What will Lord Laming have found?

The Laming findings on how his recommendations following the Victoria Climbie tragedy have been implemented will be reported tomorrow.

I have had some qualms about Lord Laming looking at his own recommendations as I have been afraid he might not want to find fault. However, he takes the issue of child protection extremely seriously and is the wise old owl who realised that the leadership was key to changing the way a department works – hence the Children’s Act 2004 which made clear where individual responsibility should rest – and so ultimately was why Sharon Shoesmith and Liz Santry were in the frame.

From all the leaks, I expect that Laming will have looked pretty thoroughly at social workers’ caseloads and discovered that they are not kept to the 12 cases I believe he recommended. But I also hope that he has looked at the line management. We were all gobsmacked that Baby P could be visited so many times to no avail. Surely we must see the creation of a culture where if the social worker visiting is too scared or inexperienced etc to ask to see the child from top to bottom – it would be normal for her or him to go back and report this, be supported, and be accompanied back to satisfy themselves of the true condition of the child.

More tick boxes and process driven stuff is the last thing we need – so I’m glad that Laming looks to be staying clear of that. However, I am pretty sure that the atmosphere on the Safeguarding Children Board in Haringey was such that the members gave up putting forward their professional views – as my understanding is that they were simply over-ruled by management and bludgeoned ultimately into silent acquiescence. This needs to change – and so a key recommendation I will look for will be to have the Board discussions and particularly disagreements minuted. They are not currently.

Outside of the leadership and management within Children’s Services – I am fearful that the wider issues will not feature – and those wider issues if not examined now will cause us regret after some future tragedy.

So what about the joining together of education and children’s social services – has it worked? I tread carefully as they were joined to stop children falling through the gap – but clearly in Haringey the Director of Education found herself then in charge of an area where she had no experience. How significant was that? During the furore – Ms Shoesmith was supported by many Heads of Schools who praised her education record – but amongst the hundreds of people from social services who contacted me, not one praised her work on that side.

What about the issue of Haringey Labour Council not heeding any of the warnings that children were at risk? They had plenty – from me, from relatives, from whistleblowers and from opposition members. They ignored all of them. If something is wrong – how can the administration be made to listen? Secrecy, cover-ups and rank closing were the culture of Haringey Labour and officers. Gagging orders, injunctions, refusal to submit to scrutiny and so on meant that no light shone on what was going on. Moreover, even since the furore and the shaming of Haringey – Labour are still blocking moves to proper oversight.

Then there’s the inspection regime. Ofsted gave Haringey three stars just whilst all this was going on under the cover. How can we rely on an inspection system that failed so miserably? And what of the Government whose system of stars makes authorities jump through hoops to get funding and autonomy – putting the temptation in front of people to fiddle and distort the system?

And what of budgetary pressures – they are ever-present. It was said that in an email managers were told not to take children into care because there was no funding. What part did this play?

And finally – what of the nightmare going on in the health services? More of that later.

So you can see – whilst I am hopeful Lord Laming’s recommendations will address some of the issues – in my view we still need a public inquiry on these other issues to ensure that the whole debacle and failure that let Baby P be killed is properly and extensively addressed.

0 thoughts on “What will Lord Laming have found?

  1. I don’t think Haringey is unique with regards to a lot of these concerns. I think the formation of Childrens’ Services has pushed the social services into the shade as while education is a clear vote-winner – social work is the preserve of ‘other people’. Noone is particularly interested in the issues or funding for social workers until things go very wrong as they did and probably still do in Haringey. But it is a national problem which has been exacerbated by nationally imposed policies. The targets, the being-chained-behind-desks are all endemic in social services departments nationally as we (yes, I’m a social worker!) are being pushed to meet the targets by councils that are chasing meaningless stars at the expense of being given the time to provide the quality levels of support which we want to. I think the results of the report are somewhat predictable. I hope the central government has the guts to actually try to understand social work a bit better although I can’t honestly believe it as long as they look to The Sun for political guidance. What I want? Is for politicians to take social work seriously rather than using us as political footballs to do the work noone else wants to do and insult us in the process.

  2. No matter what the failings of government approach, the structural limitations, policy constraints, too many people given pencils with erasers at each end, social workers could still have saved the life of Baby P with the minimum of effort.

  3. Social Workers and Medical Professionals and Health Visitors and Police and Hospital staff – but the focus is on the social workers solely. Without doubt choices have to be made and where should the buck lie? With Haringey who are forced to employ any social worker who responds to the job adverts – or those who might be working in a less than healthy culture. Of course the culture of a working environment affects the front line workers. If managers are slack and defensive, it is not an environment in which positive social work can be explored and created. That is what we need to work towards but the ‘we’ is becoming narrower as it becomes so fashionable to bash social workers at every possible opportunity. I don’t work in Haringey. I don’t know the specific details and am perhaps, extrapolating out from one tragic situation where clearly mistakes were made. I will not justify mistakes – rightly, the social workers involved are being investigated by the GSCC just as the doctors have been by the GMC. It is the trial by media though that seems to be exclusively reserved for the social work profession as a whole that I find more difficult to understand. I don’t expect anyone to care because ultimately until these tragic cases come to light, no-one much cares for the recipients of social work input.

  4. Social workers perform an invaluable service. They are much maligned but in the Baby P case the damage was largely self-inflicted. Sharon Shoesmith’s arrogance guaranteed severe censure. And the request to give Mommy Dreadful access to the child born in jail beggared belief.