Visiting the Harrington Scheme, Highgate

At the weekend, I visited the Harrington Scheme in Highgate where those with learning disabilities and other challenges are trained in skills that will not only lead to employment – but also and being able to manage their lives themselves where possible.

Gardening is their main training program and what a wonderful place this is, both physically and emotionally. It is so beautiful – with well laid out training gardens, polythene tunnels for winter work and a fantastic walled garden. The buildings house a variety of functions including classrooms, kitchens for training in how to cook etc. There is a great need for a new building for more classrooms – but no capital funding available.

What struck me most, outside of the unbelievable dedication, commitment and untiring efforts of those involved like Leila Hodge and the Friends of Harringey and Joanna – one of the key staff members – was the amount of effort and time they all had to spend on fund-raising additional to trying to make this the best of training schemes available to move young people with difficulties into work.

One issue coming down the track is the transfer of their core funding – this part making up about 60% of their total funding – which will transfer from central government to the local authority in two years time. The fear is that Haringey will not passport that money through in its entirety to Harrington – because not all the young people come from Haringey itself but from several other boroughs.

So I will investigate further what safeguards the Government is going to put in place to ensure ongoing funding – as it applies not only to Harrington but to other groups who give benefits to people and are based in one local council area but who provide places for people coming from out of borough as well.

In the old days before central funding they used to cross bill from authority to authority – but that is burdensome and complicated. I would like to see if there is a means to protect the funding to remain for its intended use and to stop authorities re-directing it for their own purposes. Otherwise – groups like this will be in even more funding difficulties.

There were lots of other issues – mostly about funding – which I will pursue on their behalf. But mostly what I want people to take from this blog entry is the wonderful work that is going on to make the lives of those who have so many more challenges than most of us so fulfilled, useful and happy. And to get recognition for all those who are so utterly dedicated and have been over so many years – to carrying on this vital work.

Congrats to all involved with Harrington. I was well impressed!

The ghost at the feast

On Friday went to the ‘thank you’ party for all those who worked on the London elections for the Liberal Democrats. Nice to see Dee Doocey and Mike Tuffrey who are two of our ongoing LibDem members on the GLA and get all the gossip about who was doing what with whom – in the sense of chairing committees and so on. All change again apparently as Liberal Democrats, Labour and Greens combine to try to make the Assembly work and really hold the Mayor to account.

However, the rules are stacked in favour of the Mayor when it comes to the budget – as it requires a two-thirds majority to reject the Mayor’s budget. The Tories have over a third of the seats – so enough to rubber stamp whatever Boris wants. Nowhere else can a budget be passed on a minority vote. Ho hum!

What was either sad or sweet – depending how you look on it – was apparently Ken Livingstone was in the gallery watching the Assembly meeting as it made its first decisions after the elections – the ghost at the feast. I can’t imagine what that felt like – to see the how going on without you – when you have been the sole proprietor for so many years. Poignant – maybe?

I’ve noticed a bit of speculation in cyberworld as to whether Ken will seek a parliamentary seat – perhaps mine or his old stomping ground in Brent. Can’t imagine why he would want to go back into the Commons – as he is reputed to have hated it. Maybe he believes he is the Prime Minister Labour never had and wants to give them another chance. No – he’s not that stupid!

Hornsey Lane junction repairs to go ahead

Repairs to a traffic island in Crouch End are due to start following successful demands from local residents and ward councillors. Grass verges and kerbs had been damaged by large vehicles cutting the corner of the junction of Hornsey Lane and Hornsey Rise.

Haringey Council has now promised that the granite kerbs will be reinstated, re-using the dislodged stones, by the end of this week.

Local Liberal Democrats have also secured assurances from Haringey Council that a new traffic bollard will be installed to prevent future damage but will monitor the situation as the junction is likely to be put under the further weight of heavy traffic accessing local housing developments.

Cllr Lyn Weber (Crouch End) comments:

“Haringey Council should get on to problems like these as soon as they occur and seek to prevent them in the first place.

“I’m glad the immediate problem is being sorted but the issue about large lorries overrunning the island will still remain. The situation is only likely to intensify as large lorries accessing the Roden Court building site face the same difficult road geometry. I will be keeping a vigilant eye to make sure this solution works.”

Outrage as 82 year old with foot problems denied care on the NHS

A Muswell Hill resident has been forced to look for private health care after she was denied vital foot care on the NHS, local MP Lynne Featherstone recently found out as she visited her home.

Since 2007, when her local Fortis Green clinic closed, Mrs. Audrey Kelly, 82, who suffers from severe foot problems that often leave her unable to walk, has been refused treatment or referral to an NHS chiropodist by her GP. Mrs. Kelly, who is on income support, has been told that, as she is not considered a ‘high risk’ patient, the only way she can get foot care is to go private.

Local Liberal Democrats are now calling on Haringey PCT to provide a foot care service, similar to the one that was provided at the Fortis Green clinic, when Hornsey Hospital opens next year.

Local MP Lynne Featherstone, comments:

“It is outrageous and completely unreasonable that the NHS will not treat her foot problem. Mrs. Kelly is in such severe pain, and being unable to get treatment on the NHS, she tried self treatment, which left her worse off with severely bleeding and infected feet.

“Since the Fortis Green clinic closed, I have seen a real issue with elderly people being unable to get foot care on the NHS, despite NHS assurances that the service has not been cut. This is clearly not the case and Haringey PCT needs to deliver on its promises and ensure that people, like Mrs. Kelly, get the service they deserve.”

What will Boris Johnson be like as Mayor of London?

No prizes for guessing what my first newspaper column after the London elections is about…

This weekend eight years ago I was elected to the London Assembly – and Ken became London’s first Mayor. It was so exciting – a blank page on which to write the capital’s future. And now it’s Boris! Unbelievable…

What will Boris Johnson do to London? I have to ‘fess up immediately – I was upset by Boris even throwing his hat in the ring – let alone winning. To me he was not someone who had ever shown the slightest interest in London and its key issues prior to this opportunity knocking on his door.

Mind you – Ken had become arrogant from his years in office and really failed to tackle the issues of the sleaze and corruption allegations swirling around his advisers. Two of them had to quit in the end – but we are still left with a whole host of questions over what money went where and why, and Ken never looked like he was really interested in sorting out matters. The cheeky chappy of yesteryear had worn out our good will and we were clearly desperate for change. But will that change be for the better?

To continue reading the piece, visit my website.

What happened to the left-wing Gordon Brown?

Gordon BrownPerhaps one shouldn’t interfere with private grief – but I am intrigued by the post-mortems being conducted by numerous people in the Labour Party on the lines of – Gordon Brown, what went wrong? I think there are two main political strategy dilemmas facing the party.

First, keep Gordon or ditch Gordon? Can he really recover from plunging to such depths of unpopularity? Given the increasing volatility of political opinion in recent years, there should be a degree of caution over “worst ratings since the 1930s” type headlines – but there’s no doubt the situation is grim for Labour.

Second – whether with Gordon at the helm or not – should Labour move leftwards? And this is why coming across an old opinion poll recently caught my eye. Back in September 2004 (you know, in those far off days when Gordon Brown was popular, all football matches started at 3pm on a Saturday and there were only three TV channels), YouGov had a poll asking the public to rate various leading politicians on a left-right scale. Now, I’m not a huge fan of such scales – because they strip out other important dimensions, such as liberal vs authoritarian (increasingly important these days!) – but they do have a certain crude use.

And what did the YouGov poll find? Blair was viewed as slightly right of centre (+4), voters put themselves on average slightly left of centre (-2), Charles Kennedy and the Liberal Democrats a bit further left of centre (-15), Gordon Brown further left (-22) and Labour MPs overall at -25. Michael Howard and the Conservatives were way off to the right at +52

Issues like the 10p tax rate fiasco are hardly ones which have left Gordon Brown with a similar left-wing image now. So – does he try to regain that former reputation, which went along with much greater personal popularity back then, or does he doggedly try to stick to a middle ground which – under New Labour and Blair – has steadily drifted to the right? Not an easy choice to make!

Is Labour backing down over changing sexist rules?

So – at last – a question on the Order Paper in Parliament about the Single Equalities Act. I have, since becoming Equalities Spokesperson, been waiting to be able to raise the issue of how our rules about who gets to be monarch gives boys the advantage over girls.

As readers of this blog will know, have been having some success with raising and pushing this issue. The Sunday Times – who covered it on their front page a couple of weeks ago – helped up the ante as when Marie Woolf (journalist) rang Vera Baird (Solicitor General) – and the minister said of course these rules should be abolished – and threw in abolishing discrimination against Catholics too. You go girl.

It’s obviously working as lots of members from all sides of the House raised the issue (for which the technical term is the dry as dust phrase ‘male preference primogeniture’). But since the article the Government has been trying to back peddle on what Vera Baird said – and whilst the Tory front bench spokesperson seemed to be in favour of change – he tried to talk up problems – because any change has to be worked through the Commonwealth – suggesting that it was all so difficult that we might wish not to bother to pursue it.

This sidetracked me a bit. Faced with the usual Tory attitude that somehow it doesn’t matter enough to be dealt with – I momentarily forgot that it is the Government that has to really push this. Reminded of my task my Mr Speaker – I then did pursue Labour – to try and get them to commit to actually walking the walk rather than just their usual talking the talk.

I am worried that this will be kicked into the long grass of too difficult and too much bother and the opportunity presented by the Single Equality Act going through Parliament to kill off this anachronism will be missed.

But it was very heartening to see so many members from all sides in favour of this long overdue change. So we’ll see!

Catch me in the media

A busy burst of media coverage – did a pre-record with GMTV this morning for Sunday – talking about election results and also how to tackle crime amongst young people (6am on GMTV and then 7:25am on GMTV Digital). Doing LBC this evening at 6pm – so call in with your questions! On Sunday it’s The Westminster Hour on Radio 4 at 10pm – and then next Friday, Any Questions, also on Radio 4. Fun, fun, fun!

Also feature in The Times Parliamentary sketch today (in which Ann Treneman treated me with a light touch – for which I am grateful!) and allegations of sexual harassment at the British Embassy in Iraq.

Robert Gorrie elected as new Liberal Democrat leader

Haringey Liberal Democrats last night elected Hornsey councillor Robert Gorrie as their new leader. The popular councillor, with a strong record in both in public service and business has been congratulated by colleagues and local MP Lynne Featherstone.

Robert Gorrie was elected in Hornsey on a massive swing in 2006, taking the previously safe seat from Labour. He has been Liberal Democrat Finance Spokesperson, masterminding the Liberal Democrat alternative budget and has repeatedly challenged Labour-run Haringey Council’s waste and mismanagement.

Robert’s business experience makes him well equipped for the task of leading the Liberal Democrat group. Most recently he spent five years as one of the directors that built the Ocado online grocery delivery retailer from scratch to a business with a turnover equivalent to Haringey Council’s annual budget. He remains on the board and still advises the award winning company on staff consultation and communication.

Robert Gorrie has Liberal Democrat politics in his blood. His father, Donald Gorrie has been a Lib Dem MP, MSP and was a local councillor for 35 years. Robert follows this tradition as a campaigning councillor. He has fought locally for residents to be involved in the development of the Hornsey Depot site, challenged the lack of community facilities in the Campsbourne Estate and pushed for long-term solutions to issues of anti-social behaviour and economic disadvantage faced by many residents.

Outgoing Lib Dem leader Neil Williams comments:

“I’m absolutely delighted that in Robert Gorrie we have not just a new leader for the Liberal Democrats, but a brilliant Council Leader in-waiting. He couldn’t be better equipped for the job, and it is the people of Haringey that will benefit the most from his skills.”

Councillor Robert Gorrie, Haringey Liberal Democrats’ new leader adds:

“I am thrilled to have the opportunity to lead such a capable team who are poised to take control of Haringey Council. I look forward to continuing the fight for local residents, for an end to Haringey Labour’s waste and for victory in 2010.”

Local Liberal Democrat MP Lynne Featherstone adds:

“I am delighted to welcome such a talented campaigner to the top job in our council group.I have no doubt that he will hold no punches in exposing Haringey Labour’s waste and mismanagement. Together we will be a formidable duo fighting for the people of Haringey.”

Boris wins

I went into City Hall last Sunday to do the BBC’s Politics Show on the London election results. Ken Livingstone was already virtually gone. Desks were being cleared and the new regime was undoubtedly choosing the wallpaper and furniture. The King is dead. Long live the King!

This weekend eight years ago I was elected to the London Assembly – and Ken became London’s first Mayor. It was so exciting – a blank page on which to write the capital’s future. And now it’s Boris! Unbelievable…

What will Boris Johnson do to London? I have to ‘fess up immediately – I was upset by Boris even throwing his hat in the ring – let alone winning. To me he was not someone who had ever shown the slightest interest in London and its key issues prior to this opportunity knocking on his door.

Mind you – Ken had become arrogant from his years in office and really failed to tackle the issues of the sleaze and corruption allegations swirling around his advisers. Two of them had to quit in the end – but we are still left with a whole host of questions over what money went where and why, and Ken never looked like he was really interested in sorting out matters. The cheeky chappy of yesteryear had worn out our good will and we were clearly desperate for change. But will that change be for the better?

Liberal Democrat candidate Brian Paddick was mercilessly squeezed by celebrity – and the fight by the Labour and Tory armies to get their vote out showed in London’s results. I want to pay tribute to Brian for being such a good candidate. As he put it himself – he didn’t do bad for a ‘talented amateur’. But up against two big beasts and to be frank, old political stagers like Ken and Boris, he was caught in the cross fire as the big beasts slugged it out.

So now we watch to see what Boris does with his new job. It has to be one of the best jobs there is – to be Mayor of this great city. My fears are that he will take London backwards. To be a success as Mayor you have to get the details right – and when pressed on issue after issue Boris either floundered (as on the costings of his bus policies) or frequently back-tracked from previous statements. As Mayor he’ll have a huge staff to help deliver the details, so perhaps he will pull it off, perhaps not. Time will tell!

The voting would seem to say that outer London has wreaked its revenge on a Zone 1 Mayor. But the last thing we need is a Mayor who now spends four years shoring up his outer London vote ready for the next contest. That was Ken’s Achilles heel. He spent much of his time and money devoted to the groups that would repay him electorally.

The first four years of Ken’s reign, I stood shoulder to shoulder with him to introduce the first congestion charge – when it was still about reducing congestion, not raising revenue. I stood shoulder to shoulder with him against the Government’s expensive and ill-thought out private finance for the tube. But then he rejoined the Labour Party – and it was all down hill after that. And in the end the seeming use of the London Development Agency to fund his adviser’s friends’ projects (now being investigated) said it all. It was nicknamed ‘Ken’s Bank’.

That’s the main thing I had against Ken – that in the end it became more about funding his re-election and less about governing for all Londoners.

So my advice to Boris is don’t follow the same route. Don’t simply do the converse of Ken and engineer all your efforts towards those who support you. It is patently wrong for any Mayor to simply channel funds to their own political strongholds. London needs a Mayor who will fight for all Londoners. Ken became a divisive figure – and that is my real beef with him. He set outer London against inner, rich against poor and race against race. He did lots many good things in London and when history is written it will remember those kindly. But his cynical use of his office and divide and rule will also be part of his political epitaph.

Boris – you have the chance of a lifetime. Delivery is all!

(c) Lynne Featherstone, 2008