – it is not caused by MAN.”

Councillor Bob Hare, Lib Dem Environment Spokesperson, comments:

“As a society we should never be afraid of healthy debate, but when such a strong consensus exists from the respected scientific community, who know a whole lot more about this than Justin, you have to wonder what planet he’s living on.

“It just shows that David Cameron’s attempt to re-brand the Tories is just a PR exercise. No matter how many trees they have in their logo, their pronouncements on the environment are just plain old green wash to make voters think they are more environmental friendly than they really are. These comments reveal the Tories in their true colours when it comes to climate change.”

Councillor Ed Butcher, Deputy Environment Spokesperson for Haringey Lib Dems, adds:

“Comments like these make me shiver and remind me of the drivel we used to hear from oil companies who spent million on PR trying to convince the world that climate change didn’t exist. Thankfully, they have woken up to their responsibility to the environment – maybe local Tories should too.”

Hewitt forced to apologise but fails to play fair on funding

Labour Secretary of State for Health Patricia Hewitt has been forced to apologise for not replying to a letter sent to her by Haringey Council’s ‘watchdog’ committee.

Haringey Liberal Democrats have highlighted that whilst the apology is welcome there are no commitments to ensure the raid of Haringey’s health spending will not happen in the future.

A letter was originally sent by the Overview and Scrutiny committee in November 2006 and questioned cuts to health spending in Haringey. This received only a standard customer services reply prompting the Liberal Democrat to press for an adequate response and forcing the Labour Council leader to declare the letter “unacceptable”.

Patricia Hewitt finally replied saying the recent raid on Haringey’s health budget was a “contribution” and that this will be paid back within three years. However, she refused to say when the £12m that will be taken from the 2007/08 budget will be returned.Liberal Democrats believe that Patricia Hewitt shows in this letter the endemic failures of the Health Service under Labour and to her own declaration she does “not understand the over-spending in some parts of London”.

Cllr Richard Wilson (Lib Dem Health and Social Services Spokesperson) comments:

“Haringey Liberal Democrats believe that Patricia Hewitt should be apologising for the financial chaos she and the Labour government has put the NHS in.Haringey Primary Care Trust has been told to expect a raid of up to £12 million on this year’s budget, with no guarantee of when this money will be returned.This raid means our local NHS faces another round of cost-cutting and service reduction.”

Cllr Neil Williams (Leader of the Opposition) added:

“Haringey’s Labour MP and Labour councillors need to do more to stand up for the NHS in our area and against the Government’s mismanagement of its finances.”

School places crisis: one in five children fail to receive first or second preferences

Haringey Liberal Democrats have highlighted the growing uncertainty surrounding the allocation of secondary school places in the London Borough of Haringey. Figures released by Haringey Council have shown the percentage of children not receiving their first two secondary school preferences has grown to an unprecedented one in five.

The number of children not receiving their first two places increased over the past three years – from 11% in 2005, to 18% in 2006 and now 20% in 2007.

The increase is exacerbated by a chronic shortage of places in Haringey’s secondary schools. Figures released for the School Organisation Committee meeting on 14th March 2007 shows that Haringey’s secondary school surplus capacity is 2.06% compared to the Department for Education and Skills recommendation of 5%.

Cllr Gail Engert (Lib Dem Children and Young People spokesperson) comments:

“It is unacceptable that this crisis is getting worse each year. Haringey Council need to take action. The Lib Dems have said that the new secondary school in Haringey was needed in 2008 rather than the projected 2010. The lack of secondary school places is something that, as a consequence of Labour’s indecision, will not diminish in the near future”.

Lynne Featherstone, MP for Hornsey and Wood Green adds:

“The situation is clearly spiralling out of control. With so many parents being denied their first and second choice, Labour’s rhetoric on education and choice will mean nothing to families who now face the difficult and often heart-breaking decision in working out what to do next.This Council has simply failed to plan in any coherent way and again Haringey parents are suffering the consequences.”

Channel 4: about as wrong as you can be

Yesterday’s Channel 4 programme – Great Global Warming Swindle – supposedly debunking global warming has got it all wrong. Now – I’m all for scepticism and testing out arguments properly. So just because nearly every reputable scientist in the field believes global warming is real and a major problem isn’t a reason to close our minds on the subject. But if you are going to question it, you really need to do better than recycle old arguments that have long since been debunked.

What did the show have then? New evidence? No. New arguments? No. Rather just the same old sensation-seeking half-stories that have been rolled out and debunked many times before. There’s a good summary of the details of all this at In The Green.

So sorry Channel 4 – you get an F for fail for that programme.